Abstract
Older patients with dementia and delirium receive suboptimal hospital care. Policy calls for more effective education to address this though there is little consensus on what this entails. The purpose of this clarification study is to explore how practice gaps are constructed in relation to managing the confused hospitalised older patient. The intent is to inform educational processes in the work-place beyond traditional approaches such as training. Adopting grounded theory as a research method and working within a social constructionist paradigm we explored the practice gaps of 15 healthcare professionals by interview and conducted five focus groups with patients, carers and Liaison mental health professionals. Data were thematically analysed by constant comparison and theoretical sampling was undertaken until saturation reached. Categories were identified and pragmatic concepts developed grounded within the data. Findings were then further analysed using cultural historical activity theory as a deductive lens. Practice gaps in relation to managing the confused older patient are determined by factors operating at individual (knowledge and skill gaps, personal philosophy, task based practice), team (leadership, time and ward environmental factors) and organisational (power relationships, dominance of medical model, fragmentation of care services) levels. Conceptually, practice appeared to be influenced by socio-cultural ward factors and compounded by a failure to join up existing “patient” knowledge amongst professionals. Applying cultural historical activity theory to further illuminate the findings, the central object is defined as learning about the patient and the mediating artifacts are the care relationships. The overarching medical dominance emerges as an important cultural historical factor at play and staff rules and divisions of labour are exposed. Lastly key contradictions and tensions in the system that work against learning about the patient are identified. Cultural historical activity theory can be used to advance understanding of practice gaps in order to develop a broader transformative approach to dementia and delirium practice and education. Structural changes at an individual, team and systems level resulting from this novel understanding of practice complexity are proposed. Contradictions can be used as foci for expansive learning. Lastly, interprofessional education (formal and informal) is advocated to further knotwork and improve the care of the older confused patient.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alzheimer’s Society. (2009). Counting the cost. London: Alzheimer’s Society.
Bamford, C., & Bruce, E. (2002). Successes and challenges in using focus groups with older people in dementia: Research methods and motivations. In H. Wilkinson (Ed.), The perspectives of people with dementia. London, Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley.
Berwick, D. M., & Finkelstein, J. A. (2010). Preparing medical students for the continual improvement of health and health care: Abraham Flexner and the new “public interest”. Academic Medicine, 85(9), S56–S65.
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2007). Teaching for quality learning at university (3rd ed.). New York City: Open University Press.
Billett, S., Harteis, C., & Etelapelto, A. (2008). Emerging perspectives of workplace learning. Rotterdam: Sense.
Bleakley, A. (2006). Broadening conceptions of learning in medical education: The message from teamworking. Medical Education, 40, 150–157.
Bleakley, A. (2013a). Working in “teams” in an era of “liquid” healthcare: What is the use of theory? Journal of Interprofessional Care, 27(1), 18–26.
Bleakley, A. (2013b). The dislocation of medical dominance: Making space for interprofessional care. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 27(2), 24–30.
Bleakley, A. (2014). Patient-centred medicine in transition: The heart of the matter. Cornwall: Springer.
Bleakley, A., Bligh, J., & Browne, J. (2011). Medical education for the future: Identity, power and location. London: Springer Science.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.
Carter, S. M., & Little, M. (2007). Justifying knowledge, justifying method, taking action: Epistemologies, methodologies, and methods in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 17(10), 1316–1328.
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory; a practical guide through qualitative analysis (1st ed.). California: Sage.
Chen, F. M., Bauchner, H., & Burstin, H. (2004). A call for outcomes research in medical education. Academic Medicine, 79(10), 955–960.
Cook, D. A., Bordage, G., & Schmidt, H. G. (2008). Description, justification and clarification: A framework for classifying the purposes of research in medical education. Medical Education, 42(2), 128–133.
de Feijter, J. M., de Grave, W. S., Dornan, T., Koopmans, R. P., & Scherpbier, A. J. (2011). Students’ perceptions of patient safety during the transition from undergraduate to postgraduate training: An activity theory analysis. Advances in Health Sciences Education: Theory and Practice, 16(3), 347–358.
Department of Health. (2007). National audit on services for patients with dementia. London.
Department of Health. (2009). Living well with dementia: A national dementia strategy. London.
Department of Health. (2013). The prime ministers challenge on dementia. Delivering major improvements in dementia care and research by 2015: Annual report of progress.
Edwards, A., & Kinti, I. (2010). Working relationally at organisational boundaries. In H. Daniels, A. Edwards, Y. Engestrom, T. Gallagher, & S. Ludvigsen (Eds.), Activity theory in practice: Promoting learning across boundaries and agencies (pp. 126–139). New York: Routledge.
Engestrom, Y. (1995). Objects, contradictions and collaboration in medical cognition: An activity-theoretical perspective. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 75, 395–412.
Engestrom, Y. (2000). Activity theory as a framework for analyzing and redesigning work. Ergonomics, 43(7), 960–974.
Engestrom, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Towards an activity-theoretical reconceptualisation. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156.
Engestrom, Y. (2009). Expansive learning: Toward an activity-theoretical reconceptualization. In K. Illeris (Ed.), Contemporary theories of learning (pp. 53–74).
Eva, K. W. (2009). Broadening the debate about quality in medical education research. Medical Education, 43(4), 294–296.
Francis, R. (2013). Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS foundation trust public inquiry. London: The Stationary Office.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. London: Penguin.
Holmes, J., Bentley, K., & Cameron, I. (2002). Between two stools: Psychiatric services for older people in hospitals. Leeds: University of Leeds.
Holton, E. F. I. (1996). The flawed four level model. Human Resource Developement Quarterly, 7, 5–21.
Illing, J. (2007). Thinking about research: Framework, ethics and scholarship. Edinburgh: Association for the Study of Medical Education.
Jenny, J., & Logan, J. (1992). Knowing the patient: One aspect of clinical knowledge. Image - The Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 24(4), 254–258.
Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1994). Evaluating training programs: The four levels. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
Kirwan, C., & Birchall, D. (2006). Transfer of learning from management development programmes: Testing the Holton Model. International Journal of Training and Development, 10(4), 252–268.
Knowles, M. (1984). Andragogy in action. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. California: Sage.
Lingard, L., McDougall, A., Levstik, M., Chandok, N., Spafford, M. M., & Schryer, C. (2012). Representing complexity well: A story about teamwork, with implications for how we teach collaboration. Medical Education, 46(9), 869–877.
Lockyer, J. (1998). Needs assessment: Lessons learned. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 18, 190–192.
Ludmerer, K. M. (2000). Time and medical education. Annals of Internal Medicine, 132, 25–28.
Marshall, M. (2001). The challenge of looking after people with dementia. BMJ, 323(7310), 410–411.
Morris, C. (2009). Developing pedagogy for doctors-as-teachers: The role of activity theory. London: Routledge.
Morris, C. (2010). Work-based learning. In T. Swanwick (Ed.), Understanding medical education (pp. 69–82). Oxford: Wiley.
National Audit Office. (2010). Improving dementia services—An interim report. London: National Audit Office.
National Institute of Clinical Excellence. (2006). Dementia clinical guideline 42. London: National Institute of Clinical Excellence.
Prideaux, D., & Bligh, J. (2002). Research in medical education: Asking the right questions. Medical Education, 36(12), 1114–1115.
Prystowsky, J. B., & Bordage, G. (2001). An outcomes research perspective on medical education: The predominance of trainee assessment and satisfaction. Medical Education, 35(4), 331–336.
RCPsych. (2005). Who cares wins: Improving the outcome for older people admitted to the general hospital. London: RCPsych.
Regehr, G. (2010). It’s NOT rocket science: Rethinking our metaphors for research in health professions education. Medical Education, 44, 31–39.
Sampson, E. L., Blanchard, M. R., Jones, L., Tookman, A., & King, M. (2009). Dementia in the acute hospital: Prospective cohort study of prevalence and mortality. British Journal of Psychiatry, 195(1), 61–66.
Schon, D. (1991). The reflective practitioner: How professional think in action. Aldershot: Avebury.
Swanwick, T. (2005). Informal learning in postgraduate medical education: From cognitivism to ‘culturism’. Medical Education, 39(8), 859–865.
Teodorczuk, A., Corbett, S., Welfare, M., & Mukaetova Ladinska, E. (2013). Reconceptualising models of delirium education: Findings of a grounded theory study. International Psychogeriatrics, 25(4), 645–655.
Teodorczuk, A., Mukaetova Ladinska, E., Welfare, M., & Corbett, S. (2009a). The learning needs of general hospital clinical staff: Preliminary results. Journal of Dementia Care, 17(4), 37–38.
Teodorczuk, A., Mukaetova-Ladinska, E., Corbett, S., & Welfare, M. (2014). Learning about the patient: An innovative Interprofessional dementia and delirium education programme. Clinical Teacher (in press).
Teodorczuk, A., Welfare, M., Corbett, S., & Mukaetova-Ladinska, E. (2009b). Education, hospital staff and the confused older patient. Age and Ageing, 38, 252–253.
Teodorczuk, A., Welfare, M., Corbett, S., & Mukaetova-Ladinska, E. (2010). Developing effective educational approaches for Liaison Old Age Psychiatry teams: A literature review of the learning needs of hospital staff in relation to managing the confused older patient. International Psychogeriatrics, 22(6), 874–885.
Whitcomb, M. E. (2002). Research in medical education: What do we know about the link between what doctors are taught and what they do? Academic Medicine, 77(11), 1067–1068.
Witlox, J., Eurelings, L. S., de Jonghe, J. F., Kalisvaart, K. J., Eikelenboom, P., & van Gool, W. A. (2010). Delirium in elderly patients and the risk of post discharge mortality, institutionalization, and dementia: A meta-analysis. JAMA, 304(4), 443–451.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the research steering group, Mrs Barbara Dowd, Mr Harvey Thomson, Mr Garth Miller and the late Mr John Dowswell. We are also most grateful to Professor Jan Illing and Dr Bryan Burford for comments with earlier drafts of the manuscript. Funded by Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust.
Conflict of interest
None.
Ethical standard
Ethical approval was granted by the “Newcastle and North Tyneside Research Ethics Committee 1” in December 2008.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Teodorczuk, A., Mukaetova-Ladinska, E., Corbett, S. et al. Deconstructing dementia and delirium hospital practice: using cultural historical activity theory to inform education approaches. Adv in Health Sci Educ 20, 745–764 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-014-9562-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-014-9562-0