Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Quantitative analysis of collagen and capillaries of 3.8-μm laser-induced cutaneous thermal injury and wound healing

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Lasers in Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The biological effects of cutaneous thermal injury and wound healing after 3.8-μm laser radiation were investigated by observing the effects of different radiation doses on in vivo cutaneous tissue. A 3.8-μm laser with a radiation dose that changes from small (5.07) to large (15.74 J/cm2) was used to irradiate mouse skin with the 2 × 4 grid array method. The healing progress of laser-injured spots, pathological morphology (H&E staining), and collagen structure changes (Sirius Red staining) were dynamically observed from one hour to 21 days after laser radiation, and the capillary count and collagen content were quantitatively and comparatively analyzed. When the radiation doses were 5.07, 6.77, 8.21, and 9.42 J/cm2, a white coagulation spot predominantly occurred, and when the radiation doses were 11.09 12.23, 14.13, 15.74 J/cm2, a small injured spot predominantly occurred. One hour after radiation, the collagen structure was obviously damaged. Three to fourteen days after radiation, the hyperplasia and morphology of the collagen in the 5.07 J/cm2 group were significantly better than those in the other dose groups. The number of capillaries in the 5.07 J/cm2 and 6.77 J/cm2 groups was significantly higher than that in the normal group (P < 0.01 or P < 0.05). Twenty-one days after radiation, only the collagen in the 5.07 J/cm2 group was densely arranged, and it was basically close to the normal group level. The collagen content in the 5.07 J/cm2 group was approximately 10.7%, but it was still lower than that in the normal group (with a collagen content of approximately 14.1%). The collagen in the other dose groups was diminished and had not returned to the normal group level. As the dose of the 3.8-μm laser increased, skin thermal injury gradually increased, the full-thickness skin increased, and the collagen content decreased, showing better dose-dependent and time-dependent effect relationships. The increase in capillaries in the early stage of laser radiation and the significant increase in collagen content in the middle and late stages of laser radiation were two important factors that promoted wound healing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yun SH, Kwok SJJ (2017) Light in diagnosis, therapy and surgery. Nat Biomed Eng 1:1–39

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Zeitler E, Wolbarsht ML (1971) Laser characteristics that might be useful in biology. In: Laser applications in medicine and biology. Springer, Boston, pp 1–18

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang J, Shan Q, Ma P, Jiang Y, Chen P, Wen J, Zhou Y, Qian H, Pei X (2004) Differentiation potential of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells into retina in normal and laser-injured rat eye. Sci China Ser C Life Sci 47(3):241–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wu DC, Goldman MP, Wat H, Chan HHL (2020) A systematic review of picosecond laser in dermatology: evidence and recommendations. Lasers Surg Med. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.23244

  5. Kelly A, Pai A, Lertsakdadet B, Choi B, Kelly KM (2020) Microvascular effects of pulsed dye laser in combination with oxymetazoline. Lasers Surg Med 52:17–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sliney DH (1995) Laser safety. Lasers Surg Med 16:215–225

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Barat K (2003) Laser accidents: occurrence and response. Health Phys 84:S93–S95

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Chu EA, Li M, Lazarow FB, Wong BJ (2014) Mid-infrared laser orbital septal tightening: ex vivo dosimetry study and pilot clinical study. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 16(6):425–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fan YW, Sun Y, Chang W, Zhang XR, Tang J, Zhang LW, Liao HE (2018) Bioluminescence imaging and two-photon microscopy-guided laser ablation of GBM decreases tumor burden. Theranostics. 8(15):4072–4085

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Das D, Reed S, Klokkevold PR, Wu BM (2013) A high-throughput comparative characterization of laser-induced soft tissue damage using 3D digital microscopy. Lasers Med Sci 28:657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Haak C, Hannibal J, Paasch U, Anderson R, Haedersdal M (2017) Laser-induced thermal coagulation enhances skin uptake of topically applied compounds. Lasers Surg Med 49:582–591

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Evers M, Ha L, Casper M, Welford D, Kositratna G, Birngruber R, Manstein D (2018) Assessment of skin lesions produced by focused, tunable, mid-infrared chalcogenide laser radiation. Lasers Surg Med 50:961–972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Spiegel J, Hansen C, Treede R-D (2000) Clinical evaluation criteria for the assessment of impaired pain sensitivity by thuliumlaser evoked potentials. Clin Neurophysiol 111(4):725–735

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Apel C, Meister J, Ioana RS, Franzen R, Hering P, Gutknecht N (2002) The ablation threshold of Er:YAG and Er: YSGG laser radiation in dental enamel. Lasers Med Sci 17(4):246–252

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lapidoth M, Yagima, Odo ME, Odo LM (2008) Novel use of erbium: YAG (2,940-nm) laser for fractional ablative photothermolysis in the treatment of photodamaged facial skin: a pilot study. Dermatol Surg 34(8):1048–1053

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ansari MA, Erfanzadeh M, Mohajerani E (2013) Mechanisms of laser-tissue interaction: II. Tissue thermal properties. J Lasers Med Sci 4(3):99–106

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Chua D, Chan ASY, Mehta JS, Chee SP, Rosman M (2019) Corneal inlay damage after cosmetic laser treatment of the eyelid with long-pulsed Nd:YAG laser. JAMA Ophthalmol. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.4126

  18. Baum CL, Arpey CJ (2005) Normal cutaneous wound healing: clinical correlation with cellular and molecular events. Dermatol Surg 31:674–686 discussion 686

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Fan YW, Ma Q, Liang J, Lu YX, Ni B, Luo ZK, Cui YF, Kang HX (2019) Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of recovery process of a 1 064 nm laser on laser-induced skin injury: in vivo experimental research. Laser Phys Lett 16:115604

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang YM, Ruan J, Xiao R, Zhang Q, Huang YS (2013) Comparative study of 1,064-nm laser-induced skin burn and thermal skin burn. Cell Biochem Biophys 67(3):1005–1014

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sanders DL, Reinisch L (2000) Wound healing and collagen thermal damage in 7.5-μsec pulsed CO2 laser skin incisions. Lasers Med Sci 26(1):22–32

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Vincelette RL, Noojin GD, Harbert CA, Schuster KJ, Shingledecker AD, Stolarski D, Kumru SS, Oliver JW (2014) Porcine skin damage thresholds for 0.6 to 9.5 cm beam diameters from 1070-nm continuous-wave infrared laser radiation. J Biomed Opt 19(3):035007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Oliver JW, Kumru SS, Thomas RJ, Stolarski D, Noojin G, Hodnett H, Harbert C, Schuster K, Foltz M, Cain C, Noojin I, Finkeldei C, Buffington G (2010) Infrared skin damage thresholds from 1940-nm continuous-wave laser exposures. J Biomed Opt 15(6):065008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Chen B, Thomsen SL, Thomas RJ, Welch A (2006) Modeling thermal damage in skin from 2000-nm laser irradiation. J Biomed Opt 11(6):064028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Boretsky AR, Clary JE, Noojin GD, and Rockwell BA (2019) Mid-infrared femtosecond laser damage thresholds in skin. Proc. SPIE 10876, Optical Interactions with Tissue and Cells XXX, 108760J

  26. Liu H, Dang Y, Wang Z, Chai X, Ren Q (2008) Laser induced collagen remodeling: a comparative study in vivo on mouse model. Lasers Surg Med 40(1):13–19

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Jowett N, Wöllmer W, Mlynarek AM, Wiseman P, Segal B, Franjic K, Miller RJD (2013) Heat generation during ablation of porcine skin with erbium:YAG laser vs a novel picosecond infrared laser. JAMA Otolaryngol–Head Neck Surg 139(8):828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Johnson TE, Roy MJ (2016) Cutaneous sensation threshold for 3.8 μm radiation from a short duration pulsed laser on the calves of human subjects: a pilot study. J Laser Appl 18:334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Pazyar N, Yaghoobi R, Rafiee E, Mehrabian A, Feily A (2014) Skin wound healing and phytomedicine: a review. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 27:303–310

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Fan YW, Ma Q, Xin S, Peng RY, Kang HX (2020) Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of supercontinuum laser-induced cutaneous thermal injuries and their repair with OCT images. Lasers Surg Med. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.23287

  31. Alexander JW (1983) The influence of hair-removal methods on wound infections. Arch Surg 118(3):347

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was partially funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (No. 81901907, Dr. Fan) and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2018M643846 and No. 2019T120982, Dr. Fan).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hongxiang Kang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no competing interest exists.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ma, Q., Fan, Y., Luo, Z. et al. Quantitative analysis of collagen and capillaries of 3.8-μm laser-induced cutaneous thermal injury and wound healing. Lasers Med Sci 36, 1469–1477 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-020-03193-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-020-03193-x

Keywords

Navigation