Abstract
Background
The pressure pulse contour method for measuring stroke volume (SV) and cardiac output (CO) has come of age. Various methods have been proposed, but at this time no single technique has shown clear superiority over the others. This commentary and review discusses the various methods, and particularly the pressure recording analytical method (PRAM). Dissection of the method shows that vascular wall abnormalities, which are not unique to the morbidly obese state, represent one more biophysical perturbation causing inaccuracy in stroke volume and cardiac output determination. As PRAM is an uncalibrated method, its accuracy depends on certain assumptions that may not fully explain the multitude of combinations and permutations that define pulsatile blood flow; specifically, the area under the pressure curve during systole and the morphologic characteristics of the waveform throughout the cardiac cycle. As a result of incomplete theory, referenced specifically to the morbidly obese individual, PRAM does not faithfully mimic established reference standards of flow; it systematically underestimates stroke volume and cardiac output. Field equations, that is, equations that are applicable over the full gamut of hemodynamic conditions and vascular pathology, are analytically derived truisms. They require input variables that satisfy the natural state of affairs. To realize this state of absolute biophysical bliss, these variables should ideally be measured. Unfortunately, because of the constraints of practicality, shortcuts to the absolute truth are obligatorily required. As a result, pressure pulse contour methods have evolved that employ curve analysis and neural networking techniques, providing uncalibrated facsimiles of SV and CO.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Balderi T, Forfori F, Marra V, et al. Continuous hemodynamic monitoring during laparoscopic gastric bypass in superobese patients by pressure recording analytical method. Obes Surg. 2008; doi:10.1007/s11695-007-9379-5.
Dumont L, Mattys M, Mardirosoff C, et al. Hemodynamic changes during laparoscopic gastroplasty in morbidly obese patients. Obes Surg. 1997;7:326–31.
Nguyen NT, Ho HS, Fleming NW, et al. Cardiac function during laparoscopic vs open gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:78–83.
Artuso D, Wayne M, Cassaro S, et al. Hemodynamic changes during laparoscopic gastric bypass procedures. Arch Surg. 2005;140:289–92.
Lavie CJ, Messerli FH. Cardiovascular adaptation to obesity and hypertension. Chest. 1986;90:275–79.
Stelfox HT, Ahmed SB, Ribeiro RA, et al. Hemodynamic monitoring in obese patients: the impact of body mass index on cardiac output and stroke volume. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:1243–46.
Romano SM, Pistolesi M. Assessment of cardiac output from systemic arterial pressure in humans. Crit Care Med. 2002;30:1834–41.
Giomarelli P, Biagioli B, Scolletta S. Cardiac output monitoring by pressure recording analytical method in cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004;26:515–20.
Scolletta S, Romano SM, Biagioli B, et al. Pressure recording analytical method (PRAM) for measurement of cardiac output during various haemodynamic states. Br J Anaesth. 2005;95:159–65.
Greenwald SE. Pulse pressure and arterial elasticity. Q J Med. 2002;95:107–12.
Belz GG. Elastic properties and Windkessel function of the human aorta. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1995;9:73–83.
Cerutti C, Gustin MP, Molino P, et al. Beat to beat stroke volume estimation from aortic pressure waveform in conscious rats: comparison of models. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2001;281: H1148–55.
Langewouters GJ, Wesseling KH, Goedhard WJA. The static elastic properties of 45 Human thoracic and 20 abdominal aortas in vitro and the parameters of a new model. J Biomech. 1984;17:425–35
Wesseling KH, Jansen JRC, Settels JJ, et al. Computation of aortic flow from pressure in humans using a nonlinear, three-element model. J Appl Physiol. 1993;74:2566–73.
Jansen JRC, Schreuder JJ, Mulier JP, et al. A comparison of cardiac output derived from the arterial pressure wave against thermodilution in cardiac surgery patients. Br J Anaesth. 2001;87:212–22.
Godje O, Hoke K, Goetz AE, et al. Reliability of a new algorithm for continuous cardiac output determination by pulse-contour analysis during hemodynamic instability. Crit Care Med. 2002;30:52–8.
Button D, Weibel L, Reuthebuch O, et al. Clinical evaluation of the FloTrac/Vigileo™ system and two established continuous cardiac output monitoring devices in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2007;99:329–36.
Manecke GR, Auger WR. Cardiac output determination from the arterial wave: clinical testing of a novel algorithm that does not require calibration. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2007;21:3–7.
Mayer J, Boldt J, Schollhorn T, et al. Semi-invasive monitoring of cardiac output by a new device using arterial pressure waveform analysis: a comparison with intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2007;98:178–82.
Prasser C, Trabold B, Schwab A, et al. Evaluation of an improved algorithm for arterial pressure-based cardiac output assessment without external calibration. Intensive Care Med. 2007;2223–25.
Ikonomidis I, Mazarakis A, Papdopoulos C, et al. Weight loss after bariatric surgery improves aortic elastic properties and left ventricular function in individuals with morbid obesity: a 3-year follow-up study. J Hypertens. 2007;25:439–47.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-008-9566-z
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bernstein, D.P. Pressure Pulse Contour-derived Stroke Volume and Cardiac Output in the Morbidly Obese Patient. OBES SURG 18, 1015–1021 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-007-9378-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-007-9378-6