Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Relation Between Sexual Behavior and Religiosity Subtypes: A Test of the Secularization Hypothesis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous literature on religion and sexual behavior has focused on narrow definitions of religiosity, including religious affiliation, religious participation, or forms of religiousness (e.g., intrinsic religiosity). Trends toward more permissive premarital sexual activity in the North American Christian-Judeo religion support the secularization hypothesis of religion, which posits an increasing gap between religious doctrine and behavior. However, the recent rise of fundamentalist and new age religious movements calls for a reexamination of the current link between religion and sexual behavior. The use of dual definitions of religiosity, including religious affiliation and dimensional subtypes, may further characterize this link. The present cross-sectional study evaluated patterns of sexual behavior in a young adult sample (N = 1302, M age = 18.77 years) in the context of the secularization hypothesis using religious affiliation and a liberal-conservative continuum of religious subtypes: paranormal belief, spirituality, intrinsic religiosity, and fundamentalism. Results indicated few affiliation differences in sexual behavior in men or women. Sexual behaviors were statistically predicted by spirituality, fundamentalism, and paranormal belief, and the endorsement of fundamentalism in particular was correlated with lower levels of female sexual behavior. The secularization hypothesis was supported by consistent levels of sexual activity across affiliations and is contradicted by the differential impact of religiosity subtypes on sexual behavior. Findings suggested that the use of religious subtypes to evaluate religious differences, rather than solely affiliation, may yield useful insights into the link between religion and sexual behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allport, G. W. (1950). The individual and his religion: A psychological interpretation. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altemeyer, B., & Hunsberger, B. (1992). Authoritarianism, religious fundamentalism, quest, and prejudice. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 2, 113–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bainbridge, W. S. (2004). After the new age. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 43, 381–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bainbridge, W. S. (2005). Atheism. Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion, 1(1), Article 2. http://www.bepress.com/ijrr/vol1/iss1/art2.

  • Bang, E., Hall, M. E. L., Anderson, T. L., & Willingham, M. M. (2005). Ethnicity, acculturation, and religiosity as predictors of female college students’ role expectations. Sex Roles, 53, 231–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barkan, S. E. (2006). Religiosity and premarital sex in adulthood. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 45, 407–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bearman, P. S., & Bruckner, H. (1999). Power in numbers: Peer effects on adolescent girls’ sexual debut and pregnancy. Washington, DC: The National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, S. H., Cole, B. S., & Hammond, J. A. (1991). Religious heritage and premarital sex: Evidence from a national sample of young adults. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 30, 173–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. (1967). The sacred canopy. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (1995). Psychological sex differences Origins through sexual selection. American Psychologist, 50, 164–168.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, J. K., & Beeghley, L. (1991). The influence of religion on attitudes toward nonmarital sexuality: A preliminary assessment of Reference Group Theory. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 30, 45–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, J. K., Chamlin, M. B., Beeghley, L., & Fenwick, M. (2004). Religion, religiosity, and nonmarital sexual conduct: An application of Reference Group Theory. Sociological Inquiry, 74, 102–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, J. K., Darling, C. A., & Norton, L. (1995). Religiosity and the sexuality of women: Sexual behavior and sexual satisfaction revisited. Journal of Sex Research, 32, 235–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, J. K., Moore, N. B., & Ullstrup, K. M. (2004). Religiosity and sexual responsibility: Relationships of choice. American Journal of Health Behavior, 28, 335–346.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DeLamater, J. (1981). The social control of sexuality. Annual Review of Sociology, 7, 263–290.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Derogatis, L. R. (1979). The DSFI: A multidimensional measure of sexual functioning. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 5, 244–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobbelaere, K. (1999). Towards an integrated perspective of the processes related to the descriptive concept of secularization. Sociology of Religion, 60, 229–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donahue, M. J. (1985). Intrinsic and extrinsic religiousness: Review and metal-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 400–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emmons, C. F., & Sobal, J. (1981). Paranormal beliefs: Functional alternatives to mainstream religion? Review of Religious Research, 22, 301–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finke, R., & Stark, R. (2001). The new holy clubs: Testing church-to-sect propositions. Sociology of Religion, 62, 175–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorsuch, R. L., & Venable, G. D. (1983). Development of an “age universal” I-E scale. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 22, 181–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, B. C. (2000). Religious independents within western industrialized nations: A socio- demographic profile. Sociology of Religion, 61, 191–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1997). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, M. J., Piedmont, R. L., Fialkowski, G. M., Wicks, R. J., & Hunt, M. E. (2005). Sexuality and spirituality: The Embodied Spirituality Scale. Theology & Sexuality, 12, 81–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunsberger, B. (1996). Religious fundamentalism, right-wing authoritarianism, and hostility toward homosexuals in non-Christian religious groups. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 6, 39–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunsberger, B., Owusu, V., & Duck, R. (1999). Religion and prejudice in Ghana and Canada: Religious fundamentalism, right-wing authoritarianism, and attitudes toward homosexuals and women. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 9, 181–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyman, C., & Handal, P. J. (2006). Definitions and evaluation of religion and spirituality items by religious professionals: A pilot study. Journal of Religion and Health, 45, 264–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, H. J. (1993). Belief in the paranormal: A review of the empirical literature. Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research, 87, 1–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, L., Newell, R. J., & Holman, T. (1990). Sexual behavior, church attendance, and permissive beliefs among unmarried young men and women. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 29, 113–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., & Martin, C. E. (1948). Sexual behavior in the human male. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., Martin, C. E., & Gebhard, P. H. (1953). Sexual behavior in the human female. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laumann, E. O., Gagnon, J. H., Michael, R. T., & Michaels, S. (1994). The social organization of sexuality: Sexual practices in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefkowitz, E. S., Gillen, M. M., Shearer, C. L., & Boone, T. L. (2004). Religiosity, sexual behaviors, and sexual attitudes during emerging adulthood. Journal of Sex Research, 41, 150–159.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leiblum, S., Wiegel, M., & Brickle, F. (2003). Sexual attitudes of US and Canadian medical students: The role of ethnicity, gender, religion, and acculturation. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 18, 473–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lottes, I. L., & Kuriloff, P. J. (1994). Sexual socialization differences by gender, Greek membership, ethnicity, and religious background. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 203–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marler, P. L., & Hadaway, C. K. (2002). “Being religious” or “Being spiritual” in America: A zero-sum proposition? Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 41, 289–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R. (1996). Social consequences of experimental openness. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 323–337.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, B. C., & Olson, T. D. (1988). Sexual attitudes and behavior of high school students in relation to background and contextual factors. Journal of Sex Research, 24, 194–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, A. S., & Stark, R. (2002). Gender and religiousness: Can socialization explanations be saved? American Journal of Sociology, 107, 1399–1423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray-Swank, N. A., Pargament, K. I., & Mahoney, A. (2005). At the crossroads of sexuality and spirituality: The sanctification of sex by college students. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 15, 199–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Notzer, N., Levran, D., Mashiach, S., & Soffer, S. (1984). Effect of religiosity on sex attitudes, experience and contraception among university students. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 10, 57–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orenstein, A. (2002). Religion and paranormal belief. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 41, 301–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pluhar, E., Frongillo, E. A., Stycos, J. M., & Dempser-McClain, D. (1998). Understanding the relationship between religion and the sexual attitudes and behaviors of college students. Journal of Sex Education and Therapy, 23, 288–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, K. R. (Ed.). (1984). The basic experiments in parapsychology. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, T. W. (2003). Believe it or not: Religious and other paranormal beliefs in the United States. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 42, 95–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, T., & Dick, A. (Eds.). (1990). In gods we trust: New patterns of religious pluralism in America. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University.

  • Rowatt, W. C., & Schmitt, D. P. (2003). Associations between religious orientation and varieties of sexual experience. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 42, 455–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saroglou, V. (2002). Religion and the five factors of personality: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 15–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saucier, G. (2000). Isms and the structure of social attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 366–385.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saucier, G., & Skrzypinska, K. (2006). Spiritual but not religious? Evidence for two independent eispositions. Journal of Personality, 74, 1257–1292.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, J. A., & Gangestad, S. W. (1991). Individual differences in sociosexuality: Evidence for convergent and discriminant validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 870–883.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T. (1990). Classifying protestant denominations. Review of Religious Research, 31, 225–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sommerville, C. J. (1998). Secular society/religious population: Our tacit rules for using the term ‘secularization’. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 37, 249–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stark, R. (2002). Physiology and faith: Addressing the ‘universal’ gender difference in religious commitment. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 41, 495–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stark, R., & Bainbridge, W. S. (1985). The future of religion: Secularization, revival and cult formation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, R., & Bainbridge, W. S. (1987). A theory of religion. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Studer, M., & Thornton, A. (1987). Adolescent religiosity and contraceptive usage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49, 117–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, A., & Camburn, D. (1989). Religious participation and adolescent sexual behavior and attitudes. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 641–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobacyk, J. J., & Milford, G. (1983). Belief in paranormal phenomena: Assessment instrument development and implications for personality functioning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 1029–1037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trapnell, P. (2005). A brief, balanced measure of New Age paranormal beliefs. Unpublished raw data, University of Winnipeg. http://www.paultrapnell.com/measures/Transpersonal&ParanormalBeliefScale-and-SpiritualityScale.rtf.

  • Visser, R. O., Smith, A. M. A., Richters, J., & Rissel, C. E. (2007). Associations between religiosity and sexuality in a representative sample of Australian adults. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 33–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, A., Egan, V., & Figueredo, A. J. (2004). Sensational interests as a form of intrasexual competition. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 563–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaleski, E. H., & Schiaffino, K. M. (2000). Religiosity and sexual risk-taking behavior during the transition to college. Journal of Adolescence, 23, 223–227.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada

    Melissa A. Farmer

  2. Department of Psychology, University of Winnipeg, Winnipeg, MB, Canada

    Paul D. Trapnell

  3. Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, 108 E. Dean Keeton, A 8000, Austin, TX, 78712, USA

    Cindy M. Meston

Authors
  1. Melissa A. Farmer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Paul D. Trapnell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Cindy M. Meston
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cindy M. Meston.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Farmer, M.A., Trapnell, P.D. & Meston, C.M. The Relation Between Sexual Behavior and Religiosity Subtypes: A Test of the Secularization Hypothesis. Arch Sex Behav 38, 852–865 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-008-9407-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-008-9407-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation