Abstract
Various estimation methods and the lack of a systematic derivation of the core objective function implemented in NONMEM for nonlinear mixed effect modeling has caused consistent confusion and inquiry among scientists who routinely use NONMEM for data analysis. This paper provides a detailed derivation of the objective functions for the most commonly used estimation methods in NONMEM, such as the Laplacian method, the first-order conditional estimation method (FOCE) with or without interaction, and the first-order method (FO). In addition, models with homogenous or heterogeneous residual error were used to demonstrate the relationship between the objective functions derived from two different types of approximation, namely Laplacian approximation of log-likelihood and linearized model approximation. The relationship between these estimation methods and those implemented in SAS and Splus is discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Sheiner LB, Rosenberg B, Melmon KL (1972) Modelling of individual pharmacokinetics for computer aided drug dosage. Comput Biomed Res 5:441–459
Beal SL, Sheiner LB (1980) The NONMEM system. Am Statistician 34:118
Beal SL, Sheiner LB (1998) NONMEM users guide
Mentré F (2005) History and new developments in estimation methods for nonlinear mixed-effects model, Population Approach Group in Europe (PAGE) 2005 meeting.
Wolfinger RD (1993) Laplace’s approximation for nonlinear mixed models. Biometrika 80:791–795
Davidian M, Giltinan DM (1995) Nonlinear models for repeated measurement data. Chapman & Hall, First Edition
Vonesh EF, Chinchilli VM (1997) Linear and nonlinear models for the analysis of repeated measures. Marcel Dekker, New York
Pinheiro JC, Bates DM (2000) Mixed effects models in S and S-plus. Springer Verlag
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10928-008-9083-7.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, Y. Derivation of various NONMEM estimation methods. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn 34, 575–593 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10928-007-9060-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10928-007-9060-6