Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Challenges in the Provision of Sexual and Reproductive Health Care to Refugee and Migrant Women: A Q Methodological Study of Health Professional Perspectives

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This Q methodological study was conducted to examine the perspectives of health professionals in providing sexual and reproductive health (SRH) care to refugee and migrant women. Forty-seven health professionals rank-ordered 42 statements and commented on their rankings in subsequent open-ended questions. A bi-person factor analysis was performed and factors were extracted according to the centroid method with a varimax rotation. Seven factors each with a distinct and meaningful viewpoint were identified. These factors are: “Communication difficulties—hurdles to counselling”, “Lack of access to culturally appropriate care”, “Navigating SRH care”, “Cultural constraints on effective communication”, “Effects of the lack of cultural competency”, “Impacts of low income and language barrier” and “SRH services are accessible, but not culturally relevant”. A more culturally adaptive healthcare model that considers refugee and migrant women’s linguistic, cultural and socio-economic backgrounds; and engages health professionals on an ongoing process of building cultural competency is central to improve SRH access to these women.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Department of Immigration and Boarder Protection. A History of the Department of Immigration and Boarder Protection-Managing Migration to Australia. https://www.border.gov.au/CorporateInformation/Documents/immigration-history.pdf: Department of Immigration and Boarder Protection, Australian Government 2015.

  2. Department of Social Service. Settlement reports: gender by migration Stream. Canberra 2015.

  3. Aminisani N, Armstrong BK, Canfell K. Cervical cancer screening in Middle Eastern and Asian migrants to Australia: a record linkage study. Cancer Epidemiol. 2012;36(6):e394–e400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. MCWH. Putting immigrant and refugee women’s health first-sexual & reproductive health data report. Melbourne 2010.

  5. Ngum Chi Watts MC, Liamputtong P, Carolan M. Contraception knowledge and attitudes: truths and myths among African Australian teenage mothers in Greater Melbourne, Australia. J Clin Nurs. 2014;23(15–16):2131–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mazza D, Harrison C, Taft A, Brijnath B, Britt H, Hobbs M, et al. Current contraceptive management in Australian general practice: an analysis of BEACH data. Med J Aust. 2012;197(2):110–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mengesha Z, Dune T, Perz J. Culturally and linguistically diverse women’s views and experiences of accessing sexual and reproductive health care in Australia: a systematic review. Sexual Health. 2016.

  8. Sheikh-Mohammed M, Macintyre CR, Wood NJ, Leask J, Isaacs D. Barriers to access to health care for newly resettled sub-Saharan refugees in Australia. Med J Aust. 2006;185(11–12):594–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ussher J, Rhyder-Obid M, Perz J, Rae M, Wong TK, Newman P. Purity, Privacy and procreation: constructions and experiences of sexual and reproductive health in Assyrian and Karen women living in Australia. Sex Cult. 2012;16(4):467–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Murray SB, Skull SA. Hurdles to health: immigrant and refugee health care in Australia. Aust Health Rev. 2005;29(1):25–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Garrett PW, Dickson HG, Whelan AK, Whyte L. Representations and coverage of non-English-speaking immigrants and multicultural issues in three major Australian health care publications. Austr N Z Health Policy. 2010;7:1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Brown SR. Q Methodology and Qualitative Research. Qual Health Res. 1996;6(4):561–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cross RM. Exploring attitudes: the case for Q methodology. Health Educ Res. 2005;20(2):206–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Watts S, Stenner P. Doing Q methodological research: theory, method and interpretation. London: London Sage Publications; 2012. p. 256.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Watts S, Stenner P. Doing Q methodology: theory, method and interpretation. Quali Res Psychol. 2005;2(1):67–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Risdon A, Eccleston C, Crombez G, McCracken L. How can we learn to live with pain? A Q-methodological analysis of the diverse understandings of acceptance of chronic pain. Soc Sci Med. 2003;56(2):375–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Stenner PH, Bianchi G, Popper M, Supeková M, Lukšík I, Pujol J. Constructions of sexual relationships: a study of the views of young people in Catalunia, England and Slovakia and their health implications. J Health Psychol. 2006;11(5):669–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Brown SR. Political subjectivity, applications of Q methodology in political science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Brown SR. A primer on Q-methodology. Operant subjectivity 1993.

  20. Brown RD, Pirtle T. Beliefs of professional and family caregivers about the sexuality of individuals with intellectual disabilities: examining beliefs using a Q-methodology approach. Sex Educ. 2008;8(1):59–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Coogan J, Herrington N. Q methodology: an overview. Res Second Teacher Educ. 2011;1(2):24–8.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Stainton Rogers R. Q Methodology. In: Smith JA, Harre R, Van Langenhove L, editors. Rethinking methods in psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Reber B, Kaufman S. Q-assessor: developing and testing an online solution to Q method data gathering and processing. Amsterdam: World Association for Public Opinion Research; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Stenner PH, Cooper D, Skevington SM. Putting the Q into quality of life; the identification of subjective constructions of health-related quality of life using Q methodology. Soc Sci Med. 2003;57(11):2161–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Newbold KB, Willinsky J. Providing family planning and reproductive healthcare to Canadian immigrants: perceptions of healthcare providers. Cult Health Sex. 2009;11(4):369–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. McKeary M, Newbold B. Barriers to care: the challenges for Canadian refugees and their health care providers. J Refug Stud. 2010. doi:10.1093/jrs/feq038

    Google Scholar 

  27. Stenner P, Cross V, McCrum C, McGowan J, Defever E, Lloyd P, et al. Self-management of chronic low back pain: four viewpoints from patients and healthcare providers. Health Psychol Open. 2015;2(2):2055102915615337.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Degni F, Suominen S, Essen B, El Ansari W, Vehvilainen-Julkunen K. Communication and cultural issues in providing reproductive health care to immigrant women: health care providers’ experiences in meeting the needs of [corrected] Somali women living in Finland. J Immigr Minor Health. 2012;14(2):330–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Rogers C, Earnest J. A cross-generational study of contraception and reproductive health among Sudanese and Eritrean women in Brisbane, Australia. Health Care Women Int. 2014;35(3):334–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Riggs E, Davis E, Gibbs L, Block K, Szwarc J, Casey S, et al. Accessing maternal and child health services in Melbourne, Australia: Reflections from refugee families and service providers. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12(1):1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kreps GL, Kunimoto EN. Effective communication in multicultural health care settings. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1994.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  32. Henderson S, Kendall E. Culturally and linguistically diverse peoples’ knowledge of accessibility and utilisation of health services: exploring the need for improvement in health service delivery. Aust J Primary Health. 2011;17(2):195–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Gilliam ML, Hernandez M. Providing contraceptive care to low-income, African American teens: the experience of urban community health centers. J Community Health. 2007;32(4):231–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Betancourt JR, Green AR, Carrillo JE, Ananeh-Firempong O, 2nd. Defining cultural competence: a practical framework for addressing racial/ethnic disparities in health and health care. Public Health Reports (Washington, DC : 1974). 2003;118(4):293–302.

  35. Bischoff A, Perneger TV, Bovier PA, Loutan L, Stalder H. Improving communication between physicians and patients who speak a foreign language. Br J Gen Pract. 2003;53(492):541–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Erlen JA. Culture, ethics, and respect: the bottom line is understanding. Orthopedic nursing. 1998;17(6):79–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Thomas PE, Beckmann M, Gibbons K. The effect of cultural and linguistic diversity on pregnancy outcome. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010;50(5):419–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Hatch M. Common threads: the sexual and reproductive health experiences of immigrant and refugee women in Australia. Melbourne: MCWH; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Murray L, Windsor C, Parker E, Tewfik O. The experiences of African women giving birth in Brisbane, Australia. Health Care Women Int. 2010;31(5):458–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Butow PN, Sze M, Dugal-Beri P, Mikhail M, Eisenbruch M, Jefford M, et al. From inside the bubble: migrants’ perceptions of communication with the cancer team. Support Care Cancer. 2010;19(2):281–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Lloyd N, Rafferty A. Black and minority ethnic families and sure start: findings from Local Evaluation Reports London: NESS, 2006.

  42. Institute for Community Ethnicity and Policy Alternatives Victoria University. Review of Current Cultural and Linguistic Diversity and Cultural Competence Reporting Requirements, Minimum Standards and Benchmarks for Victoria Health Services Project Melbourne Victoria: Statewide Quality Branch, Victorian Government Department of Health, 2009.

  43. Owens C, Dandy J, Hancock P. Migrant and refugee women’s experiences of the shared care service (Antenatal care service). Mirrabooka, Perth: Ishar—Multicultural Women’s Health Centre; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Family Planning NSW and the Multicultural Centre for Women’s Health who assisted in the recruitment of participants, and the health professionals who provided their time and voices to this project.

Funding

This research has not received any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zelalem B. Mengesha.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

Ethical approval was received from the Human Research Ethics Committee of Western Sydney University with approval number H11034.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mengesha, Z.B., Perz, J., Dune, T. et al. Challenges in the Provision of Sexual and Reproductive Health Care to Refugee and Migrant Women: A Q Methodological Study of Health Professional Perspectives. J Immigrant Minority Health 20, 307–316 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-017-0611-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-017-0611-7

Keywords

Navigation