Skip to main content
Log in

Novel grid and sectoral analyses in monitoring corneal scars

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

We aim to design two sampling methods, the grid and sectoral methods, to provide more precise detection of focal corneal scar changes with time following pterygium excision with the Pentacam imaging system.

Methods

This is a retrospective study of our previous prospective observational case series. Thirty patients underwent primary pterygium excision with adjuvant topical mitomycin-C application were followed up and imaged with Pentacam system at postoperative weeks 1, 4, 12 and month 18. Grid and sectoral methods were used to sample density changes (in grayscale units, GSU) over the scarred areas as well as the clear pole of the same cornea.

Results

Using the grid method, the average corneal densities were 39.4, 37.1, 36.7 and 34.7 GSU at postoperative 1, 4, 12 weeks and 18 months, respectively. On the other hand, using the sectoral method, the average corneal densities were 35.3, 33.3, 32.5 and 31.9 GSU at postoperative 1, 4, 12 weeks and 18 months, respectively. Paired t tests achieved statistical significance when comparing all follow-up time points to first postoperative visit. A statistically significant effect of time on the average density was shown on ANOVA (p < 0.001) using both analyses over the scarred areas, but not over the clear pole of the same cornea (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

Our novel approach to monitor corneal density changes using the grid or sectoral sampling methods seemingly enhances the power in monitoring density changes in corneal scars when compared to conventional total-diameter average densitometry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Liu T, Liu Y, Xie L et al (2013) Progress in the pathogenesis of pterygium. Curr Eye Res 38:1191–1197

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kaufman SC, Jacobs DS, Lee WB et al (2013) Options and adjuvants in surgery for pterygium: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 120:201–208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Young AL, Ho M, Jhanji V et al (2013) Ten-year results of a randomized controlled trial comparing 0.02% mitomycin C and limbal conjunctival autograft in pterygium surgery. Ophthalmology 120:2390–2395

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tsim NC, Young AL, Jhanji V et al (2015) Combined conjunctival rotational autograft with 0.02% mitomycin C in primary pterygium surgery: a long-term follow-up study. Br J Ophthalmol 99:1396–1400

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Young AL (2013) The use of conjunctival rotational autograft in the management of pterygium. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila) 2:209–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kheirkhah A, Safi H, Molaei S et al (2012) Effects of pterygium surgery on front and back corneal astigmatism. Can J Ophthalmol 47:423–428

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kheirkhah A, Safi H, Nazari R et al (2012) Effects of pterygium surgery on front and back corneal surfaces and anterior segment parameters. Int Ophthalmol 32:251–257

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kam KW, Kwok RP, Belin MW et al (2016) Long term density changes in corneal layers following primary pterygium excision with topical mitomycin-C. Cornea 35:1093–1096

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kam KW, Belin MW, Young AL (2015) Monitoring corneal densities following primary pterygium excision with adjuvant topical mitomycin-C application—an observational study of corneal scar changes. Cornea 34:530–534

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pahuja N, Shetty R, Subbiah P et al (2016) Corneal densitometry: repeatability in eyes with keratoconus and postcollagen cross-linking. Cornea 35:833–837

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alvin L. Young.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kam, K.W., Li, A., Kwok, R.P.W. et al. Novel grid and sectoral analyses in monitoring corneal scars. Int Ophthalmol 39, 911–916 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-018-0897-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-018-0897-z

Keywords

Navigation