Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Perineal reconstruction with local flaps: technique and results

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Wide excision of perineal lesions, often including the entire anal canal, may be necessary for benign and malignant conditions. Closure of these large defects is challenging, especially when continence is a goal. The aim of this study was to assess our experience with local flap closure of large perineal defects.

Methods

From 1994 to 2009, 20 patients underwent wide perineal and/or anal canal excisions and reconstruction using local flaps. Mean age was 45 years (range 20–65 years), 13 were male, and 8 (40 %) were immunocompromised. Primary indications included anal or perineal squamous cell carcinoma—(n = 12), Buschke-Lowenstein tumor (n = 3), and anal intraepithelial neoplasia (n = 3), hidradenitis, stenosis, ectropion, and traumatic cloaca repair (n = 1 each). Primary procedures included wide local excision of large neoplastic lesions—(n = 15) (mean size 10 cm, range 5–18 cm), abdominoperineal resection (APR) (n = 2), perineoplasty with sphincteroplasty—(n = 1), and others—(n = 2). All were reconstructed with bilateral local flaps (V–Y 18, S 2). Thirteen had complete excision of the anal canal to the anorectal ring preserving the sphincters. Six (30 %) had ostomies; 2 with APR and 4 temporary.

Results

There were no perioperative deaths. Mean hospital stay was 4.2 days. Follow-up averaged 35 months (range 3–87 months) in survivors. Five patients died during follow-up; 2 of complications of acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) and 3 of cancer (2 treated palliatively). Wound dehiscence occurred in 6 (30 %) patients: in 3 cases, this was minor dehiscence and healed quickly; in 3 cases, it was major dehiscence and occurred in the 2 radiation/APR patients and in one patient with advanced AIDS. Radiation was the only significant risk factor (P < .05). Twelve of 14 eligible patients with long-term follow-up and an intact anal canal are fully continent, and 2 are partially continent (1 traumatic cloaca; 1 the same as before surgery).

Conclusion

Local flap reconstruction of the perineum and anal canal is an excellent method of managing large perineal defects. Most heal primarily, even in immunocompromised patients, and continence may be preserved. Local flaps should be avoided in irradiated patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hoffman MS, LaPolla JP, Roberts WS, Fiorica JV, Cavanagh D (1990) Use of local flaps for primary anal reconstruction following perianal resection for neoplasia. Gynecol Oncol 36:348–352

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ricchi E, Fundarò S, Spallanzani A et al (1996) Vertical subcutaneous pedicle flaps for posterior perineal reconstruction. Report of three cases. Dis Colon Rectum 39:353–357

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Murakami K, Tanimura H, Ishimoto K, Yamaue H, Yamade N, Shimamoto T (1996) Reconstruction with bilateral gluteus maximus myocutaneous rotation flap after wide local excision for perianal extramammary Paget’s disease. Report of two cases. Dis Colon Rectum 39:227–231

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hassan I, Horgan AF, Nivatvongs S (2001) V–Y island flaps for repair of large perianal defects. Am J Surg 181:363–365

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sarner JB (1969) Plastic relief of anal stenosis. Dis Colon Rectum 12:277–280

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Peled IJ, Manny J, Wexler MR, Luttwak EM (1984) The triangular island skin flap for treatment of anal ectropion. Dis Colon Rectum 27:33–34

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Caplin DA, Kodner IJ (1986) Repair of anal stricture and mucosal ectropion by simple flap procedures. Dis Colon Rectum 29:92–94

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gingold BS, Arvanitis M (1986) Y–V anoplasty for treatment of anal stricture. Surg Gynecol Obstet 162:241–242

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Rosen L (1986) V–Y advancement for anal ectropion. Dis Colon Rectum 29:596–598

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Pearl RK, Hooks VH 3rd, Abcarian H, Orsay CP, Nelson RL (1990) Island flap anoplasty for the treatment of anal stricture and mucosal ectropion. Dis Colon Rectum 33:581–583

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sentovich SM, Falk PM, Christensen MA, Thorson AG, Latchford GJ, Pitsch RM (1996) Operative results of House advancement anoplasty. Br J Surg 83:1242–1244

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Liberman H, Thorson AG (2000) How I do it. Anal stenosis. Am J Surg 179:325–329

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ferguson JA (1959) Repair of “whitehead deformity” of the anus. Surg Gynecol Obstet 108:115–116

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Nigro ND, Vaitkevicius VK, Considine B Jr (1974) Combined therapy for cancer of the anal canal: a preliminary report. Dis Colon Rectum 17:354–356

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lam DT, Batista O, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD (2001) Staged excision and split-thickness skin graft for circumferential perianal Paget disease. Dis Colon Rectum 44:868–870

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Schlaerth JB, Morrow CP, Nalick RH, Gaddis O Jr (1984) Anal involvement by carcinoma in situ of the perineum in women. Obstet Gynecol 64:406–411

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Seckel BR, Schoetz DJ, Coller JA (1985) Skin grafts for circumferential coverage and perianal wounds. Surg Clin North Am 65:365–371

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Mestrovič T, Cavcič J, Martinac P et al (2003) Reconstruction of skin defects after radical excision of anorectal giant condyloma acuminatum: 6 cases. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 17:541–545

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Amin SN, Tierney GM, Lund JN, Armitage NC (2003) V–Y advancement flap for treatment of fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum 46:540–543

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Martin EG (1944) The plastic use of skin in simple anal stricture, reconstruction of anal lining, pilonidal disease. Tr Am Proct Soc 44:195–200

    Google Scholar 

  21. Khubchandani IT (1985) Mucosal advancement anoplasty. Dis Colon Rectum 28:194–196

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Borges AF (1981) The rhombic flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 67:458–466

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Quaba AA, Sommerlad BC (1987) A square peg into a round hole: a modified rhomboid flap and its clinical application. Br J Plast Surg 40:163–170

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lopez-Rios FL (1990) Rhomboid flap in proctologic reconstruction. Dis Colon Rectum 33:73–77

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Erich JB, Hill JR, Schwartz AW (1960) Use of pedicle flaps of skin for closure of perianal and sacral defects. Dis Colon Rectum 3:481–484

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Jun SH, Choi GS (1999) Anocutaneous advancement flap closure of high fistula in ano. Br J Surg 86:490–492

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Nelson RL, Cintron J, Abcarian H (2000) Dermal island-flap anoplasty for transsphincteric fistula-in-ano: assessment of treatment failures. Dis Colon Rectum 43:681–684

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Sagher U, Krausz MM, Peled IJ (1992) V–Y plasty for perianal reconstruction after resection of tumor. Surg Gynecol Obstet 175:31–32

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Uribe N, Millan M, Flores J, Asencio F, Diaz F, Del Castillo JR (2004) Excision and V–Y plasty reconstruction for giant condyloma acuminatum. Tech Coloproctol 8:99–101

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Oh C, Zinberg J (1982) Anoplasty for anal stricture. Dis Colon Rectum 25:809–810

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Yii NW, Niranjan NS (1996) Lotus petal flaps in vulvo-vaginal reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg 49:547–554

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Warrier SK, Kimble FW, Blomfield P (2004) Refinements in the lotus petal flap repair of the vulvo-perineum. ANZ J Surg 74:684–688

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. McCraw JB, Massey FM, Skanklin KD, Horton CE (1976) Vaginal reconstruction with gracilis myocutaneous flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 58:176–183

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Burke TW, Morris M, Roh MS, Levenback C, Gershenson DM (1995) Perineal reconstruction using single gracilis myocutaneous flaps. Gynecol Oncol 57:221–225

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Solomon MJ, Atkinson K, Quinn MJ, Eyers AA, Glenn DC (1996) Gracilis myocutaneous flap to reconstruct large perineal defects. Int J Colorectal Dis 11:49–51

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Minami RT, Mills R, Pardoe R (1977) Gluteus maximus myocutaneous flaps for repair of pressure sores. Plast Reconstr Surg 60:242–249

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Hurwitz DJ, Swartz WM, Mathes SJ (1981) The gluteal thigh flap: a reliable, sensate flap for the closure of buttock and perineal wounds. Plast Reconstr Surg 68:521–532

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Sasaki K, Nozaki M, Kikutchi Y, Yamaki T, Soejima K (1999) Reconstruction of perianal skin defect using a V–Y advancement of bilateral gluteus maximus musculocutaneous flaps: reconstruction considering anal cleft and anal function. Br J Plast Surg 52:471–475

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Abbas MA (2011) Wide local excision for Buschke-Löwenstein tumor or circumferential carcinoma in situ. Tech Coloproctol 15:313–318

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Trombetta LJ, Place RJ (2001) Giant condyloma acuminatum of the anorectum: trends in epidemiology and management: report of a case and review of the literature. Dis Colon Rectum 44:1878–1886

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington Street, Box 6190, Boston, MA, 02111, USA

    B. A. Orkin

Authors
  1. B. A. Orkin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. A. Orkin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Orkin, B.A. Perineal reconstruction with local flaps: technique and results. Tech Coloproctol 17, 663–670 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-013-0978-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-013-0978-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation