Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Choice of breeding stock, preference of production traits and culling criteria of village chickens among Zimbabwe agro-ecological zones

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Tropical Animal Health and Production Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Free ranging chickens reared by smallholder farmers represent genetic diversity suited for particular environments and shaped by the socio-economic and cultural values of the farming systems. This study sought to investigate the existence of chicken strains and evaluate the breeding goals and strategies used by village chicken farmers in Zimbabwe. A semi-structured questionnaire was administered to 97, 56, 70, 104 and 37 households randomly selected from five agro-ecological-zones I-V, respectively. Fifteen chicken strains mostly defined by morphological traits were reported in the five eco-zones. Production criteria such as body size, and fertility were highly ranked (ranging from 1.3 – 2.6) by farmers across all the eco-zones, while cultural traits were the least preferred production traits. As a common breeding practice, farmers chose the type of hens and cocks to retain for breeding purposes and these randomly mixed and mated with others from community flocks. Chicken body size was ranked the major determinant in choosing breeding animals followed by mothering ability, and fertility. More households culled chickens associated with poor reproductive performance, poor growth rates and those intolerant to disease pathogens. The focus on many negatively correlated production traits and the absence of farmer records compromises breeding strategies in these production systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, S., 2003. Animal genetic resources and sustainable livelihoods. Ecological Economics, 45, 315–517. doi:10.1016/S0921–8009(03)00088–0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badubi, S. S., Rakereng, M. and Marumo, M., 2006. Morphological characteristics and feed resources available for indigenous chickens in Botswana. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 18, http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd18/1/badu18003.htm.

  • Bebe, B. O., Udo, H. M. J., Rowlands, G. J. and Thorpe, W., 2003. Smallholder dairy systems in the Kenya highlands: breed preferences and breeding practices. Livestock Production Science, 82, 117–127. doi:10.1016/S0301–6226(03)00029–0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, R. D., 1990. Poultry genetic resources: Evolution, diversity and conservation. In: R. D. Crawford, (ed), Poultry Breeding and Genetics. Elsevier Science Publishers. Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 43–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C.F., Bordas, A., Gourichon, D. and Tixier-Boichard, M., 2004. Effect of high ambient temperature and naked neck genotype on performance of dwarf brown-egg layers selected for improved clutch length. British Poultry Science, 45, 346–354 doi:10.1080/00071660410001730842

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Curry, J., 1996. Gender and livestock in African production systems: an Introduction. Human. Ecology, 24, 149–160. doi:10.1007/BF02169124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delany, M. E., 2003. Genetic diversity and conservation of poultry. In: W. M. Muir, S. E. Aggrey, (eds), Poultry Genetics, Breeding and Biotechnology. CABI publishing, CAB International, Trowbridge, United Kingdom, pp. 257–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO/IAEA., 2002. Characteristics and Parameters of Family Poultry Production in Africa. IAEA Vienna.

  • Francis, J. and Sibanda, S., 2001. Participatory action research experiences in smallholder dairy farming in Zimbabwe. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 13, http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd13/3/fran133.htm.

  • Gondwe, T. N., 2004. Characterisation of local chicken in low input-lowoutput production systems: Is there scope for appropriate production and breeding strategies in Malawi? PhD thesis: Institute of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Section: Animal Husbandry and Breeding in the Tropics and Sub-tropics, Georg-August-Universität, Germany. Cullivier Verlag Göttingen.

  • Gondwe, T. N. P., Wollny, C. B. A., Chagunda, M. G. G., Safalaoh, A. C. H. and Chilera, F. C., 2000. Community based promotion of rural poultry diversity and utilisation in Malawi. www.unu.edu/env/plec/cbd/Gondwe.doc.

  • Gueye, F. H. E., 2002. Employment and income generation through family poultry in low income food-deficit countries. World Poultry Science Journal, 58, 541–555. doi:10.1079/WPS20020039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henson, E. L., 1992. In situ conservation of livestock and poultry. FAO Animal Production and Health Paper 99. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. Rome, Italy.

  • Jabbar, M. and Diedhiou, M., 2003. Does breed matter to cattle farmers and buyers? Evidence from West Africa. Ecological Economics, 45, 461–472. doi:10.1016/S0921–8009(03)00097–1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitalyi, A. J., 1998. Village chicken production systems in rural Africa: Household food security and gender issues. FAO Animal Production and Health Paper 142. Rome, Italy.

  • Kusina, J., Kusina, N.T. and Mhlanga, J., 2001. A survey on village chicken losses: causes and solution as perceived by farmers. In: R. G. Alders, P. B. Spradbrow, (eds), Proceedings 103 of SADC/ACIAR planning workshop on New castle disease control in village chickens, Canberra, Australia, pp. 49–56.

  • Marle-Köster, E. and Nel, L. H., 2000. Genetic characterisation of native southern African chicken populations: evaluation and selection of polymorphic microsatellite markers. South African Journal of Animal Science, 30, http://www.sasas.co.za/Sajas.html.

  • Maphosa, T., Kusina, J., Kusina, N T., Makuza, S. and Sibanda, S., 2004: A monitoring study comparing production of village chickens between communal (Nharira) and small-scale commercial (Lancashire) farming areas in Zimbabwe. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 16, http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd16/7/maph16048.htm.

  • McAnish, C.V., Kusina, J., Madsen, J. and Nyoni, O., 2004. Traditional chicken production in Zimbabwe. World Poultry Science Journal, 60, 233–246. doi:10.1079/WPS20040018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mhlanga, F. N., Khombe, C. T. and Makuza, S. M., 1999. Evaluation of indigenous livestock genotypes of Zimbabwe. A report prepared for the Department of Animal Science, University of Zimbabwe, pp. 102–114.

  • Missohou, A., Dieng, A., Horst, P., Zarate, V. A., Nesseim, T. and Tchedre, K., 2003. Effect of Dwarf (dw) and frizzle (F) genes on the performance of layers under Senegalese conditions. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 35, 373–380 Medline. doi:10.1023/A:1025149523151

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Muchadeyi, F.C., Sibanda. S., Kusina. N. T., Kusina. J. and Makuza S. M., 2004. The village chicken production system in Rushinga District of Zimbabwe. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 16, http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd16/6/much16040.html.

  • Muchadeyi, F.C., Sibanda, S., Kusina, N. T., Kusina, J. and Makuza, S. M., 2005. Village chicken Flock dynamics and the contribution of chickens to household livelihoods in a smallholder farming area in Zimbabwe. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 37, 333–344. doi:10.1007/s11250–005–5082–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Msoffe, P. L. M., Minga, U. M., Olsen, J. E., Yongolo, M. G. S., Juul-Madsen, H. R., Gwakisa, P. S. and Mtambo, M. M. A., 2001a. Phenotypes including immune competence in scavenging local chicken ecotypes in Tanzania. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 33, 341–354 doi:10.1023/A:1010544221028

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Msoffe, P.L.M., Mtambo, M. M. A., Minga, U. M., Yongolo, M. G. S., Gwakisa, P. S., and Olsen, J. E., 2001b. Identification and characterization of free ranging local chicken eco-types in Tanzania. In: G. C. Kifaro, R. L. Kurwijila, S. W. Chenyambuga, and R. R. Chilewa (eds), Proceedings of SUA-MU ENRECA project on farm animal genetic resources in Tanzania. Tanesco training Institute, Morogoro, Tanzania, pp. 81–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattersen, D. L., 2003. Farm animal genetic resources conservation. Why and How? Canadian Farm Animal Genetic Resources Foundation. http://www.cfagrf.com.

  • Reithmuller, P., 2003. The social impact of livestock: A developing country perspective. Animal Science Journal, 74, 245–253. doi:10.1046/j.1344–3941.2003.00113.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, B. D., 1996. Livestock production, age and gender among the Keiyo of Kenya. Human Ecology, 24, 215–230. doi:10.1007/BF02169127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statistical Analysis System (SAS)., 2000. SAS/STAT User’s Guide, Release 8.1 Edition, SAS Institute Inc, Cary, North Carolina. USA.

  • Steglich, M. and Peters, K. J., 2004. Conservation and Sustainable use of Agricultural Biodiversity: A source book. CIPUPWARD. GTZ. Bonn Germany.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Many thanks go to the farmers in the five agro-ecological zones of Zimbabwe for their cooperation during the period of study. The Agricultural Research and Extension personnel in Zimbabwe facilitated contact with village chicken farmers. F.C. Muchadeyi had a fellowship from the Katholischer Akademischer Ausländer-Dienst (KAAD).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. C. Muchadeyi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Muchadeyi, F.C., Wollny, C.B.A., Eding, H. et al. Choice of breeding stock, preference of production traits and culling criteria of village chickens among Zimbabwe agro-ecological zones. Trop Anim Health Prod 41, 403–412 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-008-9204-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-008-9204-8

Keywords

Navigation