Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Aortic valve repair for aortic regurgitation and preoperative echocardiographic assessment

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Ultrasonics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aortic valvuloplasty (AVP) has been performed less frequently than mitral valvuloplasty. The survival benefit of AVP over replacement has been demonstrated. Therefore, standardization of AVP is crucial for its widespread adoption. The hemodynamic advantage of AVP of preserving the native aortic valve may be one reason for the survival benefit. Recent guidelines still recommend AVP in selected cases compared with the less restricted recommendation for mitral valvuloplasty, although recent studies have proposed earlier indication for surgical intervention. Indication for aortic root replacement is also still conservative, especially in Japan. However, more liberal root replacement should be recommended for better repair when AVP is indicated. Theoretically, all aortic regurgitation lesions can be repaired with acceptable durability. However, restricted cusp should be extended by a pericardial patch, which itself has emerged as a risk of recurrence. Therefore, indications for aortic regurgitation for type III lesions should be determined carefully. Special consideration is crucial for bicuspid aortic valve repair; prevention of postoperative stenosis is especially important. Arrangement of the commissure position is the most important consideration for this purpose, although it remains controversial. Therefore, detailed diagnosis is important in planning AVP, and echocardiography plays a key role in this process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Reproduced with permission from [8]

Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Reproduced with permission from [41]

Fig. 5
Fig. 6

a reproduced with permission from [45], b reproduced with permission from [46], c reproduced with permission from [48], d reproduced with permission from [48]

Fig. 7
Fig. 8

(a) Reproduced with permission from [51], (b) reproduced with permission from [57]

Fig. 9

(a) Reproduced with permission from [58], (b) reproduced with permission from [58]

Fig. 10
Fig. 11

(a) reproduced with permission from [58], (b) reproduced with permission from [58], (c) reproduced with permission from [62]

Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Committee for Scientific Affairs, The Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery, Masuda M, Okumura M, Doki Y, et al. Thoracic and cardiovascular surgery in Japan during: annual report by the Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;2016(64):665–97.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Iung B, Baron G, Butchart EG, et al. A prospective survey of patients with valvular heart disease in Europe: the Euro heart survey on valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J. 2003;24:1231–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Beckmann A, Funkat AK, Lewandowski J, et al. German heart surgery report 2015: the annual updated registry of the German society for thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;64:462–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Stamou SC, Williams ML, Gunn TM, et al. Aortic root surgery in the United States: a report from the society of thoracic surgeons database. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;149(116–22):e4.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Committee for Scientific Affairs, The Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery, Masuda M, Kuwano H, Okumura M, et al. Thoracic and cardiovascular surgery in Japan during, annual report by The Japanese association for thoracic surgery. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;2014(62):734–64.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Arimura S, Seki M, Sasaki K, et al. A nationwide survey of aortic valve surgery in Japan: current status of valve preservation in cases with aortic regurgitation. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;65:429–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schäfers HJ, Bierbach B, Aicher D. A new approach to the assessment of aortic cusp geometry. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;132:436–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Boodhwani M, de Kerchove L, Glineur D, et al. Repair-oriented classification of aortic insufficiency: impact on surgical techniques and clinical outcomes. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;137:286–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Malas T, Saczkowski R, Sohmer B, et al. Is aortic valve repair reproducible? Analysis of the learning curve for aortic valve repair. Can J Cardiol. 2015;31:1497.e15–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kunihara T. Toward standardization of valve-sparing root replacement and annuloplasty. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. (in press).

  11. de Meester C, Pasquet A, Gerber BL, et al. Valve repair improves the outcome of surgery for chronic severe aortic regurgitation: a propensity score analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;148:1913–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ouzounian M, Rao V, Manlhiot C, et al. Valve-sparing root replacement compared with composite valve graft procedures in patients with aortic root dilation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68:1838–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Forcillo J, Pellerin M, Perrault LP, et al. Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve in the aortic position: 25 years experience. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;96:486–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mookhoek A, Korteland NM, Arabkhani B, et al. Bentall procedure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;101:1684–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rahimtoola SH. The problem of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch. Circulation. 1978;58:20–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Graeter TP, Fries R, Aicher D, Reul H, Schmitz C, Schäfers HJ. In-vitro comparison of aortic valve hemodynamics between aortic root remodeling and aortic valve reimplantation. J Heart Valve Dis. 2006;15:329–35.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Zeeshan A, Idrees JJ, Johnston DR, Rajeswaran J, Roselli EE, Soltesz EG, Gillinov AM, Griffin B, Grimm R, Hammer DF, Pettersson GB, Blackstone EH, Sabik JF 3rd, Svensson LG. Durability of aortic valve cusp repair with and without annular support. Ann Thorac Surg. 2018;105:739–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Thudt M, Papadopoulos N, Monsefi N, Miskovic A, Karimian-Tabrizi A, Zierer A, Moritz A. Long-Term results following pericardial patch augmentation for incompetent bicuspid aortic valves: a single center experience. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017;103:1186–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Vohra HA, Whistance RN, de Kerchove L, et al. Influence of higher valve gradient on long-term outcome after aortic valve repair. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;2:30–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, ACC, AHA Task Force Members, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: executive summary: a report of the American college of cardiology/american heart association task force on practice guidelines. Circulation. 2014;2014(129):2440–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Falk V, Baumgartner H, Bax JJ, De Bonis M, Hamm C, Holm PJ, Iung B, Lancellotti P, Lansac E, Muñoz DR, Rosenhek R, Sjögren J, Tornos Mas P, Vahanian A, Walther T, Wendler O, Windecker S, Zamorano JL, ESC Scientific Document Group. 2017 ESC/EACTS guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017;52:616–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Chaliki HP, Mohty D, Avierinos JF, Scott CG, Schaff HV, Tajik AJ, Enriquez-Sarano M. Outcomes after aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic regurgitation and markedly reduced left ventricular function. Circulation. 2002;106:2687–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sharma V, Suri RM, Dearani JA, Burkhart HM, Park SJ, Joyce LD, Li Z, Schaff HV. Expanding relevance of aortic valve repair-is earlier operation indicated? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;147:100–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tornos P, Sambola A, Permanyer-Miralda G, et al. Long-term outcome of surgically treated aortic regurgitation: influence of guideline adherence toward early surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:1012–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Brown ML, Schaff HV, Suri RM, et al. Indexed left ventricular dimensions best predict survival after aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic valve regurgitation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;87:1170–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang Y, Shi J, Li F, et al. Aortic valve replacement for severe aortic regurgitation in asymptomatic patients with normal ejection fraction and severe left ventricular dilatation. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016;22:425–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with thoracic aortic disease representative members, 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease representative members, Nishimura RA, Bonow RO, Guyton RA, Hiratzka LF, Creager MA, Isselbacher EM, et al. Surgery for aortic dilatation in patients with bicuspid aortic valves: a statement of clarification from the American college of cardiology/american heart association task force on clinical practice guidelines. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;151:959–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Erbel R, Aboyans V, Boileau C, ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines, et al. 2014 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases: document covering acute and chronic aortic diseases of the thoracic and abdominal aorta of the adult. The task force for the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases of the european society of cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2014;35:2873–926.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Guidelines for surgical and interventional treatment of valvular heart disease JCS 2012. http://www.j-circ.or.jp/guideline/pdf/JCS2012_ookita_h.pdf.

  30. JCS Joint Working Group. Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection (JCS 2011): digest version. Circ J. 2013;77:789–828.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. de Kerchove L, Boodhwani M, Glineur D, et al. Valve sparing-root replacement with the reimplantation technique to increase the durability of bicuspid aortic valve repair. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;142:1430–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Aicher D, Kunihara T, Abou Issa O, et al. Valve configuration determines long-term results after repair of the bicuspid aortic valve. Circulation. 2011;123:178–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Navarra E, El Khoury G, Glineur D, et al. Effect of annulus dimension and annuloplasty on bicuspid aortic valve repair. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;44:316–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kunihara T, Aicher D, Rodionycheva S, et al. Preoperative aortic root geometry and postoperative cusp configuration primarily determine long-term outcome after valve-preserving aortic root repair. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;143:1389–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Schäfers HJ, Schmied W, Marom G, et al. Cusp height in aortic valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;146:269–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Asano M, Kunihara T, Aicher D, et al. Mid-term results after sinutubular junction remodelling with aortic cusp repair. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;42:1010–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. David TE, Feindel CM, Armstrong S, et al. Replacement of the ascending aorta with reduction of the diameter of the sinotubular junction to treat aortic insufficiency in patients with ascending aortic aneurysm. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;133:414–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Pethig K, Milz A, Hagl C, et al. Aortic valve reimplantation in ascending aortic aneurysm: risk factors for early valve failure. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;73:29–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. David TE, Feindel CM. An aortic-valve sparing operation for patients with aortic incompetence and aneurysm of the ascending aorta. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1992;103:617–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Sarsam MA, Yacoub M. Remodeling of the aortic anulus. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1993;105:435–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Shimizu H, Yozu R. Valve-sparing aortic root replacement. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;17:330–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Morishita K, Murakami G, Koshino T, et al. Aortic root remodeling operation: how do we tailor a tube graft? Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;73:1117–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Fries R, Graeter T, Aicher D, et al. In vitro comparison of aortic valve movement after valve-preserving aortic replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;132:32–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Cabrol C, Cabrol A, Guiraudon G, et al. Treatment of aortic insufficiency by means of aortic annuloplasty. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1966;59:1305–12.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Schneider U, Aicher D, Miura Y, et al. Suture annuloplasty in aortic valve repair. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;101:783–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Lansac E, Di Centa I, Sleilaty G, et al. Remodeling root repair with an external aortic ring annuloplasty. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;153:1033–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Izumoto H, Kawazoe K, Kawase T, et al. Subvalvular circular annuloplasty as a component of aortic valve repair. J Heart Valve Dis. 2002;11:383–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Mukaida M, Kawazoe K, Okabayashi H. Long-term results of aortic valve repair. J JCS Cardiol. 2012;20:65–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Kunihara T. Annular management during aortic valve repair: a systematic review. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;64:63–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Holubec T, Higashigaito K, Belobradek Z, et al. An expansible aortic ring in aortic root remodeling: exact position, pulsatility, effectiveness, and stability in three-dimensional CT study. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017;103:83–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Schäfers HJ, Langer F, Glombitza P, et al. Aortic valve reconstruction in myxomatous degeneration of aortic valves: are fenestrations a risk factor for repair failure? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;139:660–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Trusler GA, Moses CAF, Kid BSL. Repair of ventricular septal defect with aortic insufficiency. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1973;66:394–403.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Marom G, Haj-Ali R, Rosenfeld M, et al. Aortic root numeric model: correlation between intraoperative effective height and diastolic coaptation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;145:303–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Carpentier A. Cardiac valve surgery: the French correction. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1983;86:323–37.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Langer F, Aicher D, Kissinger A, et al. Aortic valve repair using a differentiated surgical strategy. Circulation. 2004;110:II67–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. David TE, Armstrong S. Aortic cusp repair with Gore-tex sutures during aortic valve-sparing operations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;139:1340–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. David TE, Armstrong S, Ivanov J, Webb GD. Aortic valve sparing operations: an update. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;67:1840–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Kunihara T. Technique of aortic valve repair for aortic regurgitation and preoperative echocardiographic assessment. Jpn J Med Ultrasonics. 2018;45:403–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Grinda J-M, Latremouille C, Berrebei AJ, et al. Aortic cusp extension valvuloplasty for rheumatic aortic valve disease: midterm results. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;74:438–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Stephens EH, Hope TA, Kari FA, et al. Greater asymmetric wall shear stress in Sievers’ type 1/LR compared with 0/LAT bicuspid aortic valves after valve-sparing aortic root replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;150:59–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Jermihov PN, Jia L, Sacks MS, et al. Effect of geometry on the leaflet stresses in simulated models of congenital bicuspid aortic valves. Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 2011;2:48–56.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Tolan MJ, Daubeney PE, Slavik Z, et al. Aortic valve repair of congenital stenosis with bovine pericardium. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997;63:465–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Dr. Miura, Shizuoka City Shizuoka Hospital, and Dr. Hama, Saku Central Hospital Advanced Care Center, for sharing intraoperative and echocardiographic findings.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Cardiac Surgery, Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8 Nishishinbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan

    Takashi Kunihara

Authors
  1. Takashi Kunihara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takashi Kunihara.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that there are no conflicts of interest related to this study.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kunihara, T. Aortic valve repair for aortic regurgitation and preoperative echocardiographic assessment. J Med Ultrasonics 46, 51–62 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-018-0903-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-018-0903-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation