Skip to main content
Log in

Use of pulsed field gel electrophoresis to determine the source of microbial contamination of central venous catheters

  • Note
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Microorganisms detected in situ on the distal tip of central venous catheters (CVC) within 90 min of insertion were investigated using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis to analyse genomic fragments obtained with theSmaI restriction enzyme. Thirty patients received a triple lumen CVC, which was inserted directly through the skin using the Seldinger technique. In a further 30 patients a triple lumen CVC was inserted through a Swan sheath, thereby avoiding direct contact of the CVC with the skin. Staphylococci were isolated from the distal tips of the catheters in 6 patients (5 who had the CVC inserted directly through the skin and 1 who had the CVC inserted via a Swan sheath.) Twenty-three staphylococcal isolates were also isolated from the insertion equipment and the skin swabs surrounding the insertion site of these six patients. All the isolates were genotyped. In one of the patients the organisms isolated from the skin were identical to those on the CVC tip. In two further patients similar organisms were isolated from the insertion equipment and the patients' skin. These results, in addition to the reduced colonisation rates observed when catheters were introduced through a Swan sheath, support the hypothesis that microorganisms from the skin are impacted onto the CVC tip and the CVC insertion equipment at catheter insertion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Archer GL:Staphylococcus epidermidis and other coagulase-negative staphylococci. In: Mandell GL, Bennett JE (eds) Principles of infectious diseases. John Wiley, New York, (1990) pp 1511–1518

    Google Scholar 

  2. Douard MC, Clementi E, Arlet G: Negative catheter tip cultures and diagnosis of catheter related bacteraemia. Nutrition (1994) 10:397–404

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Maki DG, Stolz SS, Wheeler S, Mermel LA: A prospective randomised trial of gauze and two polyurethane dressings for site care of pulmonary artery catheters: implications for catheter management. Critical Care Medicine (1994) 22:1729–1737

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Elliott TSJ: Intra-vascular-device infections. Journal of Medical Microbiology (1988) 27:161–167

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Elliott TSJ: Line associated bacteraemias. Communicable Diseases Report (1993) 3:91–95

    Google Scholar 

  6. Moss HA, Elliott TSJ: The cost of infections related to central venous catheters designed for long-term use. British Journal of Medical Microbiology (1997) 11:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sitges-Serra A, Puig P, Linares J, Perez JL, Farrero N, Jaurrieta E, Garau J: Hub colonisation as the initial step in an outbreak of catheter-related sepsis due to a coagulase-negative staphylococci during parenteral nutrition. Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (1984) 8:668–672

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Elliott TSJ, Moss HA, Tebbs SE, Wilson IC, Bonser RS, Graham TR, Burke LP, Faroqui MH: A novel approach to investigate the source of microbial contamination of central venous catheters. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases (1997) 16:210–213

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mermel LA, McCormick RD, Springman SR, Maki DG: The pathogenesis and epidemiology of catheter related infections with pulmonary artery Swan Ganz catheters: a prospective study utilizing molecular subtyping. American Journal of Med'icine (1997) Supplement 3B:197

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tan TQ, Musser JM, Shulman RJ: Molecular epidemiology of coagulase negative staphylococcus blood isolates from neonates with persistent bacteraemia and children with central venous catheter infections. Journal of Infectious Diseases (1994) 169:1393–1397

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lina B, Vandenesch F, Etienne J, Kreiswirth B, Fleurette J: Comparison of coagulase-negative staphylococci by pulsedfield gel electrophoresis. FEMS Microbiology Letters (1992) 92:133–138

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lina B, Forey F, Togaud JD, Fleurette J: Chronic bacteraemia due toStaphylococcus epidermidis after bone marrow transplantation. Journal of Medical Microbiology (1995) 42:156–160

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Linares, J, Dominguez MA, Martin R: Current laboratory techniques in the diagnosis of catheter related infections. Nutrition (1997) 13 Supplement:10–14

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zaidi AKM, Harrell LJ, Rost JR, Relier LB: Assessment of similarity among coagulase-negative staphylococci from sequential blood cultures of neonates and children by pulsedfield gel electrophoresis. Journal of Infectious Diseases (1996) 174:1010–1014

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tenover FC, Arbeit RD, Goering RV, Mickelsen PA, Murray BE, Persing DH, Swaminathan B: Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed field gel electrophoresis:criteria for bacterial strain typing. Journal of Clinical Microbiology (1995) 33:2233–2239

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tebbs SE, Elliott TSJ: A novel antimicrobial central venous catheter impregnated with benzalkonium chloride. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (1993) 31:261–271

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu WK, Tebbs SE, Byrne PO, Elliott TSJ: The effects of electric current on bacteria colonising intravenous catheters. Journal of Infection (1993) 27:261–269

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Livesley, M.A., Tebbs, S.E., Moss, H.A. et al. Use of pulsed field gel electrophoresis to determine the source of microbial contamination of central venous catheters. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 17, 108–112 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01682166

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01682166

Key words

Navigation