Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Role of Animal Translocations in Conserving British Wildlife: An Overview of Recent Work and Prospects for the Future

  • Review
  • Published:
EcoHealth Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We provide an overview of terrestrial animal translocations carried out for conservation purposes in Britain, summarising what has been achieved in recent decades and discussing the issues raised by this approach to conservation. In the last 40 years, at least nine species have been reintroduced following extinction in Britain (or at least one country within Britain), including five birds, one mammal, one amphibian and two invertebrates. Many more species have been translocated within Britain to establish additional populations in order to improve conservation status. We discuss the guidelines and protocols used to assess translocation projects in Britain, notably the IUCN guidelines, most recently revised in 2013. We also discuss the likely use of species translocations in future and suggest that, in our increasingly fragmented landscapes, they will have an important role to play in conservation restoration, especially for animals with limited mobility. Moving species around is a complex undertaking and our understanding of the inherent risks involved, including the risks from disease, has improved significantly in recent years. Conservation translocations should be considered in the context of species recovery targets and high standards should be maintained so that disease risks and other potentially negative impacts are minimised.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bainbridge IP, Evans RJ, Broad RA, Crooke CH, Duffy K, Green RE, Love JA, Mudge GP (2003) Re-introduction of White-tailed Eagles (Haliaeetus albicilla) to Scotland. In: Birds of prey in a changing environment, Thompson DBA, Redpath SM, Fielding AH, Marquiss M, Galbraith, CA (editors), Edinburgh: Scottish Natural Heritage, pp 393-406

    Google Scholar 

  • Batson WG, Gordon IJ, Fletcher DB, Manning AD (2015) Translocation tactics: A framework to support the IUCN guidelines for wildlife translocations and improve the quality of applied methods. Journal of Applied Ecology; DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.12498 [Online July 26, 2015]

    Google Scholar 

  • Bright PW (1993) Habitat fragmentation‐problems and predictions for British mammals. Mammal Review 23(3‐4):101-111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bright P, Morris P, Mitchell-Jones T (2006) The Dormouse conservation handbook (2 nd Edition), Peterborough: English Nature.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown MJF, Sainsbury AW, Vaughan-Higgins RJ, Measures GH, Jones CM, Gammans N (2016) Bringing Back a Healthy Buzz? Invertebrate Parasites and Reintroductions: A Case Study in Bumblebees. EcoHealth. doi:10.1007/s10393-015-1093-5

  • Buckley J, Foster J (2005) Reintroduction strategy for the pool frog Rana lessonae in England. English Nature Research Report 642, Peterborough: English Nature

  • Carter I, Newbery P, Grice P, Hughes J (2008) The role of reintroductions in conserving British birds. British Birds 101:2-25

    Google Scholar 

  • Cushman S A (2006) Effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on amphibians: a review and prospectus. Biological Conservation 128(2):231-240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickie I, Hughes J, Esteban A (2006) Watched like never before: The local economic benefits of spectacular bird species, Sandy: RSPB

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodd CK (2010) Amphibian ecology and conservation: a handbook of techniques, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgar P, Foster J, Baker J (2010) Reptile habitat management handbook, Bournemouth: Amphibian and Reptile Conservation

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewen JG, Armstrong DP, Parker KA, Seddon PJ (editors) (2012) Reintroduction Biology: Integrating Science and Management, Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing

  • Gammans N, Sears J, Lee P, Hyde P, Perkins G, Curson J (2015) The reintroduction of the Short-haired Bumblebee. British Wildlife 26:345-352

    Google Scholar 

  • Hetherington D (2006) The Lynx in Britain’s past, present and future. Ecos 27:66-74

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodder KH, Bullock JM (1997) Translocations of native species in the UK: implications for biodiversity. Journal of Applied Ecology 34:547-565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IUCN (2013) Guidelines for reintroductions and other conservation translocations. https://portals.iucn.org/library/sites/library/files/documents/2013-009.pdf. Accessed July 20 2015

  • Lawton JH, Brotherton PNM, Brown VK, Elphick C, Fitter AH, Forshaw J, Wynne GR (2010) Making Space for Nature: a review of England’s wildlife sites and ecological network. Report to DEFRA

  • Lever C (2009) The Naturalized Animals of Britain and Ireland, London: New Holland

    Google Scholar 

  • Love JA, Ball ME (1979) White-tailed Sea Eagle (Haliaeetus albicilla). Reintroduction to the Isle of Rhum, Scotland 1975-1977. Biological Conservation 16:23-30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madsen T, Ujvari B, Olsson M (2004) Novel genes continue to enhance population growth in adders (Vipera berus). Biological Conservation 120(1):145-147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marren P (2002) Introductions – are we conserving species at the expense of nature? British Wildlife 14:77-82

    Google Scholar 

  • Meek WR, Burman PJ, Nowakowski M, Sparks TH, Burman NJ (2003) Barn Owl release in lowland southern England – a twenty-one year study. Biological Conservation 109(2):271-282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Species Reintroduction Forum (2014) The Scottish code for conservation translocations. http://www.snh.gov.uk/protecting-scotlands-nature/reintroducing-native-species/scct/. Accessed July 20 2015

  • Neff MW, Larson BM (2014) Scientists, managers, and assisted colonization: Four contrasting perspectives entangle science and policy. Biological Conservation 172:1-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pain DJ, Carter I, Sainsbury AW, Shore RF, Eden P, Taggart MA, Konstantinos S, Walker LA, Meharg AA, Raab A (2007) Lead contamination and associated disease in captive and reintroduced red kites Milvus milvus in England. Science of the Total Environment 376: 116-127

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce-Higgins JW, Ausden MA, Beale CM, Oliver TH, Crick HQP (editors) (2015) Research on the assessment of risks and opportunities for species in England as a result of climate change. Natural England Commissioned Reports, Number 175

  • Peeler EJ, Oidtmann BC, Midtlyng PJ, Miossec L, Gozlan RE (2011) Non-native aquatic animals introductions have driven disease emergence in Europe. Biological Invasions 13(6):1291-1303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sainsbury AW, Vaughan‐Higgins RJ (2012) Analyzing disease risks associated with translocations. Conservation Biology 26(3):442-452

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seddon PJ, Armstrong DP, Maloney RF (2007) Developing the science of reintroduction biology. Conservation Biology 21(2):303-312

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seddon PJ, Griffiths CJ, Soorae PS, Armstrong DP (2014) Reversing defaunation: Restoring species in a changing world. Science 345(6195):406-412

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sewell D, Baker JM, Griffiths RA (2015) Population dynamics of Grass Snakes (Natrix natrix) at a site restored for amphibian reintroduction. The Herpetological Journal 25(3):155-161

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart J, Amar A, Sim IMW, Etheridge B, Cameron D, Christie G, Wilson JD (2010) Illegal killing slows population recovery of a re-introduced raptor of high conservation concern – The red kite Milvus milvus. Biological Conservation 143:1278-1286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tallmon DA, Luikart G, Waples RS (2004) The alluring simplicity and complex reality of genetic rescue. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19(9):489-496

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas CD (2011) Translocation of species, climate change, and the end of trying to recreate past ecological communities. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 26(5):216-221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas J, Lewington R (2010) The butterflies of Britain and Ireland, Gillingham: British Wildlife Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  • Toms MP, Crick HQP, Shawyer CR (2001) The status of breeding Barn Owls Tyto alba in the United Kingdom 1995-97. Bird Study 48:23-37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vila C, Sundqvist AK, Flagstad Ø, Seddon J, Kojola I, Casulli A, Ellegren H (2003) Rescue of a severely bottlenecked wolf (Canis lupus) population by a single immigrant. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 270(1510):91-97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whiteley AR, Fitzpatrick SW, Funk WC, Tallmon DA (2015) Genetic rescue to the rescue. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 30(1):42-49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson CJ (2004) Could we live with reintroduced large carnivores in the UK? Mammal Review 34(3):211-232

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to our many colleagues at Natural England, Amphibian and Reptile Conservation and RSPB for useful discussion and debate about species translocations. We particularly thank those who commented on a draft of this paper or provided other useful information including Andy Brown, Jon Curson, Mary Davies, Paul Edgar, Phil Grice, David Heaver, Kat Walsh and Tony Sainsbury. Many of the translocations we have been involved with in recent years have benefitted from a long-term partnership with the Zoological Society of London (ZSL), helping to ensure that projects have been carried out to a high standard. We thank Katie Beckmann, Tim Hopkins, Jenny Jaffe, Fieke Molenaar, Gabriela Peniche, Tony Sainsbury, Justine Shotton and Rebecca Vaughan-Higgins for their involvement and their resulting contribution to the conservation of threatened species in Britain. We also thank the many other organisations and individuals involved in these species translocation Projects.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ian Carter.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Carter, I., Foster, J. & Lock, L. The Role of Animal Translocations in Conserving British Wildlife: An Overview of Recent Work and Prospects for the Future. EcoHealth 14 (Suppl 1), 7–15 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-015-1097-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-015-1097-1

Keywords

Navigation