Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Novel Enhanced Gray Scale Adaptive Method for Prediction of Breast Cancer

  • Education & Training
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Breast cancer is the important problem across the globe in which, most of the women are suffering without knowing the causes and effects of the cancer cells. Mammographic is the most powerful tool for the diagnosis of the Breast cancer. The analysis of this mammogram images proves to be more vital in terms of diagnosis but the accuracy level still needs improvisation. Several intelligent techniques are suggested for the detection of Microcalcification, Clusters, Masses, Spiculate lesions, Asymmetry and Architectural distortions in the mammograms. But the prediction of the cancer levels needs more research light. For the determination of the higher level of accuracy and prediction, the proposed algorithm called Enhanced Gray Scale Adaptive Method (EGAM) which works on the principle of combination of K-GLCM and Extreme Fuzzy Learning Machines (EFLM). The proposed algorithm has achieved 99% accuracy and less computation time in terms of classification, detection and prediction when compared with the existing intelligent algorithms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cheng, H. D., Shi, X. J., Min, R., Hu, L. M., Cai, X. P., and Du, H. N., Approaches for automated detection and classification of masses in mammograms. Pattern Recogn. 39:646–668, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. AlQoud, A., and Jaffar, M., A., Hybrid Gabor based Local Binary Patterns Texture Features for classification of Breast Mammograms. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security. 16:2, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tulio, C. S. S. A., and Rangayyan, R. M., Classification of breast masses in mammograms using neural networks with shape, edge sharpness, and texture features. J Electron Imaging 15(1):013019, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang, P., Kumar, K., and Verma, B., A Hybrid Classifier for Mass Classification with Different Kinds of Features in Mammography. FSKD. LNAI 3614:316–319, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Swiniarski, R., Lim, HK., Independent Component Analysis, Principal Component Analysis and Rough Sets in Hybrid Mammogram Classification. International (SPIE) Symposium Medical Imaging, 2003.

  6. Ren, J., and DongWang, J. J., Effective recognition of MCCs in mammograms using an improved neural classifier. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 24:638–645, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jaffar, A., Hybrid texture based classification of breast mammograms using adaboost classifier. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications. 8(5), 2017.

  8. Singh, AS., Pawar, M.M., Mass classification of mammogram images using selected textural features with PNN classifier. International Journal of Innovative Research in Computer and Communication Engineering. 5(4), 2017.

  9. Abu-Amara, F., and Abdel-Qader, I., Hybrid mammogram classification using rough set and fuzzy classifier. International Journal of Biomedical Imaging. 2009, 2009.

  10. Murali, S., and Sathees Kumar, P., Multiclass classification of mammogram images with GLCM features. International Journal of Engineering Research Science and Technology, 4(1), 2015.

  11. Surendiran, B., and Vadivel, A., A hybrid classifier for mammogram mass classification using various new geometric shape and margin features. Int. J. Rapid Manuf. 2(1/2):56–75, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nithya, R., and Santhi, B., Mammogram classification using maximum difference feature selection method. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology. 33(2):197–204, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Suganthi, M., and Madheswaran, M., An improved medical decision support system to identify the breast cancer using mammogram. J. Med. Syst. 36(1):79–91, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yoshida, H., Doi, K., Nishikawa, R., Giger, M., and Schmidt, R., An improved computer-assisted diagnostic scheme using wavelet transform for detecting clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms. Acad. Radiol. 3:621–627, 1996.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bettahar, S., and Stambouli, A. B., Shock filter coupled to curvature diffusion for image denoising and sharpening. J. Image Vision Comput. 26:1481–1489, 2008 Elsevier.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Suganthi, M., and Madheswaran. Mammogram image enhancement and denoising using shock filters. Proceedings of International Conference on Advanced Communication and Informatics, TPGIT, Vellor, 2009.

  17. Tripathi, N., and Panda, S. P., A review on textural features based computer aided diagnostic system for mammogram mass classification using GLCM & RBFNN. International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT). 17(9):462–464, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Economopoulos, T. L., Asvestas, P. A., and Matsopoulos, G. K., Contrast enhancement of images using Partitioned Iterated Function Systems. Image Vis. Comput. 28(1):1–212, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tomar, R., and Kashyap, I., Efficient technique for texture features based CAD system for mammogram images using GLCM and RBFNN. Advances in Computer Science and Information Technology (ACSIT). 2(7):68–71, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lincy Golda Careline, S., and Leena Jasmine, J. S., Microcalcification and Macrocalcification Detection in Mammograms Based on GLCM and ODCM Texture Features Using SVM Classifier. International Journal of Advanced Engineering Research and Science. 4(6):010–016, 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kumar Singh, A., and Gupta, B., A Novel Approach for Breast Cancer Detection and Segmentation in a Mammogram Elsevier page No 676–682, 2015.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Selvi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

C. Selvi has no conflict of interest with Co-Author M.Suganthi. No conflict of Interest between Two Authors.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

As this article does not involved Human participants so, no such informed consent.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Education & Training

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Selvi, C., Suganthi, M. A Novel Enhanced Gray Scale Adaptive Method for Prediction of Breast Cancer. J Med Syst 42, 221 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-018-1082-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-018-1082-7

Keywords

Navigation