Abstract
An evoked potential differs from the EEG mainly in two ways:
-
1.
The EEG is a random, continuous signal, which arises from the ongoing activity of the outer layers of the cortex. An evoked potential is the brain’s response to a repetitive stimulus along a specific nerve pathway.
-
2.
EEG signals range from 10-200 milliVolt (mV). Evoked potentials are smaller in amplitude (1-5-20 μ Volt requiring precise electrode positioning and special techniques (signal averaging) to extract the specific response from the underlying EEG ‘noise’. The technique of signal averaging, as originally described by Dawson in 1954 [69J, has been further developed in computer processing. The technique is now used by applying a stimulus repeatedly – preferably at randomized intervals – and to record the evoked response over the corresponding area of the brain, averaging out mathematically the change over the number of stimuli.
Rationale for the use of EPs in the OR and the ICU
Evoked potentials (EPs) serve the following major purposes:
-
1.
Monitoring of the functional integrity of neural structures that may be at risk during, for instance, ECC (extracorporeal circulation) or endarterectomy indicating cerebral hypoxia.
-
2.
Monitoring of the effects of anesthetic agents and other centrally active drugs, which, besides the cortex, affect deeper neuronal structures.
-
3.
Orthopedic cases where the spinal cord is at risk such as Harrington rod insertion and removal.
-
4.
Clamping of the abdominal aortic artery during aneurysmectomy resulting in a potential damage of the lower parts of the spinal cord.
-
5.
Clipping of an intracerebral aneurysm, which may be impeding blood flow to vital cerebral textures.
-
6.
An indicator of cerebral hypoxia when the blood pressure is deliberately lowered.
-
7.
Operation on peripheral nerves and nerve roots to identify early trauma.
-
8.
Monitoring the cerebral function during controlled hypothermia when the EEG becomes flat.
-
9.
Monitoring of the pathophysiological conditions after severe head trauma and the effects of therapy.
-
10.
An intraoperative warning device of unsuspected awareness during light anesthesia when movement is abolished by muscle relaxants and cardiovascular responses are modified by vasoactive drugs.
In case of the latter the stimulus is a small electrical potential applied to the skin of the hand. Thereafter, the stimulus travels along the specific nervous pathways inducing (= generating) potential activation at various sites. The generation of potential changes at various sites along the pathway is an index for the integrity of the nerve. Thus, the evoked potential can be considered a neurophysiological response (usually of the cortex) to impulses originating from some externally stimulated sensory nerve. They provide a physiological measure of the functional integrity of the sensory nerve pathway, which can be used as a clinical diagnostic tool as well as for intraoperative monitoring. The evoked potential usually is recorded from the specific cortical area corresponding to the stimulus input.
The classification of evoked potentials
Stimulating a sensory nervous pathway induces evoked potentials. If the auditory nerve is stimulated by ‘clicks’ from headphones, it is called the auditory evoked potential (AEP). The early part of the AEP waveform (less than 10 msec) is called the Brainstem Auditory Evoked Potential (BAEP) since it reflects the passing of the impulse through the brainstem.
If a nerve on the arm or the leg is stimulated by a small electrical current applied to the overlying skin, it is called the Somatosensory Evoked Potential (SSEP). If, however, the retina is stimulated by means of flicker light or a sudden change in a checkerboard pattern, the evoked potential thus recorded over the corresponding cortical area is called the Visual Evoked Potential (VEP). Evoked potentials are used both as a diagnostic tool and as a monitoring technique. As diagnostic tests, evoked potentials are useful to evaluate neurologic disorders such as:
-
a)
multiple sclerosis
-
b)
acoustic nerve tumors, and
-
c).
optic neuritis
As a monitoring modality, evoked potentials are used during all surgical procedures, which might compromise part of the brain or the spinal cord.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allison T, McCarthy G, Wood CC. The relationship between human long-latency somatosensory evoked potentials recorded from the cortical surface and from the scalp. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1992; 84: 301–314.
Chiappa KH. Evoked Potentials in Clinical Medicine. New York, 1983.
Dawson GE. A summation technique for the detection of small evoked potentials. Electroencephalog Clin Neurophysiol 1954; 6: 65.
Burke B, Skuse NF, Lethlean HK. Cutanerous and muscle efferent components of the cerebral potential evoked by electrical stimulation of human peripheral nerves. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1981; 51: 579.
Stöhr M, Petruch F. Somatosensory evoked potential following stimulation of the trigeminal nerve in man. J neurol Neurosurg Psychiat 1970; 220: 95–98.
, Brunko E. Functional organization of far-field and cortical components in normal adults. In: Desmedt JE, ed. Clinical uses of Cerebral, Brainstem, and Spinal Somatosensory Evoked Potentials Basel: Karger, 1980: 27–50.
Chiappa KH, Choi SH, Young RR. Short-latency somatosensory evoked potentials following median nerve stimulation in patients with neurological lesions. In: Desmedt JE, ed. Clinical Uses of Cerebral, Brainstem, and Spinal Somatosensory Evoked Potentials Basel: Karger, 1980: pp 1–8.
Gracco RQ. Scalp evoked potentials evoked by median nerve stimulation; subcortical potentials, travelling waves, and somatosensory potential. In: Desmedt JE, ed. Clinical Use of Cervical, Brainstem and Spinal Somatosensory Evoked Potentials Basel: Karger, 1980: 1–14.
Grundy BL. Evoked potential monitoring. In: Blitt CD, ed. Monitoring in Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1985: 345–411.
Freye E, Buhl R, Schenk GK. Somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEP) are effected differently by mu-and kappa-selective opioids in the dog. Funct Neurol 1987; 2: 281–292.
Hassler R. Über die Zweiteilung der Schmerzempfindung und des Schmerzgefühl. In: R. J, Keidel WD, Herz A, Steichele C, eds. Schmerz Stuttgart: Thieme, 1972: 105.
Prior PF. Monitoring cerebral function Long-term Recordings of Cerebral Electrical Activity Amsterdam: North Holland Biomedical Press, 1979.
Stoeckel H, Schwilden H, Lauwen PM, Schüttler J. EEG indices for evaluation of depth of anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 1980; 53: 117.
Kochs E, Schulte am Esch J, Treede RD, Bromm B. Modulation of pain-related somatosensory evoked potentials in general anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1991; 71: 225–230.
Kochs E, Bischoff P. Anesthesia and somatosensory evoked potentials. In: Schulte am Esch J, Kochs E, eds. Central nervous system monitoring in anesthesia and intensive care. New Dehli: Macmillan; 1994, p. 146–175.
Kochs E, Treede RD, Schulte am Esch J, Bromm B. Modulation of pain-related somatosensory evoked potentials by general anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1990; 71: 225–2230.
Freye E, Hartung E, Schenk GK. Somatosensory-evoked potentials during block of surgical stimulation with propofol. Br J Anaesth 1989; 63: 357–359.
Benedetti G, Butler SA. Event related potentials correlates of analgesia. Comparison of fentanyl, acupuncture and nitrous oxide. Pain 1982; 14: 327.
Freye E, Buhl R, Ciaramelli F. Somatosensory-evoked potentials as predictors of the analgesic efficacy of nalbuphine, a mixed narcotic analgesic. Pain Clin 1987; 1: 225–331.
Chapmann CR, Jacobsen RC. Assessment of analgesic states: Can evoked potentials play a role? In: Bromm B, ed. Pain Measurement in Man. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1984, p. 233-356.
Chapmann CR, Chen ACN, Harkins SW. Brain evoked potentials as correlates of laboratory pain: A review and perspective. In: Bonica JJ, Liebeskind JC, Albe-Fessard DG, eds. Advances in Pain Research and Therapy. New York: Raven Press; 1979, p. 791–803.
Freye E, Neruda B, Falke K. EEG-Powerspektren und evozierte Potentiale unter Alfentanil/Midazolam-Analgosedierung bei Intensivpatienten. Anästhesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 1991; 26: 384–388.
Hume AL, Ducking MA. Central and spinal somatosensory conduction times during hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass and some observations on the effects of fentanyl and isoflurane anesthetics. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1980; 65: 46–58.
Desmedt JE, Cheon G. Centrral somatosensory conduction in man: Neural generatiors and interpeak latencies of the far field components recorded from nerck and right or left scalp and earlobe. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1980; 59: 382-403.
Anziska B, Gracco RQ, Look AW, Feld AW. Somatosensory far field potentials. Studies in patients with focal neurological disease. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1978; 1: 51–68.
Allison T, Goff WR, Williamson PD, van Gilder H. On the neural origin of early component of the human somatosensory evoked potential. In: Desmedt JE, ed. Clinical Use of Cerebral, Brainstem, and Spinal Somatosensory Evoked potentials Basel: Karger, 1978.
Stöhr M. Somatosensory evoked potentials-SEP. In: Maurer M, Lowitcsh K, Stöhr M, eds. Evozierte Potentiale. Stuttgart: Enke; 1988, p. 130–178.
Riffel B, Stöhr M, Körner S. Spinal and cortical evoked potentialas following stimulation of the posterior tibila nerrve in the diagnosis nad localization of spinal cord diseases. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1984; 58: 400–409.
Stöhr M, Dichgans J, Voigft K, Buettner UW. The signifiicance of somatosensory-evoked potentials for localization of unilateral lesions within the cerebral hemisphere. J Neurol Sci 1983; 61: 49–63.
Dorfman LJ, Bosley TM. Age related changes in peripheral and central nerve conduction in man. Neurology 1979; 29: 38–44.
Jörg H, Meldorn HM, Podenski R. Cerebral refractory period of somatosensory system: EEG and clinical findings before and after vascular surgery in cerebrovascular disease. Expt Med 1980; 526: 181.
Robertson CS, Foltz RB, Grossman RG, Goodman JC. Protection against experimental ischemic spinal cord injury. J Neurosurg 1986; 64: 633–642.
Grundy BL. Monitoring of sensory evoked potentialas during neurosurgical operations. methods and applications. Neurosurg 1982; 11: 556–562.
Randzeus PA. Intraoperative monitoring of evoked potentials. Ann NY Acad Sci 1982; 388: 308–311.
Schenk GK, Engelmeier M-P, Lodemann E, Pach J. Vigilanz, hirnorganisches Psychosyndrom und Pharmakotherapie, Aspekte der Reversilbilität. In: Bente D, Coper H, Kanowski S, eds. Hirnorganische Psychosyndrome im Alter Berlin. Heidelberg, New York: Springer, 1982: 74–113.
Mosko S, Pierce S, Holowach J, Sassni JF. Normal brain stem auditory evoked potentials recorded in sleep apneics during wakening and as a function of arterial oxygen saturation during sleep. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1981; 51: 477–485.
Little JR, Lesser RP, Lueders H, Furlan AJ. Brain stem auditory evokesd potentials in posterior circulation surgery. Neurosurgery 1983; 12: 496.
Jensen EW, Nygaard M, Henneberg SW. On-line analysis of the middle latency auditory evoked potentials (MLAEP) for monitoring depth of anaesthesia in laboratory rats. Med Eng Phys 1998; 20: 722–728.
Mignon A, Lecharnym JB, Fievet RR et al. Comparison of an Auditory Evoked Potentials Index (AAI) and a Bispectral Index (BIS) for Determining the Depth of Anesthesia Produced by Remifentanil in Cardiac Surgery. Anesthesiology 2001; 95: A 728.
Welschbillig S, Plantade N, Martinon C et al. Performance of the AAI index of AEP to predict loss of consciousness during propofol anesthesia. Anesthesiology 2001; 95: A 565.
Jensen EW, Litvan H, Caminal P et al. Comparison of the BIS and the Auditory Evoked Potentials Index (AAI) during propofol anesthesia for cardiac surgery. Anesthesiology 2000; 93: A 1370.
Tang J, Ma H, White PF, Wender RH. Comparative evaluation of Auditory Evoked Potential Index (AAI) and Bispectral IndexTM (BISTM) values during induction and emergence from ambulatory anesthesia. Anesthesiology 2003; 99: A 347.
Halliday HL. Evoked Potentials in Clinical Testing Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1983.
Grundy BL. Intraoperative application of evoked responses. In: Owen JH, Davis H, eds. Evoked Potential Testing. Clinical Applications. Orlando: Grune & Stratton; 1985, p. 159–212.
Boyd SG, Rothwell JC, Cowan JMA et al. A method of monitoring function in cortico-spinal pathways during scleorsis surgery with a note on motor conduction velocity. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiat 1986; 49.
Rosenstein J, Wang SD, Symon I, Suzuki K. Central conduction time and clinical guide for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg 1985; 62: 25–30.
Trojaborg W, Jorgensen EO. Evoked cortical responses in potentials with “isolectric” EEG. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1973; 35: 301–309.
Goldie WD, Chiappa KH, Young RR, Brooks EG. Brainstem auditory evoked and short-latency somatosensory evoked responses in brain death. Neurology 1981; 31: 248–256.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Freye, E. Cerebral Monitoring in the Operating Room and the Intensive Care Unit – An Introductory for the Clinician and a Guide for the Novice Wanting to Open a Window to the Brain. J Clin Monit Comput 19, 77–168 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-005-0713-y
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-005-0713-y