Abstract
Aim
Socioeconomic status (SES) is one of the most important determinants of health. Subjective social status (SSS) is a popular SES indicator. The objective of this study is to compare the associations between health and various SES indicators in order to examine whether SSS is a proper SES indicator.
Subject and methods
In this 2013 cross-sectional study, 1,995 Tehrani residents were selected through multi-stage random sampling. The questionnaires included items on subjective and objective SES, self-rated health (SRH) and objective health status. The crude and adjusted associations between health and SES indicators were assessed using bivariate and multiple logistic regressions.
Results
The crude associations between SSS and all assessed health outcomes were significant. After adjustment of the wealth index, consumption, education and occupation, the associations between SSS and SRH (OR = 0.69, CI 95 %: 0.55–0.86) and having cardiovascular (OR = 0.73, CI 95 %: 0.58–0.92), musculoskeletal (OR = 0.81, CI 95 %: 0.70–0.94), asthma and other respiratory diseases (OR = 0.71, CI 95 %: 0.54–0.92) still remained significant. The adjusted associations between SSS and having hypertension and diabetes were not significant. SSS had a stronger correlation with the wealth index (Spearman r = 0.42) compared to other SES indicators.
Conclusion
SSS showed a significant association with most of the health outcomes, independent of other SES indicators; therefore, it can be used in health research, though it is not an exact alternative for other objective SES indicators.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adler NE, Epel ES, Castellazzo G, Ickovics JR (2000) Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: preliminary data in healthy white women. Health Psychol 19:586
Banks J, Marmot M, Oldfield Z, Smith JP (2006) Disease and disadvantage in the United States and in England. JAMA 295:2037–2045
Baron-Epel O, Kaplan G (2009) Can subjective and objective socioeconomic status explain minority health disparities in Israel? Soc Sci Med 69:1460–1467
Bayat N, Mohammad K, Majdzadeh R, Etemadi A, Nedjat S (2015) Job classification in health research in Iran: a case of a developing country. J Biostat Epidemiol 1:22–29
De Bruin A (1996) Health interview surveys: towards international harmonization of methods and instruments. WHO Regional Publications, European Series no. 58. ERIC, WHO, Geneva
Demakakos P, Nazroo J, Breeze E, Marmot M (2008) Socioeconomic status and health: the role of subjective social status. Soc Sci Med 67:330–340
Dowd JB, Zajacova A (2007) Does the predictive power of self-rated health for subsequent mortality risk vary by socioeconomic status in the US? Int J Epidemiol 36:1214–1221
Duncan GJ, Daly MC, McDonough P, Williams DR (2002) Optimal indicators of socioeconomic status for health research. Am J Public Health 92:1151–1157
Franzini L, Fernandez-Esquer ME (2006) The association of subjective social status and health in low-income Mexican-origin individuals in Texas. Soc Sci Med 63:788–804
Ghaed SG, Gallo LC (2007) Subjective social status, objective socioeconomic status, and cardiovascular risk in women. Health Psychol 26:668
Gong F, Xu J, Takeuchi DT (2012) Beyond conventional socioeconomic status: examining subjective and objective social status with self-reported health among Asian immigrants. J Behav Med 35:407–419
Grundy E, Holt G (2001) The socioeconomic status of older adults: how should we measure it in studies of health inequalities? J Epidemiol Community Health 55:895–904
Howe LD, Galobardes B, Matijasevich A, Gordon D, Johnston D, Onwujekwe O, Patel R, Webb EA, Lawlor DA, Hargreaves JR (2012) Measuring socio-economic position for epidemiological studies in low-and middle-income countries: a methods of measurement in epidemiology paper. Int J Epidemiol. doi:10.1093/ije/dys037
Hu P, Adler NE, Goldman N, Weinstein M, Seeman TE (2005) Relationship between subjective social status and measures of health in older Taiwanese persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 53:483–488
Jewell NP (2003) Statistics for epidemiology. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL
Miyakawa M, Hanson LLM, Theorell T, Westerlund H (2012) Subjective social status: its determinants and association with health in the Swedish working population (the SLOSH study). Eur J Public Health 22:593–597
Mohammad K, Golestan B, Majdzadeh R, Chaman R, Nedjat S, Karimloo M (2009) Socioeconomic status and obesity relationship in non-menopause women aged 15-49 years in Tehran, Iran. Iran J Public Health 38:84–89
Morasae EK, Forouzan AS, Majdzadeh R, Asadi-Lari M, Noorbala AA, Hosseinpoor AR (2012) Understanding determinants of socioeconomic inequality in mental health in Iran’s capital, Tehran: a concentration index decomposition approach. Int J Equity Health 11:18
Nedjat S, Hosseinpoor AR, Forouzanfar MH, Golestan B, Majdzadeh R (2012) Decomposing socioeconomic inequality in self-rated health in Tehran. J Epidemiol Community Health 66:495–500
Operario D, Adler NE, Williams DR (2004) Subjective social status: reliability and predictive utility for global health. Psychol Health 19:237–246
Sakurai K, Kawakami N, Yamaoka K, Ishikawa H, Hashimoto H (2010) The impact of subjective and objective social status on psychological distress among men and women in Japan. Soc Sci Med 70:1832–1839
Shannon D, Gilbert B (2006) Assessment of socio-economic status in the context of food insecurity: implications for field research. World Health Popul 8:32–42
Singh-Manoux A, Adler NE, Marmot MG (2003) Subjective social status: its determinants and its association with measures of ill-health in the Whitehall II study. Soc Sci Med 56:1321–1333
Singh-Manoux A, Marmot MG, Adler NE (2005) Does subjective social status predict health and change in health status better than objective status? Psychosom Med 67:855–861
Subramanyam MA, Diez-Roux AV, Hickson DA, Sarpong DF, Sims M, Taylor HA Jr, Williams DR, Wyatt SB (2012) Subjective social status and psychosocial and metabolic risk factors for cardiovascular disease among African Americans in the Jackson Heart Study. Soc Sci Med 74:1146–1154
Vyas S, Kumaranayake L (2006) Constructing socio-economic status indices: how to use principal components analysis. Health Policy Plan 21:459–468
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
This study was conducted with the approval of the Tehran University of Medical Science Ethics Committee.
Funding
This project was financially supported by the Vice Chancellor of Research at Tehran University of Medical Sciences (project No. 25621-27-03-93).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baigi, V., Nedjat, S., Fotouhi, A. et al. Subjective social status in association with various health and socioeconomic indicators in Tehran. J Public Health 24, 497–503 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-016-0749-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-016-0749-0