Skip to main content
Log in

Prognostic and predictive value of plasma D-dimer in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients undergoing first-line chemotherapy

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Clinical and Translational Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Previous studies have demonstrated that plasma D-dimer, a degradation product of cross-linked fibrin, correlated with tumor stage and prognosis in cancer patients. The aim of this study is to examine whether plasma D-dimer levels before and during chemotherapy predict tumor response and survival in advanced NSCLC patients undergoing first line chemotherapy.

Methods

Plasma D-dimer levels before (B0), and after one (B1) and two (B2) cycles of chemotherapy in 82 patients with advanced NSCLC were measured and correlated with treatment response, clinical features, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival.

Results

A significant correlation was identified between changes in D-dimer levels before and after two chemotherapy cycles and treatment response. In addition, there were significant correlations between D-dimer positivity at B0, B1 and B2 time points and tumor stage, number of metastatic sites and treatment response. Patients with positivity of D-dimer at B0, B1 and B2 had significantly shorter PFS compared with those with negativity. Notably, positivity of D-dimer at B1 and B2 time points was an independent predictive factor for unfavorable PFS.

Conclusions

The positivity of D-dimer before and during chemotherapy is a predictor of treatment response and worse PFS in patients with advanced NSCLC. D-dimer levels provide prognostic information in addition to that of imaging studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E. Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010;60:277–300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jett JR, Schild SE, Keith RL, Kesler KA. Treatment of non-small cell lung cancer, stage IIIB ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edn). Chest. 2007;132(suppl):266s–76s.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Socinski MA, Crowell R, Hensing TE, Langer CJ, Lilenbaum R, Sandler AB, et al. Treatment of non-small cell lung cancer, stage IV ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edn). Chest. 2007;132(suppl):277s–89s.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, Wanders J, Kapalan RS, Rubinstein L, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and treatment of cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United states, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:205–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ardizzoni A, Cafferata MA, Tiseo M, Filiberti R, Marroni P, Grossi F, et al. Decline in serum carcinoembryonic antigen and cytokeratin 19 fragment during chemotherapy predicts objective response and survival in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer. Cancer. 2006;107:2842–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ishiguro F, Fukui T, Mori S, Katayama T, Sakakura N, Hatooka S, et al. Serum carcinoembryonic antigen levels as a surrogate marker for the evaluation of lung response to chemotherapy in nonsmall cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;16:242–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Indovina P, Marcelli E, Maranta P, Tarro G. Lung Cancer proteomics: recent advances in biomarker discovery. Int J Proteomics 2011;2011:1–7. doi:10.1155/2011/726869.

  8. Lyman GH, Khorana AA. Cancer, clots and consensus: new understanding of an old problem. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4821–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Caine GJ, Stonelake PS, Lip GY, Kehoe ST. The hypercoagulabe state of malignancy: pathogenesis and current debate. Neoplasia. 2002;4:465–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Falanga A, Panove-Noeva M, Russo L. Procoagulant mechanism in tumor-cells. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 2009;22:49–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kvolik S, Jukic M, Matijevic M, Marjanovic K, Glavas-Obrovac L. An Overview of coagulation disorders in cancer patients. Surg Oncol. 2010;19:33–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lippi G, Franchini M, Targher G, Favaloro EJ. Help me, doctor! My D-dimer is raised. Ann Med. 2008;40:594–605.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Batschauer APB, Figueiredo CP, Bueno EC, Ribeiro MA, Dusse LMS, Fernandes AP, et al. D-Dimer as a possible prognostic marker of operable hormone receptor-negative breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2010;21:1267–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Blackwell K, Haroon Z, Broadwater G, Berry O, Harris L, Iglehart JD, et al. Plasma D-dimer levels in operable breast cancer patients correlate with clinical stage and axillary lymph node status. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:600–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dirix LY, Salgado R, Weytjens R, Colpaert C, Benoy I, Huget P, et al. Plasma fibrin D-dimer levels correlate with tumour volume, progression rate and survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2002;86:389–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kwon H-C, Oh SY, Lee S, Kim S-H, Han JY, Koh RY, et al. Plasma levels of prothrombin fragment F1 + 2, D-dimer and prothrombin time correlate with clinical stage and lymph node metastasis in operable gastric cancer patients. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2008;38:2–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Oya M, Akiyama Y, Okuyama T, Ishikawa H. High preoperative plasma D-dimer levels is associated with advanced tumor stage and shorter survival after curative resection in patients with colorectal cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2001;31:388–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Blackwell K, Hurcvitz H, Lieberm G, Novotny W, Snyder S, Dewhirst M, et al. Circulating D-dimer levels are better predictors of overall survival and disease progression than carcinoembryonic antigen levels in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Cancer. 2004;101:77–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gadducci A, Baicchi U, Marrai R, Facchini V, del Bravo B, Fosella PV, et al. Pretreatment plasma levels of fibrinopeptide-A (FPA), D-dimer (DD), and von Willebrand factor (vWF) in patients with operable cervical cancer: influence of surgical-pathological stage, tumor size, histologic type, and lymph node status. Gynecol Oncol. 1993;49:354–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Khoury JD, Adcock DM, Chan F, Symanowski JT, Tiefenbacher S, Goodman O, et al. Increases in quantitative D-dimer levels correlate with progressive disease better than circulating tumor cell counts in patients with refractory prostate cancer. Am J Clin Pathol. 2010;134:964–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hong SK, Ko DW, Park J, Kim IS, Doo SH, Yoon CY, et al. Alteration of antithrombin III and D-dimer levels in clinically localized prostate cancer. Korean J Urol. 2010;51:25–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tomimaru Y, Yano M, Takachi K, Kishi K, Miyashiro I, Ohue M, et al. Plasma D-dimer levels show correlation with number of lymph node metastases in patients with esophageal cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;202:139–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Diao D, Zhu K, Wang Z, Cheng Y, Li K, Pei L, et al. Prognostic value of the D-dimer test in oesophageal cancer during the perioperative period. J Surg Oncol. 2013;108:34–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Antoniou D, Pavlakou G, Stathopoulos GP, Karydis I, Chondrou E, Papageorgiou C, et al. Predictive value of D-dimer plasma levels in response and progressive disease in patients with lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2006;53:205–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Altiay G, Ciftci A, Demir M, Kocak Z, Sut N, Tabakoglue, et al. High Plasma D-dimer level is associated with decreased survival in patients with lung cancer. Clin Oncol. 2007;19:494–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang PP, Sun JW, Wang XY, Liu XM, Li K. Preoperative plasma D-dimer levels predict survival in patients with operable non-small cell lung cancer independently of venous thromboembolism. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013;39:951–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Baccheri G, Torchio P, Ferrigno D. Plasma levels of D-dimer in lung carcinoma clinical and prognostic significance. Cancer. 2003;97:3044–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ferrigno D, Buccheri G, Ricca I. Prognostic significance of blood coagulation test in lung cancer. Eur Respir J. 2001;17:667–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no potential conflicts of interests.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ge, LP., Li, J., Bao, QL. et al. Prognostic and predictive value of plasma D-dimer in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients undergoing first-line chemotherapy. Clin Transl Oncol 17, 57–64 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-014-1198-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-014-1198-2

Keywords

Navigation