Skip to main content
Log in

Treatment of high fracture risk patients in routine clinical practice

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Osteoporosis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Summary

A retrospective cohort study determined the high incidence of recurrent fractures in osteoporotic patients with high fracture risk during the observation. The strategy of starting treatment with more potent regimens (zoledronic acid, denosumab and/or teriparatide) seems to have the best secondary fracture prevention efficacy.

Objective

This paper describes the various medical therapy regimens prescribed to osteoporotic patients with high fracture risk and the result of treatment.

Methods

We carried out a retrospective cohort study in selected Osteoporosis Centers. Patients were considered to have high fracture risk in case of a history of a low-energy hip fracture or two or more vertebral or other site fractures. A total of 812 subjects (768 women and 44 men) aged 36–95 years were included. The observation period was 2285.1 patient-years. Demographic data, clinical findings, and BMD data obtained by DXA, as well as a history of fractures that had occurred during the follow-up, were included in the analysis.

Results

Overall, at baseline, there were 637 non-vertebral fractures including 104 hip fractures. A total of 590 patients had vertebral fractures; of these, 69% suffered multiple fractures. Being on treatment, 119 (14.7%) patients developed new vertebral and non-vertebral fractures. The incidence of new non-vertebral fractures and hip fractures was 39.4 and 13.1 per 1000 patient-years. The total number of vertebral fractures increased by 24.8% from 1353 to 1689. The best results of the treatment were achieved in patients who were started on zoledronic acid, denosumab, or teriparatide and had an adequate duration of treatment. Although these patients had significantly lower BMD values at the time of diagnosis compared with other patients, they showed a lower incidence of new vertebral and hip fractures, during the follow-up.

Conclusion

Therapy of patients at high risk of fractures started with more potent treatment regimens (zoledronic acid, denosumab and/or teriparatide) of adequate duration was more effective in terms of prevention of new vertebral and hip fractures as compared with other treatment options. However, treatment appears to be challenging given the number of recurrent fractures in patients on treatment and the frequency of drug withdrawal or replacement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. (1994) Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Report of a WHO Study Group. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 843:1–129

  2. Svedbom A, Borgstöm F, Hernlund E, Ström O, Alekna V, Bianchi ML, Clark P, Curiel MD, Dimai HP, Jürisson M, Kallikorm R, Lember M, Lesnyak O, McCloskey E, Sanders KM, Silverman S, Solodovnikov A, Tamulaitiene M, Thomas T, Toroptsova N, Uusküla A, Tosteson ANA, Jönsson B, Kanis JA (2018) Quality of life for up to 18 months after low-energy hip, vertebral, and distal forearm fractures-results from the ICUROS. Osteoporos Int 29(3):557–566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-017-4317-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Harvey N, Dennison E, Cooper C (2010) Osteoporosis: impact on health and economics [published correction appears in Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2010 Apr;6(4):184]. Nat Rev Rheumatol 6(2):99–105. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrrheum.2009.260

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kanis JA, Cooper C, Rizzoli R, Reginster J-Y, on behalf of the Scientific Advisory Board of the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis (ESCEO) and the Committees of Scientific Advisors and National Societies of the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) (2019) European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 30:3–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-018-4704-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bliuc D, Nguyen ND, Milch VE, Nguyen TV, Eisman JA, Center JR (2009) Mortality risk associated with low-trauma osteoporotic fracture and subsequent fracture in men and women. JAMA. 301(5):513–521. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.50

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Schousboe JT, Fink HA, Taylor BC, Stone KL, Hillier TA, Nevitt MC, Ensrud KE (2005) Association between self-reported prior wrist fractures and risk of subsequent hip and radiographic vertebral fractures in older women: a prospective study. J Bone Miner Res 20(1):100–106. https://doi.org/10.1359/JBMR.041025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Morin SN, Lix LM, Leslie WD (2014) The importance of previous fracture site on osteoporosis diagnosis and incident fractures in women. J Bone Miner Res 29(7):1675–1680. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.2204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gehlbach S, Saag KG, Adachi JD et al (2012) Previous fractures at multiple sites increase the risk for subsequent fractures: the Global Longitudinal Study of Osteoporosis in Women. J Bone Miner Res 27:645–653. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.1476

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Blank RD, FRAX(®) Position Development Conference Members (2011) Official positions for FRAX® clinical regarding prior fractures from Joint Official Positions Development Conference of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry and International Osteoporosis Foundation on FRAX®. J Clin Densitom 14:205–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocd.2011.05.009

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Kanis JA, Adachi JD, Cooper C, Clark P, Cummings SR, Diaz-Curiel M, Harvey N, Hiligsmann M, Papaioannou A, Pierroz DD, Silverman SL, Szulc P, and the Epidemiology and Quality of Life Working Group of IOF (2013) Standardising the descriptive epidemiology of osteoporosis: recommendations from the Epidemiology and Quality of Life Working Group of IOF. Osteoporos Int 24:2763–2764. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-013-2413-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Diez-Perez A, Adachi JD, Agnusdei D, Bilezikian JP, Compston JE, Cummings SR, Eastell R, Eriksen EF, Gonzalez-Macias J, Liberman UA, Wahl DA, Seeman E, Kanis JA, Cooper C, IOF CSA Inadequate Responders Working Group (2012) Treatment failure in osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 23(12):2769–2774. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-012-2093-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Huntjens KMB, Kosar S, van Geel TACM, Geusens PP, Willems P, Kessels A, Winkens B, Brink P, van Helden S (2010) Risk of subsequent fracture and mortality within 5 years after a non-vertebral fracture. Osteoporos Int 21(12):2075–2082. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-010-1178-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Akesson K, Marsh D, Mitchell PJ et al (2013) Capture the fracture: a Best Practice Framework and global campaign to break the fragility fracture cycle. Osteoporos Int 24(8):2135–2152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-013-2348-z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Hopkins RB, Goeree R, Pullenayegum E, Adachi JD, Papaioannou A, Xie F, Thabane L (2011) The relative efficacy of nine osteoporosis medications for reducing the rate of fractures in post-menopausal women. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 12:209 Published 2011 Sep 26. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-12-209

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Kendler DL, Marin F, Zerbini CAF, Russo LA, Greenspan SL, Zikan V, Bagur A, Malouf-Sierra J, Lakatos P, Fahrleitner-Pammer A, Lespessailles E, Minisola S, Body JJ, Geusens P, Möricke R, López-Romero P (2018) Effects of teriparatide and risedronate on new fractures in post-menopausal women with severe osteoporosis (VERO): a multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy, randomised controlled trial [published correction appears in Lancet. 2017 Nov 30;:] [published correction appears in Lancet. 2018 Dec 1;392(10162):2352]. Lancet 391(10117):230–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32137-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Body JJ, Marin F, Kendler DL, Zerbini CAF, López-Romero P, Möricke R, Casado E, Fahrleitner-Pammer A, Stepan JJ, Lespessailles E, Minisola S, Geusens P (2020) Efficacy of teriparatide compared with risedronate on FRAX®-defined major osteoporotic fractures: results of the VERO clinical trial. Osteoporos Int 31(10):1935–1942. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-020-05463-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Brown JP, Prince RL, Deal C, Recker RR, Kiel DP, de Gregorio LH, Hadji P, Hofbauer LC, Álvaro-Gracia JM, Wang H, Austin M, Wagman RB, Newmark R, Libanati C, San Martin J, Bone HG (2009) Comparison of the effect of denosumab and alendronate on BMD and biochemical markers of bone turnover in postmenopausal women with low bone mass: a randomized, blinded, phase 3 trial. J Bone Miner Res 24(1):153–161. https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.0809010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Body JJ, Gaich GA, Scheele WH, Kulkarni PM, Miller PD, Peretz A, Dore RK, Correa-Rotter R, Papaioannou A, Cumming DC, Hodsman AB (2002) A randomized double-blind trial to compare the efficacy of teriparatide [recombinant human parathyroid hormone (1-34)] with alendronate in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87(10):4528–4535. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2002-020334

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tan W, Sun J, Zhou L, Li Y, Wu X (2016) Randomized trial comparing efficacies of zoledronate and alendronate for improving bone mineral density and inhibiting bone remodelling in women with post-menopausal osteoporosis. J Clin Pharm Ther 41(5):519–523. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpt.12429

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Reid DM, Devogelaer JP, Saag K, Roux C, Lau CS, Reginster JY, Papanastasiou P, Ferreira A, Hartl F, Fashola T, Mesenbrink P, Sambrook PN (2009) Zoledronic acid and risedronate in the prevention and treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (HORIZON): a multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 373(9671):1253–1263. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60250-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Davis S, Martyn-St James M, Sanderson J, Stevens J, Goka E, Rawdin A, Sadler S, Wong R, Campbell F, Stevenson M, Strong M, Selby P, Gittoes N (2016) A systematic review and economic evaluation of bisphosphonates for the prevention of fragility fractures [published correction appears in Health Technol Assess. 2018 Mar;20(78):407-424]. Health Technol Assess 20(78):1–406. https://doi.org/10.3310/hta20780

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhou J, Ma X, Wang T, Zhai S (2016) Comparative efficacy of bisphosphonates in short-term fracture prevention for primary osteoporosis: a systematic review with network meta-analyses. Osteoporos Int 27(11):3289–3300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-016-3654-z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang G, Sui L, Gai P, Li G, Qi X, Jiang X (2017) The efficacy and safety of vertebral fracture prevention therapies in post-menopausal osteoporosis treatment: which therapies work best? A network meta-analysis. Bone Joint Res 6(7):452–463. https://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.67.BJR-2016-0292.R1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The study was conducted with the financial support from Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA. This included technical support in communication, coordination of the study centers, and translation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olga Lesnyak.

Ethics declarations

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or compatible ethical standards.

Conflicts of interest

Olga Lesnyak, Elena Gladkova, Zhanna Belaya, Ksenia Belova, Natalya Bezlyudnaya, Olga Dobrovolskaya, Alexandr Dreval, Olga Ershova, Tatiana Grebennikova, Irina Kryukova, Sergey Mazurenko,, Ludmila Rozhinskaya, Rusanna Samigullina, Alexander Solodovnikov, and Natalya Toroptsova declare that they have no conflict of interest. Nikolay Aleksandrov and Diana Priymak are employees of Eli Lilly and Company and own stocks.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lesnyak, O., Gladkova, E., Aleksandrov, N. et al. Treatment of high fracture risk patients in routine clinical practice. Arch Osteoporos 15, 184 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-020-00851-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-020-00851-z

Keywords

Navigation