Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

How do Iranian women from Rafsanjan conceptualize their sexual behaviors?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Sexuality & Culture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In Iran, women’s sexual behaviors have not been studied in detail. The aim of this study was to explore the sexual meanings generated through the lived experience of women residing in Rafsanjan, a city in the Kerman province, where interviews and focus group discussions were conducted with 51 Iranian women. Content analysis was adopted to extract the meanings and perceptions. We categorized the findings into three aspects: sexual capacity, motivation, and performance. Sexual desire was the most important concept that women used when they were referring to their sexual capacity. Marriage was the main institution in which women’s motivation for sexual relationships and encounters resided, and “the priority of men’s sexual needs and characteristics” was identified as the core principle of marriage. The concept of sexual performance was more salient and tied to the husband’s sexual initiation. Analyzing the women’s narratives revealed that women’s sexual self-understandings and their sexual behaviors are strongly determined by “androcentricity”, this being relevant both to sexuality education and reproductive health. Recognition of this issue will facilitate understanding of the cultural foundations of sexuality among Iranians and help health providers in suggesting culturally appropriate and compatible forms of health care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amini, E. (2011). The Conflict Over Social Construction of Iranian Women’s Sexuality in Three Generations.: Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association Annual Meeting, Caesar’s Palace, Las Vegas. August 19, 2011.

  • Anarfi, J. K., & Owusu, A. Y. (2011). The making of a sexual being in Ghana: The state, religion and the influence of society as agents of sexual socialization. Sexuality& Culture, 15, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F. (2000). Gender differences in erotic plasticity: The female sex drive as socially flexible and responsive. Psychological Bulletin, 126(3), 347–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckmann, N. (2010). Pleasure and danger: Muslim views on sex and gender in Zinzibar. Culture Health & Sexuality, 12(6), 619–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brian, L. N. (2009). Do men ever say no to sex? Questioning stereotypes about sexual gatekeeping. Master of Arts thesis, University of Kansas.

  • Byers, E. S. (1995). How well does the traditional sexual script explain sexual coercion? Review of a program of research. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 8, 7–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goshtasebi, A., Vahdaninia, M., & Rahimi Foroshani, A. (2009). Prevalence and potential risk factors of female sexual difficulties: An urban Iranian population-based study. J Sex Med., 6(11), 2988–2996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graneheim, U. H., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. [Review]. Nurse Education Today, 24(2), 105–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haeberle, E. J. (2007). Archive for sexology. www2.hu-berlin.de/sexology.

  • Hanassab, S. (1998). Sexuality, dating, and double standards: Young Iranian immigrants in Los Angeles. Iranian Studies, 31(1), 26–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanassab, S., & Tidwell, R. (1996). Sex role and sexual attitudes of young Iranian women: Implications for cross-cultural counselling. Social Behaviour and Personality, 24(2), 185–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hashemi, S., Seddigh, S., Ramezani Tehrani, F., Hasanzadeh Khansari, S. M., & Khodakarami, N. (2013). Sexual behavior of married Iranian women, attending Taleghani Public Health Center. Journal of Reproduction and Infertility, 14(1), 34–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, K., & Musialowski, D. (1986). Repeated exposure to sexually explicit stimuli: Novelty, sex, and sexual attitudes. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 15, 487–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lodge, A. C., & Anderson, D. (2012). All shook up: Sexuality of mid-to later life married couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74, 428–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maines, R. P. (1999). The technology of orgasm: “Hysteria,” the vibrator, and women’s sexual satisfaction. USA: Johns Hopkins studies in the history of technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, K. A., & Luke, K. P. (2010). Gender differences in the ABC’s of the birds and the bees: What mothers teach young children about sexuality and reproduction. Sex Roles, 62(3–4), 151–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDougall, J., Edmeades, J., & Krishnan, S. (2011). (Not) talking about sex: Couple reports of sexual discussion and expression in Bangalore, India. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 13(2), 141–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merghati-Khoei, E. (2005). Language of love in culture of silence: Sexual understanding of Iranian women and Socio-cultural determinants. PhD Qualitative, New South Wales, Sydney.

  • Merghati-Khoei, E., & Richters, J. (2008). Concepts of sexuality and health among Iranian women in Australia. Australian Family Physician, 37(3), 190–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mernissi, F. (1987). Beyond the veil: Male–female dynamics in modern Muslim society. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minton, H. L. (2000). Psychology and gender at the turn of the century. American Psychologist, 55(6), 613–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morse, J. M. (1995). Qualitative research methods for health professionals (2nd ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potts, A. (2005). Female sexual dysfunction’ in the 21st century: Different ‘problems’, new drugs, more pressures workshop in university of Vitoria. Faculty of Human and Social Development: School of Culture, Literature and Society, University of Canterbury.

  • Shadpour, K. (1994). The PHC experience in Iran. Tehran, UNICEF: The Council for Expansion of PHC Networks, Ministry of Health and Medical Education.

  • Shirpak, K. R., Chinichian, M., Matica-Tyndale, E., Ardebili, H. E., Pourreza, A., & Ramezankhani, A. (2008). A qualitative assessment of the sex education needs of married Iranian women. Sexuality& Culture, 12, 1333–1350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirvani, M. A., Nesami, M. B., & Bavand, M. (2010). Maternal sexuality after child birth among Iranian women. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 15(13), 385–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simms, D. C., & Byers, E. S. (2009). Interpersonal perceptions of desired frequency of sexual behaviours. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 18, 15–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soet, J. E., Dudley, W. N., & Dilorio, C. (1999). The effects of ethnicity and perceived power on women’s sexual behavior. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23(4), 707–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statistical centre of Iran. (2012). http://www.amar.org.ir.

  • Symons, D. (1980). Precis of the evolution of human sexuality. 3Behavioral and Brain Sciences, , 171–213.

  • Tiefer, L. (1995). Sex is not a natural act and other essays. Boulder: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiefer, L. (2001). Arriving at a ‘new view’ of women’s sexual problems: Background, theory, and activism. In E. Kaschak (Ed.), A new view of women’s sexual problems (pp. 63–98). New York: Haworth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webber, M., & Bezanson, K. (1991). Rethinking society in the 21st century: Critical readings in sociology (2nd ed). GSPI.

  • Yam, Y. B. (2011). Concepts: Reductionism. Retrieved from New England complex systems institute, solving problems of science and society website. http://necsi.edu/guide/concepts/reductionism.html.

Download references

Acknowledgments

Thanks to the Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, for funding the research. Our special thanks to the women who supported our inquiry by their active participation in discussions. Thanks to Ms Hanieh Hashemian for the translation of the manuscript to English.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zohreh Ghorashi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Merghati-Khoei, E., Ghorashi, Z., Yousefi, A. et al. How do Iranian women from Rafsanjan conceptualize their sexual behaviors?. Sexuality & Culture 18, 592–607 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-013-9212-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-013-9212-3

Keywords

Navigation