Abstract
Background
Morbidity and Mortality Conferences (M&MCs) have for generations been part of the education of physicians, yet their effectiveness remains questionable. The Ottawa M&M Model (OM3) was developed to provide a structured approach to M&MCs in order to maximize the quality improvement impact of such rounds.
Study design
We conducted a retrospective assessment of the impact of implementing nephrology-specific M&MCs using the OM3.
Setting and participants
All physicians, residents and fellows from the division of nephrology at a large academic medical center were invited to participate.
Quality improvement plan
Structured M&MCs were implemented to identify preventable errors and generate actions to improve quality of care and patient safety.
Outcomes
Number and nature of cases reviewed, number and nature of recommendations generated through identification of preventable health system and/or cognitive factors.
Measurements
Morbidity and/or mortality in each case were identified. A determination of the underlying factors and preventability of these events was made. A qualitative review of resulting recommendations was performed.
Results
Over the course of sixteen 1-h long conferences, 52 cases were presented. For all cases presented, discussion, action items and information dissemination followed the OM3. As a result of the M&MCs, 29 recommendations (emanating from 27 cases) lead to improve care delivery.
Limitations
Limitations of this study include its retrospective nature and single-center design.
Conclusions
The implementation of regularly scheduled M&MCs at an academic nephrology program, using a structured model, identified preventable health-systems issues and cognitive errors. Approximately one-half of the cases reviewed generated actions for health care delivery improvement.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Deis JN, Smith KM, Warren MD et al (2008) Transforming the morbidity and mortality conference into an instrument for systemwide improvement. In: Henriksen K, Battles JB, Keyes MA et al (eds) Advances in patient safety: New directions and alternative approaches. Culture and redesign, vol 2. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK43710/
Flexner A (2002) Medical education in the United States and Canada. From the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, Bulletin Number Four, 1910. Bull World Health Organ 80:594–602
Orlander JD, Barber TW, Fincke BG (2002) The morbidity and mortality conference: the delicate nature of learning from error. Acad Med 77:1001–1006
ACGME Program Requirements for Graduate Medical Education in Surgery. Chicago, IL: Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education; 2016. [Accessed 7 Dec 2016]. http://www.acgme.org/Portals/0/PFAssets/ProgramRequirements/440_general_surgery_2016.pdf
Orlander JD, Fincke BG (2003) Morbidity and mortality conference: a survey of academic internal medicine departments. J Gen Intern Med 18:656–658
Croskerry P, Sinclair D (2001) Emergency medicine: a practice prone to error? CJEM 3:271–276
Ely JW, Graber ML, Croskerry P (2011) Checklists to reduce diagnostic errors. Acad Med 86:307–313
Reason J (1995) Understanding adverse events: human factors. Qual Health Care 4:80–89
Reason J (2000) Human error: models and management. BMJ 320:768–770
Carthey J (2013) Understanding safety in healthcare: the system evolution, erosion and enhancement model. J Public Health Res 2:e25
Bal G, Sellier E, Tchouda SD et al (2014) Improving quality of care and patient safety through morbidity and mortality conferences. J Healthc Qual 36:29–36
Higginson J, Walters R, Fulop N (2012) Mortality and morbidity meetings: an untapped resource for improving the governance of patient safety? BMJ Qual Saf 21:576–585
Calder LA, Kwok ES, Adam Cwinn A et al (2014) Enhancing the quality of morbidity and mortality rounds: the Ottawa M&M model. Acad Emerg Med 21:314–321
Kwok ESH, Calder LA, Barlow-Krelina E, Mackie C, Seely AJE, Cwinn AA, Worthington JR, Frank JR (2017) Implementation of a structured hospital-wide morbidity and mortality rounds model. BMJ Qual Saf 26(6):439–448
Quality Improvement and Patient Safety Leadership Program. Telfer School of Management, University of Ottawa. [Accessed 11 Jan 2017]. http://www.telfer.uottawa.ca/executiveprograms/en/our-programs/11/the-improving-quality-and-patient-safety-leadership-program
Quality of Care Information Protection Act. Toronto, ON: Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care; 2014. [Accessed 12 Dec 2016]. http://www.health.gov.on.ca/en/common/legislation/qcipa/
Pierluissi E, Fischer MA, Campbell AR et al (2003) Discussion of medical errors in morbidity and mortality conferences. JAMA 290:2838–2842
Katz D, Detsky AS (2016) Incorporating metacognition into morbidity and mortality rounds: the next frontier in quality improvement. J Hosp Med 11:120–122
Eva KW, Hatala RM, Leblanc VR et al (2007) Teaching from the clinical reasoning literature: combined reasoning strategies help novice diagnosticians overcome misleading information. Med Educ 41:1152–1158
Graber ML, Kissam S, Payne VL et al (2012) Cognitive interventions to reduce diagnostic error: a narrative review. BMJ Qual Saf 21:535–557
Norman GR, Eva KW (2010) Diagnostic error and clinical reasoning. Med Educ 44:94–100
Epstein NE (2012) Morbidity and mortality conferences: their educational role and why we should be there. Surg Neurol Int 3:S377–S388
Thomas MK, McDonald RJ, Foley EF et al (2012) Educational value of morbidity and mortality (M&M) conferences: are minor complications important? J Surg Educ 69:326–329
Boysen PG 2nd (2013) Just culture: a foundation for balanced accountability and patient safety. Ochsner J 13:400–406
Stewart DA, Junn J, Adams MA et al (2016) House staff participation in patient safety reporting: identification of predominant barriers and implementation of a pilot program. South Med J 109:395–400
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank all the physicians, residents and trainees of the nephrology program at the Ottawa Hospital who contributed to the success of the M&MCs.
Author contributions
Research idea and study design: PAB, SH, AA; data acquisition: PAB, AA, SH; data analysis/interpretation: PAB, SH, CM, AA, EC; supervision and mentorship: ESHK, EC. Each author contributed important intellectual content during manuscript drafting or revision and accepts accountability for the overall work by ensuring that questions pertaining to the accuracy or integrity of any portion of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
Funding
This study was not supported by external funding. SH, AA and EC receive research salary support from the Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict interest
The authors report no conflict interests.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brown, P.A., Hiremath, S., Clark, E.G. et al. Implementation and evaluation of structured nephrology morbidity and mortality conferences: a quality education report. Int Urol Nephrol 50, 929–938 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-018-1842-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-018-1842-9