Abstract
A facial pore is an empty funnel-shaped structure filled with cornified cylindrical plugs that can be cosmetically bothersome to some patients. In the previous report, the new unipolar radiofrequency (RF) device with a vacuum showed excellent skin tightening and patient satisfaction with improved pores. This study aims to confirm the treatment’s efficacy with the new unipolar RF device on facial dilated pores by measuring quantitative sebum production differences and doing a histologic examination of pore size. Twelve patients who visited the dermatologic clinic without other underlying inflammatory facial skin diseases were included, regardless of the patient’s age or sex. All patients received five successive treatments at 2-week intervals. We assessed all changes in sebum production levels, melanin index, erythema index before and after treatment, along with overall improvement (reduction of pore size, skin tone, skin texture, and skin laxity). In the five patients who agreed in advance, a biopsy of the pore lesion was taken before and 1 month after the last treatment with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining, Masson’s trichrome (M-T) staining, and Victoria blue staining. We observed a significant reduction of sebum production and melanin index after using the new unipolar RF device with a vacuum (sebum production, p = 0.011; MI, p = 0.004). In evaluating patient satisfaction for four categories, the patients showed a moderate to the excellent improvement of more than 50% in their condition except for skin tones. The average pore size decreased by 41.7% in the histological examination, from 64.98 to 37.86 μm. Additionally, we observed an overall decreased sebaceous gland in the dermis and the proliferation of dermal collagen fiber. The number of elastic bundles in the D-E junction was increased after treatment. The nonablative unipolar RF devices with a vacuum can improve dilated pores with a dual mechanism (collagen regeneration and reduction of sebum production), with much less pain than other RF devices.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cho SB, Kim HS (2016) High-frequency alternating electrical current: selective electromagnetic tissue reaction. Medical Lasers 5(1):1–6
Alexiades-Armenakas M, Dover JS, Arndt KA (2008) Unipolar versus bipolar radiofrequency treatment of rhytides and laxity using a mobile painless delivery method. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine: The Official Journal of the American Society for Laser Medicine and Surgery 40(7):446–453
Ahn GR, Kim JM, Park SJ, Li K, Kim BJ (2020) Selective sebaceous gland electrothermolysis using a single microneedle radiofrequency device for acne patients: a prospective randomized controlled study. Lasers Surg Med 52(5):396–401
Suh DH, Byun EJ, Lee SJ, Song KY, Kim HS (2017) Clinical efficacy and safety evaluation of a novel fractional unipolar radiofrequency device on facial tightening: a preliminary report. J Cosmet Dermatol 16(2):199–204
Lee SJ, Seok J, Jeong SY, Park KY, Li K, Seo SJ (2016) Facial pores: definition, causes, and treatment options. Dermatol Surg 42(3):277–285
Krueger N, Sadick NS (2013) New-generation radiofrequency technology. Cutis 91(1):39–46
Jung JW, Kim WO, Jung HR, Kim SA, Ryoo YW. A face-split study to evaluate the effects of microneedle radiofrequency with Q-switched Nd: YAG laser for the treatment of melasma. 2019.
Kobayashi T, Tamada S (2007) Selective electrothermolysis of the sebaceous glands: treatment of facial seborrhea. Dermatol Surg 33(2):169–177
Lee JW, Kim BJ, Kim MN, Ahn GY, Aso H (2012) Selective sebaceous gland electrothermolysis as a treatment for acne: a prospective pilot study. Int J Dermatol 51(3):339–344
Kwon TR, Choi EJ, Oh CT, Bak DH, Im SI, Ko EJ, Hong HK, Choi YS, Seok J, Choi SY, Ahn GY, Kim BJ (2017) Targeting of sebaceous glands to treat acne by micro-insulated needles with radiofrequency in a rabbit ear model. Lasers Surg Med 49(4):395–401
Ruiz-Esparza J, Gomez JB. Nonablative radiofrequency for active acne vulgaris: the use of deep dermal heat in the treatment of moderate to severe active acne vulgaris (thermotherapy): a report of 22 patients. Dermatol Surg 2003; 29(4):333–339; discussion 339.
Choi J-Y, Hwang SH, Yang J, Lee G-Y (2019) Using a nonablative monopolar radiofrequency laser in the treatment of acne vulgaris. Dermatol Sin 37(2):77
Sakamoto FH, Doukas AG, Farinelli WA, Tannous Z, Shinn M, Benson S, Williams GP, Gubeli JF 3rd, Dylla HF, Anderson RR (2012) Selective photothermolysis to target sebaceous glands: theoretical estimation of parameters and preliminary results using a free electron laser. Lasers Surg Med 44(2):175–183
Elawar A, Dahan S (2018) Non-insulated fractional microneedle radiofrequency treatment with smooth motor insertion for reduction of depressed acne scars, pore size, and skin texture improvement: a preliminary study. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol 11(8):41–44
Alexiades-Armenakas M. Unipolar vs bipolar radiofrequency therapy for skin tightening and wrinkle reduction. 2007. WILEY-LISS DIV JOHN WILEY & SONS INC, 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN, NJ 07030 USA. p 21–21.
Munger BL, Ide C (1988) The structure and function of cutaneous sensory receptors. Arch Histol Cytol 51(1):1–34
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Suh, D.H., Jeong, J.Y., Lee, S.J. et al. Can a radiofrequency device reduce the pore size?. Lasers Med Sci 37, 1203–1208 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-021-03373-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-021-03373-3