Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal Cefazolin Prophylactic Dosing for Bariatric Surgery: No Need for Higher Doses or Intraoperative Redosing

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The goal of this pharmacokinetic (PK) study was to evaluate whether a single 2-g prophylactic dose of cefazolin given (IV) bolus provides effective protective cefazolin levels for prophylaxis against methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA), the primary skin pathogen in bariatric surgery.

Materials and Methods

Thirty-seven patients having gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy received cefazolin 2-g preoperative prophylaxis. Serum, subcutaneous adipose tissue, and deep peri-gastric adipose tissue specimens were collected at incision and before skin closure. Cefazolin concentrations in serum and adipose tissue were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography.

Results

Penetration of cefazolin, a water soluble antibiotic, into adipose tissue was only 6–8 % of simultaneous serum levels. However, cefazolin tissue concentrations in all adipose tissue specimens, exceeded mean MIC for MSSA.

Conclusions

Prophylactic cefazolin, given as a single 2 g (IV bolus 3–5 min before skin incision) was more than adequate in providing protective cefazolin levels for the duration of bariatric surgery. Cefazolin 2 g (IV dose bolus given just before skin incision) achieves protective adipose tissue levels (> MIC of MSSA) for the duration (usually < 4 h) of bariatric surgical procedures. In this study, cefazolin 2 g (IV bolus) provided protective adipose tissue levels for 4.8 h. Since cefazolin is a water soluble antibiotic (V d = 0.2 L/Kg), penetration into adipose tissue is not V d not dose-dependent. Extremely high-dosed cefazolin, i.e., 3 or 4 g is excessive and unnecessary for bariatric surgery prophylaxis. A single cefazolin 2 g preoperative dose also eliminates the need for intraoperative redosing at 4 h.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Christou N, Jarand J, Sylvestre J, et al. Analysis of the incidence and risk factors for wound infections in open bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2004;14:16–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bratzler D, Dellinger EP, Olsen K, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2013;70:195–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Quintilliani R, Nightingale CH. Cefazolin. Ann Intern Med. 1978;89:650–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Grayson ML, Crow SM, McCarthy JS, et al. In: Grayson ML editor. Kucer’s the use of antibiotics: a clinical review of antibacterial, antifungal and antiviral drugs. (6th ed.) Hoddder Arnold: London; 2010. p. 257–74.

  5. Cunha BA, editor. Antibiotic essentials. 14th ed. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers; 2015. p. 557–9.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Janson B, Thursky K. Dosing of antibiotics in obesity. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2012;25:634–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ho V, Nicolau D, Dakin GF, et al. Cefazolin dosing for surgical prophylaxis in morbidly obese patients. Surg Infect. 2012;13:33–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. van Kralingen S, Taks M, Diepstraten J, et al. Pharmacokinetics and protein binding of cefazolin in morbidly obese patients. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2011;67:985–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Shabanzedeh DM, Sorensen LT. Laparoscopic surgery compared with open surgery decreases surgical site infection in obese patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2012;256:934–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fischer M, Dias C, Stein A, et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis in obese patients submitted to bariatric surgery. A systematic review. Acta Cir Bra. 2014;9:209–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Burke A. Cunha.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

All authors declare no conflict of interest in publication of this manuscript.

Informed Consent

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, X., Brathwaite, C.E.M., Barkan, A. et al. Optimal Cefazolin Prophylactic Dosing for Bariatric Surgery: No Need for Higher Doses or Intraoperative Redosing. OBES SURG 27, 626–629 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2331-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2331-9

Keywords

Navigation