Skip to main content
Log in

Applying the Glenoid Track Concept in the Management of Patients with Anterior Shoulder Instability

  • Management of Anterior Shoulder Instability (X Li, section editor)
  • Published:
Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the recent evolution in the treatment of anterior shoulder instability and the dynamic interaction between the glenoid and Hill-Sachs lesion.

Recent Findings

Through the glenoid track concept, glenoid- and humeral-sided bone loss are evolving away from being approached as separate entities. Recent cadaveric studies have validated the glenoid track concept. Moreover, a recent clinical study has demonstrated a much higher rate of failure after arthroscopic Bankart repair for shoulders that were off track.

Summary

The glenoid track concept is a useful tool in evaluating patients with anterior shoulder instability. Shoulders that are off track may require more than a simple arthroscopic Bankart, and the addition of a remplissage or bony transfer may be considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Itoi E, Lee SB, Berglund LJ, Berge LL, An KN. The effect of a glenoid defect on anteroinferior stability of the shoulder after bankart repair: a cadaveric study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82:35–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. •• Di Giacomo G, Itoi E, Burkhart SS. Evolving concept of biopolar bone loss and the Hill-Sachs lesion: from “engaging/non-engaging” lesion to “on-track/off-track” lesion. Arthroscopy. 2014;30:90–8. Excellent review and explanation of the glenoid track concept. Illustrations help the reader understand how to calculate and visualize whether the shoulder is on track or off track.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Burkhart SS, De Beer JF. Traumatic glenohumeral bone defects and their relationship to failure of arthroscopic Bankart repairs: significance of inverted-pear glenoid and the humeral engaging Hill-Sachs lesion. Arthroscopy. 2000;16:677–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hill HA, Sachs MD. The grooved defect of the humeral head: a frequently unrecognized complication of the shoulder joint. Radiology. 1940;35:690–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sekiya JK, Wickwire AC, Stehle JH, Debski RE. Hill-Sachs defects and repair using osteoarticular allograft transplantation: biomechanical analysis using a joint compression model. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37:2459–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yamamoto N, Itoi E, Abe H, Minagawa H, Seki N, Shimada Y, et al. Contact between the glenoid and the humeral head in abduction, external rotation, and horizontal extension: a new concept of glenoid track. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2007;16:649–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. • Arciero RA, Parrino A, Bernhardson AS, Diaz-Doran V, Obopilwe E, Cote MP, et al. The effect of a combined glenoid and Hill-Sachs defect on glenohumeral stability: a biomechanical cadaveric study using 3-dimension modeling of 142 patients. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43:1422–9. Recent cadaveric study demonstrating how various sizes of glenoid-and humeral-sided bone loss interact and lead to recurrent instability.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hartzler RU, Bui CN, Jeong WK, Akeda M, Peterson A, McGarry M, et al. Remplissage of an off-track Hill-Sachs lesion is necessary to restore biomechanical glenohumeral joint stability in a bipolar bone loss model. Arthroscopy. 2016;32:2466–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Omori Y, Yamamoto N, Koishi H, Futai K, Goto A, Sugamoto K, et al. Measurement of the glenoid track in vivo as investigated by 3-dimensional motion analysis using open MRI. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42:1290–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gyftopoulos S, Beltran LS, Bookman J, Rokito A. MRI evaluation of bipolar bone loss using the on-track off-track method: a feasibility study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015;205:848–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Burns DM, Chahal J, Shahrokhi S, Henry P, Wasserstein D, Whyne C, et al. Diagnosis of engaging biopolar bone defects in the shoulder using 2-dimensional computed tomography: a cadaveric study. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44:2771–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Schneider AK, Hoy GA, Ek ET, Rotstein AH, Tate J, Taylor DM, et al. Interobserver and intraobserver variability of glenoid track measurements. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2017;26:573–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Metzger PD, Barlow B, Leonardelli D, Peace W, Solomon DJ, Provencher MT. Clinical application of the “glenoid track” concept for defining humeral head engagement in anterior shoulder instability: a preliminary report. Orthop J Sports Med. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967113496213.

  14. •• Shaha JS, Cook JB, Rowles DJ, Bottoni CR, Shaha SH, Tokish JM. Clinical validation of the glenoid track concept in anterior glenohumeral instability. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016;98:1918–23. This is the first paper to clinically validate the glenoid track concept. Those patients who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair and were off track had a significantly higher chance for recurrent instability when compared to those patients that were on track.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Locher J, Wilken F, Beitzel K, Buchmann S, Longo UG, Denaro V, et al. Hill-Sachs off-track lesions as risk factor for recurrence of instability after arthroscopic Bankart repair. Arthroscopy. 2016;32:1993–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mook WR, Petri M, Greenspoon JA, Horan MP, Dornan GJ, Millett PJ. Clinical and anatomic predictors of outcomes after the latarjet procedure for the treatment of anterior glenohumeral instability with combined glenoid and humeral bone defects. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44:1407–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Katthagen JC, Anavian J, Tahal DS, Millett PJ. Arthroscopic remplissage and open latarjet procedure for the treatment of anterior glenohumeral instability with severe bipolar bone loss. Arthrosc Tech. 2016;5:e1135–41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Montgomery SR, Katthagen JC, Mikula JD, Marchetti DC, Tahal DS, Dornan GJ, et al. Anatomic and biomechanical comparison of the classic and congruent arc techniques of the Latarjet procedure. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45:1252–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dumont GD, Vopat BG, Parada S, Cohn R, Makani A, Sanchez G, et al. Traditional versus congruent arc Latarjet technique: effect on surface area for union and bone width surrounding screws. Arthroscopy. 2017;33:946–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John M. Tokish.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Both authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Management of Anterior Shoulder Instability

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Momaya, A.M., Tokish, J.M. Applying the Glenoid Track Concept in the Management of Patients with Anterior Shoulder Instability. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 10, 463–468 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-017-9436-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-017-9436-1

Keywords

Navigation