Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

G-CSF use in patients receiving first-line chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) and granulocyte-colony stimulating factors (G-CSF) as observed in clinical practice in Italy

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Medical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) requires chemotherapy regimens with significant risk of febrile neutropenia (FN). For patients at ≥20% FN risk, guidelines recommend primary prophylaxis (PP) with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF). This study assessed whether G-CSF use in NHL was in line with recommendations in routine practice. This was a retrospective, observational study of adult NHL patients receiving first-line (R)CHOP-like chemotherapy and G-CSF support between June 2010 and 2012, in Italy. The primary outcome was whether G-CSF was provided as PP, which was defined as G-CSF initiation on days 1–3 after chemotherapy, ≥3 days’ use for daily G-CSFs and continued prophylaxis from cycle 1 across all cycles. Secondary prophylaxis was defined as continued prophylaxis from cycle 2 or later, and all other use was defined as Suboptimal. The analysis included 199 patients, 61% of whom had diffuse large B cell lymphoma and 21% follicular lymphoma. (R)CHOP-21 was given to 52% of patients and (R)CHOP-14 to 32%. Overall, 29% of patients received PP, while two-thirds received Suboptimal G-CSF. Of patients receiving daily G-CSF, 3% received PP and 94% received Suboptimal use; with pegfilgrastim, 65% received PP and 26% Suboptimal use. FN occurred in 13 patients (7%) and grade 3/4 neutropenia in 43%. Chemotherapy dose delays occurred in 22% and dose reductions in 18% of patients. Delivery of G-CSF, particularly daily G-CSFs, was not in accordance with guideline or product label recommendations in a large proportion of NHL patients receiving chemotherapy in Italy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram II, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2014;136:E359–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. The Italian Association of Cancer Registries (AIRTUM). Prevalence and cure of cancer in Italy: non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Epidemiol Prev. 2014;38:85.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ghielmini M, Vitolo U, Kimby E, Montoto S, Walewski J, Pfreundschuh M, et al. ESMO guidelines consensus conference on malignant lymphoma 2011 part 1: diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular lymphoma (FL) and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Ann Oncol. 2013;24:561–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas [V2.2015]. 2015 [cited 2015 May 21]. http://www.nccn.org.

  5. Lyman GH, Delgado DJ. Risk and timing of hospitalization for febrile neutropenia in patients receiving CHOP, CHOP-R, or CNOP chemotherapy for intermediate-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Cancer. 2003;98:2402–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pettengell R, Schwenkglenks M, Leonard R, Bosly A, Paridaens R, Constenla M, et al. Neutropenia occurrence and predictors of reduced chemotherapy delivery: results from the INC-EU prospective observational European neutropenia study. Support Care Cancer. 2008;16:1299–309.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dale DC, McCarter GC, Crawford J, Lyman GH. Myelotoxicity and dose intensity of chemotherapy: reporting practices from randomized clinical trials. JNCCN. 2003;1:440–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Aapro MS, Bohlius J, Cameron DA, Dal Lago L, Donnelly JP, Kearney N, et al. 2010 update of EORTC guidelines for the use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor to reduce the incidence of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in adult patients with lymphoproliferative disorders and solid tumours. Eur J Cancer. 2011;47:8–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Crawford J, Dale DC, Lyman GH. Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia: risks, consequences, and new directions for its management. Cancer. 2004;100:228–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lyman GH, Michels SL, Reynolds MW, Barron R, Tomic KS, Yu J. Risk of mortality in patients with cancer who experience febrile neutropenia. Cancer. 2010;116:5555–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kuderer NM, Dale DC, Crawford J, Cosler LE, Lyman GH. Mortality, morbidity, and cost associated with febrile neutropenia in adult cancer patients. Cancer. 2006;106:2258–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dulisse B, Li X, Gayle JA, Barron RL, Ernst FR, Rothman KJ, et al. A retrospective study of the clinical and economic burden during hospitalizations among cancer patients with febrile neutropenia. J Med Econ. 2013;16:720–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pettengell R, Johnsen HE, Johnson HE, Lugtenburg PJ, Silvestre AS, Dührsen U, et al. Impact of febrile neutropenia on R-CHOP chemotherapy delivery and hospitalizations among patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Support Care Cancer. 2012;20:647–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pettengell R, Schwenkglenks M, Bosly A. Association of reduced relative dose intensity and survival in lymphoma patients receiving CHOP-21 chemotherapy. Ann Hematol. 2008;87:429–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Lyman GH. Impact of chemotherapy dose intensity on cancer patient outcomes. J Natl Comp Cancer Netw. 2009;7:99–108.

    Google Scholar 

  16. de Miguel SC, Calleja-Hernández MÁ, Menjón-Beltrán S, Vallejo-Rodríguez I. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors as prophylaxis against febrile neutropenia. Support Care Cancer. 2015;23:547–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Crawford J, Caserta C, Roila F. Hematopoietic growth factors: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for the applications. Ann Oncol. 2010;21:248–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: myeloid growth factors [v.2.2014]. 2014. www.nccn.org.

  19. Associazione Italiana di Oncologia Medica (AIOM). Linee guida—Gestione della tossicita’ ematopoietica in Oncologia. 2014 [cited 2015 May 17]. www.aiom.it.

  20. Pfreundschuh M, Schubert J, Ziepert M, Schmits R, Mohren M, Lengfelder E, et al. Six versus eight cycles of bi-weekly CHOP-14 with or without rituximab in elderly patients with aggressive CD20+ B-cell lymphomas: a randomised controlled trial (RICOVER-60). Lancet Oncol. 2008;9:105–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Balducci L, Al-Halawani H, Charu V, Tam J, Shahin S, Dreiling L, et al. Elderly cancer patients receiving chemotherapy benefit from first-cycle pegfilgrastim. Oncologist. 2007;12:1416–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Osby E, Hagberg H, Kvaløy S, Teerenhovi L, Anderson H, Cavallin-Stahl E, et al. CHOP is superior to CNOP in elderly patients with aggressive lymphoma while outcome is unaffected by filgrastim treatment: results of a Nordic lymphoma group randomized trial. Blood. 2003;101:3840–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pfreundschuh M. How I treat elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Blood. 2010;116:5103–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Amgen Europe B.V. Neupogen® (filgrastim) summary of product characteristics (Granulokine® is the Italian brand name for Neupogen®). [cited 2015 May 17]. www.mhra.gov.uk.

  25. Chugai Pharma UK Ltd. Granocyte® (lenograstim) summary of product characteristics. [cited 2015 May 17]. www.mhra.gov.uk.

  26. Amgen Europe B.V. Neulasta® (pegfilgrastim) summary of product characteristics. 2014. www.ema.europa.eu.

  27. Arvedson T, O’Kelly J, Yang B-B, O’Kelly J, Yang B-B. Design rationale and development approach for pegfilgrastim as a long-acting granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. BioDrugs. 2015;29:185–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. European Medicines Agency. [cited 2015 Nov 15]. http://www.ema.europa.eu.

  29. Hoggatt J, Tate TA, Pelus LM. Role of lipegfilgrastim in the management of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. Int J Nanomed. 2015;10:2647–52.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Johnsen HE, Haioun C, Lugtenburg PJ, Salar A, Jaeger U, Pettengell R, et al. Importance of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis in therapy with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone given every 14 days for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in routine clinical practice. Leuk Lymphoma. 2012;53:982–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Salar A, Haioun C, Rossi FG, Duehrsen U, Pettengell R, Johnsen HE, et al. The need for improved neutropenia risk assessment in DLBCL patients receiving R-CHOP-21: findings from clinical practice. Leuk Res. 2012;36:548–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lugtenburg P, Silvestre AS, Rossi FG, Noens L, Krall W, Bendall K, et al. Impact of age group on febrile neutropenia risk assessment and management in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with R-CHOP regimens. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2012;12:297–305.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Barni S, Lorusso V, Giordano M, Sogno G, Gamucci T, Santoro A, et al. A prospective observational study to evaluate G-CSF usage in patients with solid tumors receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy in Italian clinical oncology practice. Med Oncol. 2014;31:797.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Wildiers H, Reiser M. Relative dose intensity of chemotherapy and its impact on outcomes in patients with early breast cancer or aggressive lymphoma. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2011;77:221–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Lyman GH, Dale DC, Friedberg J, Crawford J, Fisher RI. Incidence and predictors of low chemotherapy dose-intensity in aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: a nationwide study. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:4302–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Weycker D, Hackett J, Edelsberg JS, Oster G, Glass AG. Are shorter courses of filgrastim prophylaxis associated with increased risk of hospitalization? Ann Pharmacother. 2006;40:402–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Lyman GH, Dale DC, Culakova E, Poniewierski MS, Wolff DA, Kuderer NM, et al. The impact of the granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on chemotherapy dose intensity and cancer survival: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Oncol. 2013;24:2475–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Weycker D, Barron R, Edelsberg J, Kartashov A, Legg J, Glass AG. Risk and consequences of chemotherapy-induced neutropenic complications in patients receiving daily filgrastim: the importance of duration of prophylaxis. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:189.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Luminari S, Montanini A, Caballero D, Bologna S, Notter M, Dyer MJS, et al. Nonpegylated liposomal doxorubicin (MyocetTM) combination (R-COMP) chemotherapy in elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL): results from the phase II EUR018 trial. Ann Oncol. 2010;21:1492–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Fagnani D, Isa L, Verga MF, Nova P, Casartelli C, Filipazzi V, et al. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors used in clinical practice: PoloNord Registry-Based Cohort Italian Study. Tumori. 2014;100:491–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Wang L, Baser O, Kutikova L, Page JH, Barron R. The impact of primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factors on febrile neutropenia during chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Support Care Cancer. 2015;23:3131–40.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Pfeil AM, Allcott K, Pettengell R, von Minckwitz G, Schwenkglenks M, Szabo Z. Efficacy, effectiveness and safety of long-acting granulocyte colony-stimulating factors for prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in patients with cancer: a systematic review. Support Care Cancer. 2015;23:525–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Smith TJ, Bohlke K, Lyman GH, Carson KR, Crawford J, Cross SJ, et al. Recommendations for the use of WBC growth factors: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:3199–212.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was sponsored by Amgen.

Author’s contributions

Authors UV, FA and MF conducted the clinical research, and all authors were responsible for the study conduct, as well as interpretation and reporting of the data. With financial support from Amgen, Claudio Iannacone, Sparc Consulting, Milan, Italy, provided statistical support, Giovanna DiTuri, McCann Complete Medical, Milan, Italy, provided project management support and helped to develop the eCRF and Linda Woodford, Claris2 GmbH, Zug, Switzerland, provided medical writing support. James O’Kelly, Amgen Ltd, provided critical review of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sally Wetten.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Authors LD and SW are employees of Amgen and own shares in Amgen. Authors UV, FA and MF have received consultation fees from Amgen. Author UV has received honoraria for speaking at symposia from Roche, Celgene, Janssen, Takeda and Gilead and has participated in advisory boards for Roche and Janssen.

Ethical approval

Approval was obtained from the Ethics Committees of the University Hospital San Giovanni Battista, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Province of Modena, University Hospital Careggi, University Hospital San Andrea, University of Pescara, University Hospital “Policlinico—Vittorio Emanuele”, IRCCS Ospedale Oncologico di Bari and the Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore—University Hospital Agostino Gemelli in Italy. All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vitolo, U., Angrili, F., DeCosta, L. et al. G-CSF use in patients receiving first-line chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) and granulocyte-colony stimulating factors (G-CSF) as observed in clinical practice in Italy. Med Oncol 33, 139 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-016-0850-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-016-0850-9

Keywords

Navigation