Abstract
This article aims to illuminate the role of narrativity in Grounded Theory Methodology and to explore an approach within Grounded Theory Methodology that is sensitized towards aspects of narrativity. The suggested approach takes into account narrativity as an aspect of the underlying data. It reflects how narrativity could be conceptually integrated and systematically used for shaping the way in which coding, category development and the presentation of results in a Grounded Theory Methodology study proceed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
If one follows authors such as Schütze (1987), narratives can be differentiated from other forms of text, such as description or argumentation, since they represent meaningful structures of varying length, whose component parts (e.g., the beginning and the end of a story) are more or less loosely connected with one another implying at least some kind of temporal order.
References
Berg, C., & Milmeister, M. (2008). From dialoguing with data to finding one’s own way of telling the story. On grounded theory methodology coding procedures. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research 9(2), Art. 13, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0802138.
Böhm, A. (2004). Theoretical coding: Text analysis in grounded theory. In U. Flick, E. von Kardorff, & I. Steinke (Eds.), A companion to qualitative research (pp. 270–275). London: Sage.
Brockmeier, J. (2009). Reaching for meaning: Human agency and the narrative imagination. Theory & Psychology, 19(2), 213–233.
Brockmeier, J., & Carbaugh, D. (2001). Narrative and identity: Studies in autobiography, self and culture. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Bruner, J. S. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge: University of Harvard Press.
Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (Eds.). (2010). The sage handbook of grounded theory. London: Sage.
Burke, K. (1969 [Orig. 1945]). A grammar of motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
Clarke, A. E. (2005). Situational analysis—Grounded theory after the postmodern turn. London: Sage.
Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. L. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Denzin, N. K. (2003). The call to performance. Symbolic Interaction, 26(1), 187–207.
Deppermann, A. (2013). Editorial: Positioning in narrative interaction. Narrative Inquiry, 23(1), 1–15.
Diaz-Bone, R. (2012). Review essay: Situationsanalyse—Strauss meets Foucault?. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 14(1), Art. 11, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1301115.
Evers, J., Mruck, K., Silver, C., & Peeters, B. in cooperation with S. di Gregorio & C. Tagg (Eds.). (2011). The KWALON experiment: Discussions on qualitative data analysis software by developers and users. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 3(2), http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/issue/view/36.
Gergen, K. J., & Gergen, M. M. (1988). Narrative and the self as relationship. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 21, pp. 17–56). San Diego: Academic.
Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis: Emergence vs. forcing. Mill Valley: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
Kelle, U. (2005). “Emergence” vs. “Forcing” of empirical data? A crucial problem of “Grounded Theory” reconsidered. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research 6(2), Art. 27, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0502275.
Labov, W., & Waletzky, J. (1967). Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. In J. Helm (Ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts (pp. 12–44). Seattle: University of Washington Press.
Lal, S., Suto, M., & Ungar, M. (2012). Examining the potential of combining the methods of grounded theory and narrative inquiry: A comparative analysis. The Qualitative Report, 17(21), 1–22. http://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol17/iss21/1.
Lucius-Hoene, G., & Deppermann, A. (2000). Narrative identity empiricized: A dialogical and positioning approach to autobiographical research interviews. Narrative Inquiry, 10(1), 199–222.
Lucius-Hoene, G., & Deppermann, A. (2004). Narrative identität und positionierung. Gesprächsforschung, 5, 166–183. http://www.gespraechsforschung-ozs.de/fileadmin/dateien/heft2004/ga-lucius.pdf.
Mishler, E. G. (1995). Models of narrative analysis: A typology. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 5(2), 87–123.
Mruck, K., & Mey, G. (2010). Grounded theory and reflexivity. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The sage handbook of grounded theory (pp. 487–510). London: Sage.
Polkinghorne, D. E. (1988). Narrative knowing and the human sciences. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Riemann, G. (Ed.). (2003). Doing biographical research. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research 4(3), http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/issue/view/17.
Riemann, G., & Schütze, F. (1991). “Trajectory” as a basic theoretical concept for analyzing suffering and disorderly social processes. In D. R. Maines (Ed.), Social organization and social process: Essays in honor of Anselm Straus (pp. 333–357). New York: de Gruyter, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-7214.
Riessman, C. K. (2009). Considering grounded theory: Categories, cases, and control. Symbolic Interaction, 32(4), 390–393.
Sarbin, T. R. (Ed.). (1986). Narrative psychology. The storied nature of human conduct. Westport: Praeger.
Schütze, F. (1987). Das narrative Interview in Interaktionsfeldstudien. Studienbrief der Universität Hagen, Teil 1. Hagen.
Straub, J. (2010). Erzähltheorie/Narration. In G. Mey, & K. Mruck (Eds.), Handbuch Qualitative Forschung in der Psychologie (pp. 136–150). Wiesbaden: VS.
Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park: Sage.
Strauss, A. L., & Glaser, B. G. (1970). Anguish—The case history of a dying trajectory. Mill Valley: Sociology Press.
Acknowledgments
We wish to thank the anonymous reviewers for their critical thoughts and valuable advice and are grateful for Carolin Demuth’s tremendous commitment as editor of this special issue.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ruppel, P.S., Mey, G. Grounded Theory Methodology—Narrativity Revisited. Integr. psych. behav. 49, 174–186 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-015-9301-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-015-9301-y