Skip to main content
Log in

Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy with Flap Suturing

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Multiple reports have demonstrated the efficacy of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR). However the results of the same have varied from centre to centre. Many still regard external DCR as the gold standard. To describe an endoscopic DCR technique which anatomically simulates an external DCR and assess its results. Prospective, nonrandomized and noncomparative interventional case series. Clinical charts of patients with nasolacrimal duct obstruction based on symptomatic, clinical and radiological basis were included in the study. All surgeries were done endonasally using standard operative technique. The modification in the standard technique included creating a wide exposure of the lacrimal sac, incising the sac and the suturing the medial wall of the lacrimal sac with the lateral nasal wall. The same was achieved by using either vascular clips or 5.0 vicryl sutures. Twenty (11 females and 9 males) were included in the study. The average age of the patients was 56.86 years old (range 27–85 years old). The main presenting symptom was epiphora and 1 patient with mucocele. Successful outcome was measured in terms of relief of sympto anatomical patency assessed by sac syringing and nasal endoscopy showing a wide patent lumen. A primary success rate of 95% and ultimate rate of 100% was achieved in the cases with a nasolacrimal duct (NLD) block while an overall success rate of 82.6% was noted when the cases with NLD block and common canalicular block were considered together. Endoscopic DCR can now easily replace external DCR as a standard. It is not only minimally invasive, but has minimal complications and using this technique, we have been able to achieve very high success rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tsirbas A, Wormald PJ (2003) Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy with mucosal flap. Am J Opthalmol 135:76–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Caldwell GW (1893) Two new operations for obstruction of the nasal duct, with preservation of the canaliculi, and with an incidental description of a new lacrimal probe. Am J Opthalmol 10:189–193

    Google Scholar 

  3. McDonough M, Meiring JH (1989) Endoscopic transnasal dacryocystorhinostomy. J Laryngol Otol 103:585–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Onceri M, Orhan M, Ogretmenoglu O, Irkec M (2000) Long term results and reasons for failure of intranasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Acta Otolaryngol 120:319–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yuen KSC, Lam LYM, Tse MWY, Chan DDN, Won BWC, Chan WM (2004) Modified endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with posterior lacrimal sac flap for nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Hong Kong Med J 10:394–400

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Yung MW, Hardman-Lea S (2002) Analysis of the results of surgical endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: effect of the level of obstruction. Br J Opthalmol 86:792–794

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Leong SC, Karkos PD, Burgess P, Halliwell M, Hampal SA (2010) Comparison of outcomes between nonlaser endoscopic endonasal and external dacryocystorhiostomy: single centre experience and a review of British trends. Am J Otolaryngol 31:32–37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ozgur Y, Mehmet S, Umit T, Serdar C, Kadir E, Murat Y (2007) External and endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy in chronic dacryocystitis: comparison of results. Eur Arch Oto rhino laryngol 264:879–885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jha KN, Ramalingam WVBS (2009) External versus endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: a retrospective study. MJAFI 65:23–25

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jim HR, Yeon JY, Cho MJ (2006) Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: creation of large marsulialized lacrimal sac. J Korean Med Sci 21:719–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Liao SL, Kao SC, Tseng JH, Chen Hou PK (2000) Results of intraoperative mitomycin c application in dacryocystorhinostomy. Br J Opthalmol 84:903–906

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Selig YK, Biesman BS, Rebeiz EE (2000) Topical application of mitomycin c in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Am J Rhinol 14:205–207

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Zilelioglu G, Ugurbas SH, Anadolu Y, Akmer M, Akturk T (1998) Adjunctive use of mitomycin c on endoscopic lacrimal surgery. Br J Opthalmol 82:63–66

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Deka A, Bhattacharjee K, Bhuyan SK, Bhattacharjee H, Khaund G (2006) Effect of mitomycin c on ostium in dacryocystorhinostomy. Clin Exp Opthalmol 34:557–561

    Google Scholar 

  15. Unlu HH, Gunhan K, Baser EF, Songu M (2009) Long term results in endoscopic dacryocystorhinosotmy: Is intubation really required? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 140:589–595

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abhineet Lall.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (MPG 38078 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kirtane, M.V., Lall, A., Chavan, K. et al. Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy with Flap Suturing. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 65 (Suppl 2), 236–241 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-011-0354-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-011-0354-z

Keywords

Navigation