Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prioritization and Timing of Outcomes and Endpoints After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage in Clinical Trials and Observational Studies: Proposal of a Multidisciplinary Research Group

  • Special Article
  • Published:
Neurocritical Care Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

In studies on aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), substantial variability exists in the use and timing of outcomes and endpoints, which complicates interpretation and comparison of results between studies. The aim of the National Institute of Health/National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke/National Library of Medicine Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysm (UIA) and SAH common data elements (CDE) Project was to provide a common structure for future UIA and SAH research.

Methods

This article summarizes the recommendations of the UIA and SAH CDE Outcomes and Endpoints subgroup, which consisted of an international and multidisciplinary ad hoc panel of experts in clinical outcomes after SAH. Consensus recommendations were developed by review of previously published CDEs for other neurological diseases and the SAH literature. Recommendations for CDEs were classified by priority into “Core,” “Supplemental—Highly Recommended,” “Supplemental,” and “Exploratory.”

Results

The subgroup identified over 50 outcomes measures and template case report forms (CRFs) to be included as part of the UIA and SAH CDE recommendations. None was classified as “Core”. The modified Rankin Scale score and Montreal Cognitive Assessment were considered the preferred outcomes and classified as Supplemental—Highly Recommended. Death, Glasgow Outcome Scale score, and Glasgow Outcome Scale-extended were classified as Supplemental. All other outcome measures were categorized as “Exploratory”. We propose outcome assessment at 3 months and at 12 months for studies interested in long-term outcomes. We give recommendations for standardized dichotomization.

Conclusion

The recommended outcome measures and CRFs have been distilled from a broad pool of potentially useful CDEs, scales, instruments, and endpoints. The adherence to these recommendations will facilitate the comparison of results across studies and meta-analyses of individual patient data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lovelock CE, Rinkel GJ, Rothwell PM. Time trends in outcome of subarachnoid hemorrhage: population-based study and systematic review. Neurology. 2010;74(19):1494–501.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Vergouwen MD, Jong-Tjien-Fa AV, Algra A, Rinkel GJ. Time trends in causes of death after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a hospital-based study. Neurology. 2016;86(1):59–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Al-Khindi T, Macdonald RL, Schweizer TA. Cognitive and functional outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke. 2010;41(8):e519–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Stienen MN, Weisshaupt R, Fandino J, et al. Current practice in neuropsychological outcome reporting after aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2013;155(11):2045–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zweifel-Zehnder AE, Stienen MN, Chicherio C, et al. Call for uniform neuropsychological assessment after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: Swiss recommendations. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2015;157(9):1449–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Suarez JI, Sheikh MK, Macdonald RL, et al. Common data elements for Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms and subarachnoid hemorrhage clinical research: a National Institute for Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Library of Medicine, and Neurocritical Care Society Project. Neurocrit Care 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-019-00723-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Maas AI, Harrison-Felix CL, Menon D, et al. Standardizing data collection in traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2011;28(2):177–87.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Loring DW, Lowenstein DH, Barbaro NM, et al. Common data elements in epilepsy research: development and implementation of the NINDS epilepsy CDE project. Epilepsia. 2011;52(6):1186–91.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Saver JL, Warach S, Janis S, et al. Standardizing the structure of stroke clinical and epidemiologic research data: the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) Stroke Common Data Element (CDE) project. Stroke. 2012;43(4):967–73.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF2001, Geneva: World Health Organization (WHO).

  11. Stienen MN, Germans M, Burkhardt JK, et al. Predictors of in-hospital death after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: analysis of a nationwide database (Swiss SOS [Swiss Study on Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage]). Stroke. 2018;49(2):333–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. McDougall CG, Spetzler RF, Zabramski JM, et al. The barrow ruptured aneurysm trial. J Neurosurg. 2012;116(1):135–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schatlo B, Fung C, Fathi AR, et al. Introducing a nationwide registry: the Swiss study on aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (Swiss SOS). Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2012;154(12):2173–8 (discussion 8).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Molyneux A, Kerr R, Stratton I, et al. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2002;360(9342):1267–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wong GK, Chan DY, Siu DY, et al. High-dose simvastatin for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: multicenter randomized controlled double-blinded clinical trial. Stroke. 2015;46(2):382–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kirkpatrick PJ, Turner CL, Smith C, et al. Simvastatin in aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (STASH): a multicentre randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13(7):666–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Senbokuya N, Kinouchi H, Kanemaru K, et al. Effects of cilostazol on cerebral vasospasm after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a multicenter prospective, randomized, open-label blinded end point trial. J Neurosurg. 2013;118(1):121–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dorhout Mees SM, Algra A, Vandertop WP, et al. Magnesium for aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (MASH-2): a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2012;380(9836):44–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Al-Tamimi YZ, Bhargava D, Feltbower RG, et al. Lumbar drainage of cerebrospinal fluid after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial (LUMAS). Stroke. 2012;43(3):677–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Siironen J, Juvela S, Varis J, et al. No effect of enoxaparin on outcome of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. J Neurosurg. 2003;99(6):953–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yamamoto T, Mori K, Esaki T, et al. Preventive effect of continuous cisternal irrigation with magnesium sulfate solution on angiographic cerebral vasospasms associated with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhages: a randomized controlled trial. J Neurosurg. 2016;124(1):18–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Suarez JI, Martin RH, Calvillo E, et al. The Albumin in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (ALISAH) multicenter pilot clinical trial: safety and neurologic outcomes. Stroke. 2012;43(3):683–90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Wong GK, Poon WS, Chan MT, et al. Intravenous magnesium sulphate for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (IMASH): a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, multicenter phase III trial. Stroke. 2010;41(5):921–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Konczalla J, Schmitz J, Kashefiolasl S, et al. Non-aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage in 173 patients: a prospective study of long-term outcome. Eur J Neurol. 2015;22(10):1329–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Matsuda N, Naraoka M, Ohkuma H, et al. Effect of cilostazol on cerebral vasospasm and outcome in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016;42(1–2):97–105.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Etminan N, Beseoglu K, Eicker SO, et al. Prospective, randomized, open-label phase II trial on concomitant intraventricular fibrinolysis and low-frequency rotation after severe subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke. 2013;44(8):2162–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Todd MM, Hindman BJ, Clarke WR, Torner JC. Intraoperative hypothermia for aneurysm surgery trial, I. Mild intraoperative hypothermia during surgery for intracranial aneurysm. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(2):135–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Gomis P, Graftieaux JP, Sercombe R, et al. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, pilot trial of high-dose methylprednisolone in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg. 2010;112(3):681–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Tseng MY, Hutchinson PJ, Richards HK, et al. Acute systemic erythropoietin therapy to reduce delayed ischemic deficits following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a Phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Clinical article. J Neurosurg. 2009;111(1):171–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bulters DO, Birch AA, Hickey E, et al. A randomized controlled trial of prophylactic intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in high-risk aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke. 2013;44(1):224–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Pickard JD, Murray GD, Illingworth R, et al. Effect of oral nimodipine on cerebral infarction and outcome after subarachnoid haemorrhage: British aneurysm nimodipine trial. BMJ. 1989;298(6674):636–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Macdonald RL, Higashida RT, Keller E, et al. Clazosentan, an endothelin receptor antagonist, in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage undergoing surgical clipping: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial (CONSCIOUS-2). Lancet Neurol. 2011;10(7):618–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kim DH, Haney CLVan, Ginhoven G. Utility of outcome measures after treatment for intracranial aneurysms: a prospective trial involving 520 patients. Stroke. 2005;36(4):792–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Garg K, Sinha S, Kale SS, et al. Role of simvastatin in prevention of vasospasm and improving functional outcome after aneurysmal sub-arachnoid hemorrhage: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot trial. Br J Neurosurg. 2013;27(2):181–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Schweizer TA, Al-Khindi T, Macdonald RL. Mini-mental state examination versus Montreal Cognitive Assessment: rapid assessment tools for cognitive and functional outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurol Sci. 2012;316(1–2):137–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Wong GK, Lam S, Ngai K, et al. Evaluation of cognitive impairment by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: prevalence, risk factors and correlations with 3 month outcomes. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2012;83(11):1112–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. King JT Jr, DiLuna ML, Cicchetti DV, Tsevat J, Roberts MS. Cognitive functioning in patients with cerebral aneurysms measured with the mini mental state examination and the telephone interview for cognitive status. Neurosurgery. 2006;59(4):803–10 (discussion 10-1).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Macdonald RL, Hunsche E, Schuler R, Wlodarczyk J, Mayer SA. Quality of life and healthcare resource use associated with angiographic vasospasm after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke. 2012;43(4):1082–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Mayer SA, Kreiter KT, Copeland D, et al. Global and domain-specific cognitive impairment and outcome after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurology. 2002;59(11):1750–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Wong GK, Lam SW, Wong A, et al. Comparison of Montreal Cognitive Assessment and mini-mental state examination in evaluating cognitive domain deficit following aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(4):e59946.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Wong GK, Lam SW, Wong A, et al. MoCA-assessed cognitive function and excellent outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage at 1 year. Eur J Neurol. 2014;21(5):725–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Powell J, Kitchen N, Heslin J, Greenwood R. Psychosocial outcomes at three and nine months after good neurological recovery from aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: predictors and prognosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002;72(6):772–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Powell J, Kitchen N, Heslin J, Greenwood R. Psychosocial outcomes at 18 months after good neurological recovery from aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004;75(8):1119–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Stienen MN, Smoll NR, Weisshaupt R, et al. Delayed cerebral ischemia predicts neurocognitive impairment following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. World Neurosurg. 2014;82(5):e599–605.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Boosman H, Passier PE, Visser-Meily JM, Rinkel GJ, Post MW. Validation of the Stroke Specific Quality of Life scale in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010;81(5):485–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. van der Schaaf IC, Wermer MJ, Velthuis BK, et al. Psychosocial impact of finding small aneurysms that are left untreated in patients previously operated on for ruptured aneurysms. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2006;77(6):748–52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Visser-Meily JM, Rinkel GJ, Vergouwen MD, et al. Post-traumatic stress disorder in patients 3 years after aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013;36(2):126–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Kutlubaev MA, Barugh AJ, Mead GE. Fatigue after subarachnoid haemorrhage: a systematic review. J Psychosom Res. 2012;72(4):305–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Vos EM, Greebe P, Visser-Meily JM, Rinkel GJ, Vergouwen MD. Subjective hearing impairment after subarachnoid haemorrhage: prevalence and risk factors. J Neurol Sci. 2017;372:184–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Bor AS, Niemansburg SL, Wermer MJ, Rinkel GJ. Anosmia after coiling of ruptured aneurysms: prevalence, prognosis, and risk factors. Stroke. 2009;40(6):2226–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Post MW, van der Zee CH, Hennink J, et al. Validity of the utrecht scale for evaluation of rehabilitation-participation. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(6):478–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. van der Zee CH, Priesterbach AR, van der Dussen L, et al. Reproducibility of three self-report participation measures: the ICF Measure of Participation and Activities Screener, the Participation Scale, and the Utrecht Scale for evaluation of rehabilitation-participation. J Rehabil Med. 2010;42(8):752–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Backes D, Rinkel GJ, van der Schaaf IC, et al. Recovery to preinterventional functioning, return-to-work, and life satisfaction after treatment of unruptured aneurysms. Stroke. 2015;46(6):1607–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Harris C. Factors influencing return to work after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosci Nurs. 2014;46(4):207–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Wallmark S, Ronne-Engstrom E, Lundstrom E. Predicting return to work after subarachnoid hemorrhage using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2016;158(2):233–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Passier PE, Visser-Meily JM, Rinkel GJ, Lindeman E, Post MW. Life satisfaction and return to work after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2011;20(4):324–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Nishino A, Sakurai Y, Tsuji I, et al. Resumption of work after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage in middle-aged Japanese patients. J Neurosurg. 1999;90(1):59–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Lindberg M, Angquist KA, Fodstad H, Fugl-Meyer K, Fugl-Meyer AR. Self-reported prevalence of disability after subarachnoid haemorrhage, with special emphasis on return to leisure and work. Br J Neurosurg. 1992;6(4):297–304.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Stienen MN, Smoll NR, Fung C, et al. Home-time as a surrogate marker for functional outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke. 2018;49(12):3081–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Naidech AM, Beaumont JL, Berman M, et al. Web-based assessment of outcomes after subarachnoid and intracerebral hemorrhage: a new patient centered option for outcomes assessment. Neurocrit Care. 2015;23(1):22–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Meyer B, Ringel F, Winter Y, et al. Health-Related Quality of Life in patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2010;30(4):423–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Ronne-Engstrom E, Enblad P, Lundstrom E. Outcome after spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage measured with the EQ-5D. Stroke. 2011;42(11):3284–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. von Vogelsang AC, Burstrom K, Wengstrom Y, Svensson M, Forsberg C. Health-Related Quality of Life 10 years after intracranial aneurysm rupture: a retrospective cohort study using EQ-5D. Neurosurgery. 2013;72(3):397–405 (discussion-6).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Barth M, Thome C, Schmiedek P, et al. Characterization of functional outcome and quality of life following subarachnoid hemorrhage in patients treated with and without nicardipine prolonged-release implants. J Neurosurg. 2009;110(5):955–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Schwyzer L, Soleman E, Ensner R, et al. Quality of life and outcome after treatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms: results of a single center in Switzerland. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2015;120:197–201.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Tjahjadi M, Heinen C, Konig R, et al. Health-Related Quality of Life after spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage measured in a recent patient population. World Neurosurg. 2013;79(2):296–307.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. King JT Jr, Horowitz MB, Kassam AB, Yonas H, Roberts MS. The short form-12 and the measurement of health status in patients with cerebral aneurysms: performance, validity, and reliability. J Neurosurg. 2005;102(3):489–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Wong GK, Lam SW, Ngai K, et al. Validation of the Stroke-specific Quality of Life for patients after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage and proposed summary subscores. J Neurol Sci. 2012;320(1–2):97–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Wong GK, Lee A, Wong A, et al. Clinically important difference of Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Clin Neurosci. 2016;33:209–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Wong GK, Lam SW, Ngai K, et al. Development of a short form of Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale for patients after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurol Sci. 2013;335(1–2):204–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Post MW, Boosman H, van Zandvoort MM, et al. Development and validation of a short version of the Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2011;82(3):283–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Campi A, Ramzi N, Molyneux AJ, et al. Retreatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms in patients randomized by coiling or clipping in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT). Stroke. 2007;38(5):1538–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. de Oliveira Manoel AL, van der Jagt M, Amin-Hanjani S, et al. Common data elements for Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms and aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: recommendations from a working group on hospital course and acute therapies—proposal of a multidisciplinary research group. Neurocrit Care 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-019-00726-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Investigators C. Rates of delayed rebleeding from intracranial aneurysms are low after surgical and endovascular treatment. Stroke. 2006;37(6):1437–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Johnston SC, Dowd CF, Higashida RT, et al. Predictors of rehemorrhage after treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: the Cerebral Aneurysm Rerupture After Treatment (CARAT) study. Stroke. 2008;39(1):120–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Molyneux AJ, Birks J, Clarke A, Sneade M, Kerr RS. The durability of endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping of ruptured cerebral aneurysms: 18 year follow-up of the UK cohort of the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT). Lancet. 2015;385(9969):691–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Fisseni HJ. Lehrbuch der psychologischen Diagnostik. 3 ed, Göttingen: Hogrefe; 2004.

  78. Lienert GA, Raatz U. Testaufbau und Testanalyse. 6 ed, Weinheim: Beltz Psychologie Verlags-Union; 1998.

  79. Hutter BO, Gilsbach JM. Which neuropsychological deficits are hidden behind a good outcome (Glasgow = I) after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage? Neurosurgery. 1993;33(6):999–1005 (discussion-6).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Kruisheer EM, Huenges Wajer IM, Visser-Meily JM, Post MW. Course of participation after subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2017;26(5):1000–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.11.124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Passier PE, Visser-Meily JM, van Zandvoort MJ, et al. Predictors of long-term Health-Related Quality of Life in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. NeuroRehabilitation. 2012;30(2):137–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Holman R, Weisscher N, Glas CA, et al. The Academic Medical Center Linear Disability Score (ALDS) item bank: item response theory analysis in a mixed patient population. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2005;3:83.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Krajewski K, Dombek S, Martens T, et al. Neuropsychological assessments in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, perimesencephalic SAH, and incidental aneurysms. Neurosurg Rev. 2014;37(1):55–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Zimmermann P, Fimm B. TAP—Testbatterie zur Aufmerksamkeitsprüfung (Version 2.3). Herzogenrath: Psytest; 2007.

  85. Haug T, Sorteberg A, Sorteberg W, et al. Cognitive functioning and health related quality of life after rupture of an aneurysm on the anterior communicating artery versus middle cerebral artery. Br J Neurosurg. 2009;23(5):507–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Metzler P. Standardisierte Link’sche Probe zur Beurteilung exekutiver Funktionen (SLP). Manual. Frankfurt a. M: Swets Test Services; 2000.

  87. Kreiter KT, Copeland D, Bernardini GL, et al. Predictors of cognitive dysfunction after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke. 2002;33(1):200–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Wong GK, Lam SW, Chan SS, et al. Neuropsychiatric disturbance after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Clin Neurosci. 2014;21(10):1695–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Boerboom W, Heijenbrok-Kal MH, Khajeh L, van Kooten F, Ribbers GM. Long-term functioning of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a 4-yr follow-up study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;95(2):112–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Buchanan KM, Elias LJ, Goplen GB. Differing perspectives on outcome after subarachnoid hemorrhage: the patient, the relative, the neurosurgeon. Neurosurgery. 2000;46(4):831–8 (discussion 8–40).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The views expressed here are those of the authors and do not represent those of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), or the US Government.

Funding

Logistical support for this project was provided in part through NIH Contract HHSN271201200034C, the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, NLM, The Neurocritical Care Society, and the CHI Baylor St Luke’s Medical Center in Houston, TX. The development of the NINDS SAH CDEs was made possible thanks to the great investment of time and effort of WG members and the members of the NINDS CDE Project and NLM CDE Project teams participating from 2015 to 2017.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Contributions

MNS, JV-M, TAS, DH, RLM, and MDIV wrote and edited the manuscript. The corresponding author confirms that authorship requirements have been met, the final manuscript was approved by all authors, and this manuscript has not been published elsewhere and is not under consideration by another journal. The UIA and SAH CDEs Project adhered to ethical guidelines.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin N. Stienen.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

Dr Macdonald reports personal fees from Edge Therapeutics and grants from Brain Aneurysm Foundation, outside the submitted work. Dr Stienen reports grants from Fujirebio Europe and Actelion/Idorsia, outside of the submitted work. Dr Vergouwen, Dr Visser-Meily, Dr Schweizer, and Dr Hänggi have nothing to disclose.

Ethical Approval/Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms and SAH CDE Project Investigators members are listed in Appendix.

Appendix: UIA and SAH Working Group Members

Appendix: UIA and SAH Working Group Members

Steering Committee

Jose I Suarez, MD, FNCS, FANA, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, co - Chair

R Loch Macdonald, MD, PhD, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, co - Chair

Sepideh Amin-Hanjani, MD, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL

Robert D. Brown, Jr., MD, MPH, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

Airton Leonardo de Oliveira Manoel, MD, PhD, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Colin P Derdeyn, MD, FACR, University of Iowa, Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA

Nima Etminan, MD, University Hospital Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany

Emanuela Keller, MD, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

Peter D. LeRoux, MD, FACS, Main Line Health, Wynnewood, PA

Stephan Mayer, MD, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI

Akio Morita, MD, PhD, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan

Gabriel Rinkel, MD, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Daniel Rüfenacht, MD, Klinik Hirslanden, Zurich, Switzerland

Martin N. Stienen, MD, FEBNS, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

James Torner, MSc, PhD, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA

Mervyn D.I. Vergouwen, MD, PhD, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands

George K. C. Wong, MD, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong


Subject Characteristics Working Group

Robert D. Brown, Jr., MD, MPH, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, co-Chair

Akio Morita, MD, PhD, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan, co-Chair

Philippe Bijlenga, MD, PhD, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland (Superuser)

Nerissa Ko, MD; Cameron G McDougall, MD; J Mocco, MS, MD; Yuuichi Murayama, MD; Marieke J H Werner, MD, PhD


Assessments and Examinations Working Group

Stephan Mayer, MD, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, co-Chair

Jose I Suarez, MD, FNCS, FANA, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, co-Chair

Rahul Damani, MD, MPH, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX (Superuser)

Joseph Broderick, MD; Raj Dhar, MD, FRCPC; Edward C Jauch, MD, MS, FACEP, FAHA; Peter J Kirkpatrick; Renee H Martin, PhD; J Mocco, MS, MD; Susanne Muehlschlegel, MD, MPH; Tatsushi Mutoh, MD, DVM, PhD; Paul Nyquist, MD, MPH; Daiwai Olson, RN, PhD; Jorge H Mejia-Mantilla, MD, MSc.


Hospital Course and Acute Therapies Working Group

Sepideh Amin-Hanjani, MD, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, co-Chair

Airton Leonardo de Oliveira Manoel, MD, PhD, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, co-Chair (Superuser)

Mathieu van der Jagt, MD, PhD, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands (Superuser)

Nicholas Bambakidis, MD; Gretchen Brophy, PharmD, BCPS, FCCP, FCCM, FNCS; Ketan Bulsara, MD; Jan Claassen, MD, PhD; E Sander Connolly, MD, FACS; S Alan Hoffer, MD; Brian L Hoh, MD, FACS; Robert G Holloway, MD, MPH; Adam Kelly, MD; Stephan Mayer, MD; Peter Nakaji, MD; Alejandro Rabinstein, MD; Jose I Suarez, MD, FNCS, FANA; Peter Vajkoczy, MD; Mervyn D. I. Vergouwen, MD, PhD; Henry Woo, MD; Gregory J Zipfel, MD.


Biospecimens and Biomarkers Working Group

Emanuela Keller, MD, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland, co-Chair (Superuser)

R Loch Macdonald, MD, PhD, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, co-Chair

Sherry Chou, MD, MMSc; Sylvain Doré, PhD, FAHA; Aaron S Dumont, MD; Murat Gunel, MD, FACS, FAHA; Hidetoshi Kasuya, MD; Alexander Roederer, PhD; Ynte Ruigrok, MD; Paul M Vespa, MD, FCCM, FAAN, FANA, FNCS; Asita Simone Sarrafzadeh-Khorrasani, PhD.


Imaging Working Group

Colin P Derdeyn, MD, FACR, University of Iowa, Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, co-Chair

Nima Etminan, MD University Hospital Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany, co-Chair

Katharina Hackenberg, MD, University Hospital Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany (Superuser)

John Huston, III, MD; Timo Krings, MD, PhD, FRCPC; Giuseppe Lanzino, MD; Philip M Meyers, MD, FACR, FSIR, FAHA; Gabriel Rinkel, MD; Daniel Rüfenacht, MD; Max Wintermark, MD.


Long-Term Therapies Working Group

James Torner, MSc, PhD, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, co-Chair (Superuser)

George K. C. Wong, MD, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, co-Chair (Superuser)

Joseph Broderick, MD; Janis Daly, PhD, MS; Christopher Ogilvy, MD; Denise H Rhoney, PharmD, FCCP, FCCM, FNCS; YB Roos, PhD; Adnan Siddiqui, MD, PhD, FAHA.


Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Working Group

Nima Etminan, MD, University Hospital Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany, co-Chair

Gabriel Rinkel, MD, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands, co-Chair

Katharina Hackenberg, MD, University Hospital Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany (Superuser)

Ale Algra, MD, FAHA; Juhanna Frösen, MD; David Hasan, MD; Seppo Juvela, MD, PhD; David J Langer, MD; Philip M Meyers, MD, FACR, FSIR, FAHA; Akio Morita, MD, PhD; Rustam Al-Shahi Salman, MA, PhD, FRCP.


Outcomes and Endpoints Working Group

Martin N. Stienen, MD, FEBNS, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland, co-Chair (Superuser)

Mervyn D.I. Vergouwen, MD, PhD, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands, co-Chair

Daniel Hänggi, MD; R Loch Macdonald, MD, PhD; Tom Schweizer, PhD; Johanna Visser-Meily, MD, PhD.


National Library of Medicine CDE Team

Liz Amos, MLIS, National Information Center on Health Services Research and Health Care Technology, National Library of Medicine

Christophe Ludet, MS, National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD


NINDS CDE Team

Claudia Moy, PhD, NINDS, Bethesda, MD

Joanne Odenkirchen, MPH, NINDS, Bethesda, MD

Sherita Ala’i, MS, The Emmes Corporation, Rockville, MD

Joy Esterlitz, MS, The Emmes Corporation, Rockville, MD

Kristen Joseph, MA, The Emmes Corporation, Rockville, MD

Muniza Sheikh, MS, MBA, The Emmes Corporation, Rockville, MD

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stienen, M.N., Visser-Meily, J.M., Schweizer, T.A. et al. Prioritization and Timing of Outcomes and Endpoints After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage in Clinical Trials and Observational Studies: Proposal of a Multidisciplinary Research Group. Neurocrit Care 30 (Suppl 1), 102–113 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-019-00737-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-019-00737-0

Keywords

Navigation