Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The economic burden of rheumatoid arthritis: beyond health care costs

  • Published:
Clinical Rheumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) not only causes significant morbidity, but also leads to substantial losses in terms of productivity that have a negative impact on the individual and the society. In countries, such as Canada, the US, and the UK, it is known that the costs to the economy in terms of sick leave and work-related disability run into billions of dollars. However, putting an accurate figure on these losses is not entirely straightforward. Most health-related studies use the “human capital” approach, which treats human beings as assets. A figure for lost productivity is calculated by multiplying hours lost by the hourly wage rate. It is a method that is not without its critics because of its emphasis on earning power, which discriminates against non-earners. Another method is the “friction-cost” approach, whereby absenteeism is only recorded if the missed work requires extra hours undertaken, either by the employee himself, or by the others. A third method is the “willingness-to-pay” approach which values life according to an individual's preference to avoid illness with an imputed monetary valuation on the various health outcomes being considered. A number of studies have shown that biologic RA treatments provide productivity benefits in terms of maintaining employment, as well as reducing absenteeism and presenteeism. Going forward, an approach recently adopted by the present authors with encouraging preliminary results, the Valuation of Lost Productivity, takes into account a wide range of factors to provide a measure of productivity that is as accurate as possible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kvien TK (2004) Epidemiology and burden of illness of rheumatoid arthritis. Pharmacoeconomics 22:1–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. World Health Organization (2009) Chronic rheumatic conditions. http://www.who.int/chp/topics/rheumatic/en/. Accessed July 2009

  3. Lundkvist J, Kastang F, Kobelt G (2008) The burden of rheumatoid arthritis and access to treatment: health burden and costs. Eur J Health Econ 8:S49–S60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lee P (1994) The economic impact of musculoskeletal disorders. Qual Life Res 3:S85–S91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hunsche E, Chancellor JV, Bruce N (2001) The burden of arthritis and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory treatment. A European literature review. Pharmacoeconomics 19:1–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Health Canada (2003) Arthritis in Canada: An Ongoing Challenge. Cat. # H39-4/14-2003E

  7. CDC (2007) National and state medical expenditures and lost earnings attributable to arthritis and other rheumatic conditions – United States, 2003. MMWR 56:4–7

    Google Scholar 

  8. National Audit Office (2009) Services for people with rheumatoid arthritis. Report by the comptroller and auditor general, HC 823 session 2008–2009. National Audit Office, 15 July 2009

  9. Johannesson M (1996) The willingness to pay for health changes, the human-capital approach and the external costs. Health Policy 36:231–244

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Berger ML, Murray JF, Xu J, Pauly M (2001) Alternative valuations of work loss and productivity. J Occup Environ Med 43:18–24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pauly MV, Nicholson S, Xu J, Polsky D, Danzon PM (2002) A general model of the impact of absenteeism on employers and employees. Health Econ 11:221–231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nicholson S, Pauly MV, Polsky D, Sharda C, Szrek H, Berger ML (2006) Measuring the effects of work loss on productivity with team production. Health Econ 15:111–123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pauly MV, Nicholson S, Polsky D, Berger ML, Sharda C (2008) Valuing reductions in on-the-job illness: ‘presenteeism’ from managerial and economic perspectives. Health Econ 17:469–485

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Koopmanschap MA, Rutten FF, van Ineveld BM, van Roijen L (1995) The friction cost method for measuring indirect costs of disease. J Health Econ 14:171–189

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Jacob-Tacken KH, Koopmanschap MA, Meerding WJ, Severens JL (2005) Correcting for compensating mechanisms related to productivity costs in economic evaluations of health care programmes. Health Econ 14:435–443

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Olsen JA, Smith RD (2001) Theory versus practice: a review of ‘willingness-to-pay’ in health and health care. Health Econ 10:39–52

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang W, Bansbank N, Anis AH. Measuring and valuing productivity loss due to poor health: a review. Soc Sci Med (in press)

  18. Clarke AE, Zowall H, Levinton C et al (1997) Direct and indirect medical costs incurred by Canadian patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a 12 year study. J Rheumatol 24:1051–1060

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Merkesdal S, Ruof J, Schoffski O, Bernitt K, Zeidler H, Mau W (2001) Indirect medical costs in early rheumatoid arthritis: composition of and changes in indirect costs within the first three years of disease. Arthritis Rheum 44:528–534

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Yelin E (1996) The costs of rheumatoid arthritis: absolute, incremental, and marginal estimates. J Rheumatol Suppl 44:47–51

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Yelin E, Cisternas M, Pasta D, Trupin L (2003) Direct and indirect costs of musculoskeletal conditions in 1997: Total and incremental estimates. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lerner D, Reed JI, Massarotti E, Wester LM, Burke TA (2002) The Work Limitations Questionnaire’s validity and reliability among patients with osteoarthritis. J Clin Epidemiol 55:197–208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Maetzel A, Li LC, Pencharz J, Tomlinson G, Bombardier C, Community Hypertension and Arthritis Project Study Team (2004) The economic burden associated with osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, and hypertension: a comparative study. Ann Rheum Dis 63:395–401

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Stewart WF, Ricci JA, Chee E, Morganstein D, Lipton R (2003) Lost productive time and cost due to common pain conditions in the US workforce. JAMA 290:2443–2454

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Li X, Gignac MA, Anis AH (2006) The indirect costs of arthritis resulting from unemployment, reduced performance, and occupational changes while at work. Med Care 44:304–310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang W, Koehoorn M, Anis AH (2010) Work productivity among employed Canadians with arthritis. J Occup Environ Med 52:872–877

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gignac MA, Badley EM, Lacaille D, Cott CC, Adam P, Anis AH (2004) Managing arthritis and employment: making arthritis-related work changes as a means of adaptation. Arthritis Rheum 51:909–916

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Gabriel SE, Crowson CS, Campion ME, O’Fallon WM (1997) Indirect and nonmedical costs among people with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis compared with nonarthritic controls. J Rheumatol 24:43–48

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Yelin E, Henke C, Epstein W (1987) The work dynamics of the person with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 30:507–512

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Yelin E, Sonneborn D, Trupin L (2000) The prevalence and impact of accommodations on the employment of persons 51–61 years of age with musculoskeletal conditions. Arthritis Care Res 13:168–176

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Reisine S, Fifield J, Walsh SJ, Feinn R (2001) Factors associated with continued employment among patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a survival model. J Rheumatol 28:2400–2408

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Yelin E, Trupin L, Katz P, Lubeck D, Rush S, Wanke L (2003) Association between etanercept use and employment outcomes among patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 48:3046–3054

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Bejarano V, Quinn MA, Conaghan PG et al (2007) Improved work stability and reduced job loss with adalimumab plus methotrexate in early rheumatoid arthritis: results of the Prevention Of Work Disability (PROWD) Study. Ann Rheum Dis 66(Suppl II):176

    Google Scholar 

  34. Smolen JS, Han C, van der Heijde D et al (2006) Infliximab treatment maintains employability in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 54:716–722

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Augustsson J, Neovius M, Cullinane-Carli C, Eksborg S, van Vollenhoven RF (2010) Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with TNF-antagonists increase their participation in the work-force—potential for significant long-term indirect cost gains. Data from a population-based registry. Ann Rheum Dis 69:126–131

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. van den Hout WB, Goekoop-Ruiterman YP, Allaart CF et al (2009) Cost-utility analysis of treatment strategies in patients with recent-onset rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 61:291–299

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Anis A, Zhang W, Emery P et al (2009) The effect of etanercept on work productivity in patients with early active rheumatoid arthritis: results from the COMET study. Rheumatology 8:1283–1289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Zhang W, Bansbank N, Guh D et al (2008) Short-term influence of adalimumab on work productivity outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 35:1729–1736

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Loeppke R, Hymel PA, Lofland JH et al (2003) Health-related workplace productivity measurement: general and migraine-specific recommendations from the ACOEM Expert Panel. J Occup Environ Med 45:349–359

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Prasad M, Wahlqvist P, Shikiar R, Shih YC (2004) A review of self-report instruments measuring health-related work productivity: a patient-reported outcomes perspective. Pharmacoeconomics 22:225–244

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Lofland JH, Pizzi L, Frick KD (2004) A review of health-related workplace productivity loss instruments. Pharmacoeconomics 22:165–184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Mattke S, Balakrishnan A, Bergamo G, Newberry SJ (2007) A review of methods to measure health-related productivity loss. Am J Manag Care 13:211–217

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Escorpizo R, Bombardier C, Boonen A et al (2007) Worker productivity outcome measures in arthritis. J Rheumatol 34:1372–1380

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Zhang W, Gignac MAM, Beaton D, Tang K, Anis AH, On behalf of the Canadian Arthritis Network Work Productivity Group (2010) Productivity loss due to presenteeism among patients with arthritis: estimates from 4 instruments. J Rheumatol 37:1805–1814

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Zhang W, Bansback N, Kiely P, Williams R, Walsh D, Young A, Anis AH (2010) Measuring work time loss among patients with rheumatoid arthritis: validating the valuation of lost productivity (VOLP) questionnaire. Ann Rheum Dis 69(Suppl3):467

    Google Scholar 

  46. Kennedy I (2009) Appraising the value of innovation and other benefits—a short study for NICE. NICE, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

WZ is a recipient of a Canadian Institutes of Health Research Doctoral Research Award in the Area of Public Health Research and a Canadian Arthritis Network Graduate Award.

Conflict of interest

The content of this article is the sole responsibility of the authors. Medical writing assistance for the preparation of this article was provided by Synergy who received financial support from Pfizer. A. Anis has received honoraria from Abbott, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, and Schering for consulting, and has received research support from Abbott and Pfizer. W. Zhang has no financial relationship with Pfizer or any other pharmaceutical company.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aslam H. Anis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, W., Anis, A.H. The economic burden of rheumatoid arthritis: beyond health care costs. Clin Rheumatol 30 (Suppl 1), 25–32 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-010-1637-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-010-1637-6

Keywords

Navigation