Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The effect of sterilization on mechanical properties of soft tissue allografts

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Cell and Tissue Banking Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One major concern regarding soft tissue allograft use in surgical procedures is the risk of disease transmission. Current techniques of tissue sterilization, such as irradiation have been shown to adversely affect the mechanical properties of soft tissues. Grafts processed using Biocleanse processing (a proprietary technique developed by Regeneration Technologies to sterilize human tissues) will have better biomechanical characteristics than tissues that have been irradiated. Fifteen pairs of cadaveric Achilles tendon allografts were obtained and separated into three groups of 10 each. Three treatment groups were: Biocleanse, Irradiated, and Control (untreated). Each specimen was tested to determine the biomechanical properties of the tissue. Specimens were cyclically preloaded and then loaded to failure in tension. During testing, load, displacement, and optical strain data were captured. Following testing, the cross sectional area of the tendons was determined. Tendons in the control group were found to have a higher extrinsic stiffness (slope of the load–deformation curve, p = .005), have a higher ultimate stress (force/cross sectional area, p = .006) and higher ultimate failure load (p = .003) than irradiated grafts. Biocleanse grafts were also found to be stiffer than irradiated grafts (p = .014) yet were not found to be statistically different from either irradiated or non-irradiated grafts in terms of load to failure. Biocleanse processing seems to be a viable alternative to irradiation for Achilles tendon allografts sterilization in terms of their biomechanical properties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bailey AJ, Tromans WJ (1964) Effects of ionizing radiation on the ultrastructure of collagen fibrils. Radiat Res 23:145–155

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Buck BE, Malinin TI, Brown MD (1989) Bone transplantation and human immunodeficiency virus. An estimate of risk of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). Clin Orthop Relat Res 240:129–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson ER, Marx RE, Buck BE (1995) The potential for HIV transmission through allogeneic bone. A review of risks and safety. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 80:17–23

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2001) Septic arthritis following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using tendon allografts–Florida and Louisiana, 2000. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 50:1081–1083

    Google Scholar 

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2002) Update: allograft–associated bacterial infections–United States, 2002. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 51:207–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang SKY, Egami DK, Shaieb MD, Kan DM, Richardson AB (2003) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: allograft versus autograft. Arthroscopy 19:453–462

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Deyne P, Haut RC (1991) Some effects of gamma irradiation on patellar tendon allografts. Connect Tissue Res 27:51–62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fideler BM, Vangsness CT Jr, Lu B, Orlando C, Moore T (1995) Gamma irradiation: effects on biomechanical properties of human bone-patellar tendon-bone allografts. Am J Sports Med 23:643–646

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons MJ, Butler DL, Grood ES, Bylski-Austrow DI, Levy MS, Noyes FR (1991) Effects of gamma irradiation on the initial mechanical and material properties of goat bone-patellar tendon-bone allografts. J Orthop Res 9:209–218

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harner CD, Olson E, Irrgang JJ, Silverstein S, Fu FH, Silbey M (1996) Allograft versus autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: 3- to 5-year outcome. Clin Orthop Relat Res 324:134–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Indelicato PA, Linton RC, Huegel M (1992) The results of fresh-frozen patellar tendon allografts for chronic anterior cruciate ligament deficiency of the knee. Am J Sports Med 20:118–121

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson DW, Windler GE, Simon TM (1990) Intraarticular reaction associated with the use of freeze-dried, ethylene oxide-sterilized bone-patella tendon-bone allografts in the reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med 18:1–10 discussion 10–11

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jones DB, Huddleston PM, Zobitz ME, Stuart MJ (2007) Mechanical properties of patellar tendon allografts subjected to chemical sterilization. Arthroscopy 23:400–404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kainer MA, Linden JV, Whaley DN, Holmes HT, Jarvis WR, Jernigan DB, Archibald LK (2004) Clostridium infections associated with musculoskeletal-tissue allografts. N Engl J Med 350:2564–2571

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nikolaou PK, Seaber AV, Glisson RR, Ribbeck BM, Bassett FH 3rd (1986) Anterior cruciate ligament allograft transplantation. Long-term function, histology, revascularization, and operative technique. Am J Sports Med 14:348–360

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Noyes FR, Butler DL, Grood ES, Zernicke RF, Hefzy MS (1984) Biomechanical analysis of human ligament grafts used in knee-ligament repairs and reconstructions. J Bone Joint Surg Am 66:344–352

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Noyes FR, Barber SD, Mangine RE (1990) Bone-patellar ligament-bone and fascia lata allografts for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:1125–1136

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson RK, Shelton WR, Bomboy AL (2001) Allograft versus autograft patellar tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a 5-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 17:9–13

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prodromos C, Joyce B, Shi K (2007) A meta-analysis of stability of autografts compared to allografts after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:851–856

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rincón L, Schatzmann L, Brunner P, Stäubli HU, Ferguson SJ, Oxland TR, Nolte LP (2001) Design and evaluation of a cryogenic soft tissue fixation device—load tolerances and thermal aspects. J Biomech 34:393–397

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts TS, Drez D Jr, McCarthy W, Paine R (1991) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using freeze-dried, ethylene oxide-sterilized, bone-patellar tendon-bone allografts. Two year results in thirty-six patients. Am J Sports Med 19:35–41

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Salehpour A, Butler DL, Proch FS, Schwartz HE, Feder SM, Doxey CM, Ratcliffe A (1995) Dose-dependent response of gamma irradiation on mechanical properties and related biochemical composition of goat bone-patellar tendon-bone allografts. J Orthop Res 13:898–906

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schimizzi A, Wedemeyer M, Odell T, Thomas W, Mahar AT, Pedowitz R (2007) Effects of a novel sterilization process on soft tissue mechanical properties for anterior cruciate ligament allografts. Am J Sports Med 35:612–616

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shelton WR, Papendick L, Dukes AD (1997) Autograft versus allograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 13:446–449

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shino K, Kimura T, Hirose H, Inoue M, Ono K (1986) Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament by allogeneic tendon graft. An operation for chronic ligamentous insufficiency. J Bone Joint Surg Br 68:739–746

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wainer RA, Clarke TJ, Poehling GG (1988) Arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament using allograft tendon. Arthroscopy 4:199–205

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zoltan DJ, Reinecke C, Indelicato PA (1988) Synthetic and allograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Sports Med 7:773–784

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was partially supported by a research grant from Regeneration Technologies, Inc. The authors would like to thank Abdullah Abbasi for assistance in preparing this manuscript for publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine Institute, University of Florida, 3450 Hull Rd., Gainesville, FL, 32607, USA

    Bryan P. Conrad, MaryBeth Horodyski, Kevin W. Farmer & Peter A. Indelicato

  2. Knoxville Orthopaedic Clinic, Jefferson City, TN, USA

    Matthew Rappé

Authors
  1. Bryan P. Conrad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Matthew Rappé
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. MaryBeth Horodyski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kevin W. Farmer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Peter A. Indelicato
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bryan P. Conrad.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Conrad, B.P., Rappé, M., Horodyski, M. et al. The effect of sterilization on mechanical properties of soft tissue allografts. Cell Tissue Bank 14, 359–366 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10561-012-9340-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10561-012-9340-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation