Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Granuloma after sling surgery: an attempt to answer the ‘why’ and ‘what to do next’

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To review cases of granuloma formation after sling surgery with a view to find out possible aetiological factors and propose a further plan of management

Materials and methods

A retrospective analysis of 120 eyes of 108 patients who underwent frontalis sling surgery with silicone rod from Jan 2008 to Dec 2015 was conducted. All patients with severe ptosis and poor levator function who underwent frontalis sling surgery with silicone rod were included in the study irrespective of the cause of ptosis and method of passing the sling. A complete ophthalmic and ptosis examination was done. In all the cases, the prolene suture was tied over the sleeve to tighten it and it was buried along with the silicone rod in forehead pocket. All the cases with granuloma formation were first subjected to a microbiological examination including culture and sensitivity to antibiotics. All the patients were given a trial of antibiotics.

Results

We encountered 10 cases of granuloma in 120 eyes of 108 patients operated during this period. The duration between time of surgery and presentation varied from 2 weeks to 4 months. The microbiological examination revealed positive culture in 5 cases. None of the cases responded to the course of antibiotics given for 10 days. The histopathological examination done in 5 cases (2 of them culture positive and 3 of them culture negative) revealed granulomatous inflammation of non-specific type. The sling was explanted in all cases which resulted in prompt resolution of granuloma in 7–10 days.

Conclusions

The granuloma is primarily due to exposure of the sling itself or the sleeve enveloping the sling or the suture tied around the sleeve thereby. They do not respond to antibiotics but respond very well to explantation. These patients can be taken up for re-sling surgery after a waiting period of 3 months.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tillett CW, Tillett GM (1966) Silicone sling in the correction of ptosis. Am J Ophthalmol 92:521–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fox SA (1966) Congenital ptosis: II. Frontalis sling. J Pediatr Ophthalmol 3:25–28

    Google Scholar 

  3. Van Sorng AJ, Devoglaere T, Sotodeh M, Wubbels R, Paridaens D (2010) Exposure keratopathy following silicone frontalis suspension in adult neuro and myogenic ptosis. Acta Ophthalmol 8:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  4. Morris CL, Buckley EG, Enyedi LB, Stinnett S, Freedman SF (2008) Safety and efficacy of silicone rode frontalis suspension surgery for childhood ptosis repair. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 45:280–288

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lelli GJ Jr, Musch DC, Fruech BR, Nelson CC (2009) Outcomes in silicone rod frontalis suspension surgery for high-risk non-congenital blepharoptosis. Ophthalmic Plast Resconstr Surg 25:361–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fogagnolo P, Serafino M, Nucci P (2008) Stability of silicone band frontalis suspension for the treatment of severe unilateral upper eyelid ptosis in infants. Eur J Ophthalmol 18(5):723–727

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jacob S, Agarwal A, Nair V, Karnati S, Kumar DA, Prakash G (2012) Comparison of outcomes of suprabrow single-stab and 3-stab incision frontalis sling surgery. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol 1(2):91–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Simon GJB, Macedo AA et al (2005) Frontalis suspension for upper eyelid ptosis: evaluation of different surgical designs and suture material. Am J Ophthalmol 140(5):877–885

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wagner R, Mauriello JA Jr, Nelson LB et al (1984) Treatment of congenital ptosis with frontalis suspension: a comparison of suspensory materials. Ophthalmology 91:245–248

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu D (1999) Blepharoptosis correction with frontalis suspension using a nylon monofilament sling: duration of effect. Am J Ophthalmol 128:772–773

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wasserman B, Sprunger DT, Helveston EM (2001) Comparison of materials used in frontalis suspension. Arch Ophthalmol 119:687–691

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee MJ, Oh JY, Choung HK, Kim NJ, Sung MS, Khwarg SI (2009) Frontalis sling operation using silicone rod compared with preserved fascia lata for congenital ptosis a three-year follow-up study. Ophthalmology 116:123–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chang S, Lehrman C, Itani K, Rohrich RJ (2012) A systematic review of comparison of upper eyelid involutional ptosis repair techniques: efficacy and complication rates. Plast Reconstr Surg 129(1):149–157

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors contribution

All the authors were involved in the concept and design of the study, data acquisition, data analysis and interpretation, drafting manuscript, technical support and final review of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ophthalmology, V.M.M.C and Safdarjung Hospital, Room No. 430 of Eye OPD, 4th floor of OPD building, Ansari Nagar, Ring Road, New Delhi, 110029, India

    Anuj Mehta, Mayuresh Naik, Sangeeta Abrol & Mukesh Joshi

  2. Department of Ophthalmology, P.G.I.M.E.R and R.M.L Hospital, New Delhi, India

    Prerna Garg

Authors
  1. Anuj Mehta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mayuresh Naik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sangeeta Abrol
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Prerna Garg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mukesh Joshi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mayuresh Naik.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mehta, A., Naik, M., Abrol, S. et al. Granuloma after sling surgery: an attempt to answer the ‘why’ and ‘what to do next’. Int Ophthalmol 37, 973–977 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-016-0342-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-016-0342-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation