Skip to main content
Log in

Concomitant emphysema might increase the false-negative rate of urinary antigen tests in patients with pneumococcal pneumonia: results from a retrospective study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The urinary antigen test (UAT) is a rapid diagnostic method for pneumococcal pneumonia, but the high false-negative rate of 30% may affect its reliability. To maximize the utility of UAT, it is necessary to investigate the patient factors affecting UAT results. However, there is no report elucidating the association between its utility and pre-existing lung abnormalities. We retrospectively reviewed 388 patients with pneumococcal pneumonia confirmed by blood and/or sputum culture tests. Finally, 94 of 388 patients who had the results of UAT and computed tomography scans were enrolled to evaluate the association between the utility of UAT and patient factors including pulmonary emphysema and fibrosis. The overall positive rate of UAT was 69.1%. The positive rates of UAT in the patients with emphysema were significantly lower than those in individuals without emphysema (33.3% and 77.6%, p < 0.001). Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that the presence of emphysema was associated with a low positive rate (odds ratio 6.944, 95% confidence interval 2.268–21.231). Multivariate logistic analysis showed that the presence of emphysema and lower levels of serum blood urea nitrogen (BUN) were significantly and independently associated with a low positive rate. The combination of emphysema and BUN can potentially stratify the positive rate of UAT in patients with pneumococcal pneumonia. Patients with pneumococcal pneumonia and emphysema have a lower positive rate of UAT. Additionally, the combination of emphysema and serum BUN value may be useful to evaluate the reliability of the negative results of pneumococcal UAT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets during and/or analyzed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. File TM (2003) Community-acquired pneumonia. Lancet (London, England) 362(9400):1991–2001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dominguez J, Gali N, Blanco S, Pedroso P, Prat C, Matas L, Ausina V (2001) Detection of Streptococcus pneumoniae antigen by a rapid immunochromatographic assay in urine samples. Chest 119(1):243–249

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Molinos L, Zalacain R, Menendez R, Reyes S, Capelastegui A, Cilloniz C, Rajas O, Borderias L, Martin-Villasclaras JJ, Bello S, Alfageme I, Rodriguez de Castro F, Rello J, Ruiz-Manzano J, Gabarrus A, Musher DM, Torres A (2015) Sensitivity, specificity, and positivity predictors of the pneumococcal urinary antigen test in community-acquired pneumonia. Annals of the American Thoracic Soc 12(10):1482–1489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sordé R, Falcó V, Lowak M, Domingo E, Ferrer A, Burgos J, Puig M, Cabral E, Len O, Pahissa A (2011) Current and potential usefulness of pneumococcal urinary antigen detection in hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia to guide antimicrobial therapy. Arch Intern Med 171(2):166–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Murdoch DR, Laing RT, Mills GD, Karalus NC, Town GI, Mirrett S, Reller LB (2001) Evaluation of a rapid immunochromatographic test for detection of Streptococcus pneumoniae antigen in urine samples from adults with community-acquired pneumonia. J Clin Microbiol 39(10):3495–3498

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gutierrez F, Masia M, Rodriguez JC, Ayelo A, Soldan B, Cebrian L, Mirete C, Royo G, Hidalgo AM (2003) Evaluation of the immunochromatographic Binax NOW assay for detection of Streptococcus pneumoniae urinary antigen in a prospective study of community-acquired pneumonia in Spain. Clin Infect Dis 36(3):286–292

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dusemund F, Chronis J, Baty F, Albrich WC, Brutsche MH (2014) The outcome of community-acquired pneumonia in patients with chronic lung disease: a case-control study. Swiss Med Wkly 144:w14013

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ishiguro T, Takayanagi N, Yamaguchi S, Yamakawa H, Nakamoto K, Takaku Y, Miyahara Y, Kagiyama N, Kurashima K, Yanagisawa T, Sugita Y (2013) Etiology and factors contributing to the severity and mortality of community-acquired pneumonia. Internal Med (Tokyo, Japan) 52(3):317–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Metlay JP, Waterer GW, Long AC, Anzueto A, Brozek J, Crothers K, Cooley LA, Dean NC, Fine MJ, Flanders SA, Griffin MR, Metersky ML, Musher DM, Restrepo MI, Whitney CG (2019) Diagnosis and treatment of adults with community-acquired pneumonia. An official clinical practice guideline of the American Thoracic Society and Infectious Diseases Society of America. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 200(7):e45–e67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fine MJ, Auble TE, Yealy DM, Hanusa BH, Weissfeld LA, Singer DE, Coley CM, Marrie TJ, Kapoor WN (1997) A prediction rule to identify low-risk patients with community-acquired pneumonia. N Engl J Med 336(4):243–250

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lim WS, van der Eerden MM, Laing R, Boersma WG, Karalus N, Town GI, Lewis SA, Macfarlane JT (2003) Defining community acquired pneumonia severity on presentation to hospital: an international derivation and validation study. Thorax 58(5):377–382

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kanda Y (2013) Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software 'EZR' for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant 48(3):452–458

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Watanabe H, Uruma T, Tazaki G, Kikuchi R, Tsuji T, Itoh M (2015) Clinical factors associated with negative urinary antigen tests implemented for the diagnosis of community-acquired pneumococcal pneumonia in adult patients. Med Princ Pract 24(2):189–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sakao S, Voelkel NF, Tatsumi K (2014) The vascular bed in COPD: pulmonary hypertension and pulmonary vascular alterations. Eur Respir Rev 23(133):350–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Andreo F, Ruiz-Manzano J, Prat C, Lores L, Blanco S, Malet A, Gallardo X, Dominguez J (2010) Utility of pneumococcal urinary antigen detection in diagnosing exacerbations in COPD patients. Respir Med 104(3):397–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jover F, Cuadrado JM, Andreu L, Martinez S, Canizares R, de la Tabla VO, Martin C, Roig P, Merino J (2008) A comparative study of bacteremic and non-bacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia. Eur J Intern Med 19(1):15–21

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Camou F, Issa N, Bessede E, Mourissoux G, Guisset O (2015) Usefulness of pneumococcal antigen urinary testing in the intensive care unit? Med Mal Infect 45(8):318–323

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Said MA, Johnson HL, Nonyane BA, Deloria-Knoll M, O'Brien KL, Andreo F, Beovic B, Blanco S, Boersma WG, Boulware DR, Butler JC, Carratala J, Chang FY, Charles PG, Diaz AA, Dominguez J, Ehara N, Endeman H, Falco V, Falguera M, Fukushima K, Garcia-Vidal C, Genne D, Guchev IA, Gutierrez F, Hernes SS, Hoepelman AI, Hohenthal U, Johansson N, Kolek V, Kozlov RS, Lauderdale TL, Marekovic I, Masia M, Matta MA, Miro O, Murdoch DR, Nuermberger E, Paolini R, Perello R, Snijders D, Plecko V, Sorde R, Stralin K, van der Eerden MM, Vila-Corcoles A, Watt JP (2013) Estimating the burden of pneumococcal pneumonia among adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic techniques. PLoS One 8(4):e60273

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Smith MD, Derrington P, Evans R, Creek M, Morris R, Dance DA, Cartwright K (2003) Rapid diagnosis of bacteremic pneumococcal infections in adults by using the Binax NOW Streptococcus pneumoniae urinary antigen test: a prospective, controlled clinical evaluation. J Clin Microbiol 41(7):2810–2813

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception, material preparation, and data collection. Statistical analysis was performed by Erika Kobayashi and Kakuhiro Yamaguchi, and the first draft of the manuscript was written by Erika Kobayashi and Kakuhiro Yamaguchi. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kakuhiro Yamaguchi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Hiroshima University Hospital (No. E1837).

Consent to participate

To obtain consent of the patients, the opt-out method was used.

Consent for publication

To obtain consent of the patients, the opt-out method was used.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

ESM 1

(DOCX 2836 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kobayashi, E., Yamaguchi, K., Nagaoka, R. et al. Concomitant emphysema might increase the false-negative rate of urinary antigen tests in patients with pneumococcal pneumonia: results from a retrospective study. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 40, 871–877 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-020-04095-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-020-04095-0

Keywords

Navigation