Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Validation of a real-time PCR assay for detection of swinepox virus

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
Archives of Virology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Swine are the only known hosts of swinepox virus (SWPV), the sole member of the genus Suipoxvirus, family Poxviridae. Rapid diagnosis is recommended for appropriate interventions because of the high morbidity associated with this virus. This study describes a real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) assay for rapid detection and quantification of SWPV. The detection limit, repeatability, reproducibility, and specificity of this assay were determined. The efficiency was 96%, and the R2 value was 0.996. The detection limit was 1 fg or 10−0.5 TCID50/50 μL. Tests showed that the greatest source of error in the SWPV qPCR assay was variation between analysts rather than different qPCR kits or equipment. All nucleic acids from other viruses or samples collected from swine were negative in the specificity test. qPCR for SWPV is a new method with tested variables that allows main sources of error in laboratory diagnosis and viral quantification to be identified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Afonso CL, Tulman ER, Lu Z, Zsak L, Osorio FA, Balinsky C, Kutish GF, Rock DL (2002) The genome of swinepox virus. J Virol 76(2):783–790

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Riyesh T, Barua S, Kumar N et al (2016) Isolation and genetic characterization of swinepox virus from pigs in India. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis 46:60–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Medaglia ML, Pereira Ade C, Freitas TR, Damaso CR (2011) Swinepox virus outbreak, Brazil, 2011. Emerg Infect Dis 17(10):1976–1978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Olinda RG, Maia LA, Cargnelutti JF, Gois RCS, Batista Jael S, Dantas AFM, Flores EF, Riet-Correa F (2016) Swinepox dermatitis in backyard pigs in Northeastern Brazil. Pesqui Vet Bras 36(6):468–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mech P, Bora DP, Neher S, Barman NN, Borah P, Tamuly S, Dutta LJ, Das SK (2018) Identification of swinepox virus from natural outbreaks in pig population of Assam. Virus Dis 29(3):395–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lin HX, Huang DY, Wang Y, Lu CP, Fan HJ (2011) A novel vaccine against Streptococcus equi ssp. zooepidemicus infections: the recombinant swinepox virus expressing M-like protein. Vaccine 29(40):7027–7034

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lin HX, Ma Z, Fan HJ, Lu CP (2012) Construction and immunogenicity of recombinant swinepox virus expressing capsid protein of PCV2. Vaccine 30(44):6307–6313

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lin H, Ma Z, Hou X, Chen L, Fan H (2017) Construction and immunogenicity of a recombinant swinepox virus expressing a multi-epitope peptide for porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus. Sci Rep 7:43990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Untergasser A, Nijveen H, Rao X, Bisseling T, Geurts R, Leunissen JA (2007) Primer3Plus, an enhanced web interface to Primer3. Nucleic Acids Res. 35(Web Server issue):W71–W74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nonaka CKV, Fonseca Junior AA, Guedes EO, D’Ambros RM, Lima GK, Camargos MF, Heinemann MB (2017) Different methods of real-time PCR for detection of pseudorabies virus. Ciência Rural 47(3):e20160342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Laguardia-Nascimento M, Sales ÉB, Gasparini MR, de Souza NM, da Silva JA, Souza GG, Carani FR, Dos Santos AF, Rivetti Júnior AV, Camargos MF, Fonseca Júnior AA (2016) Detection of multiple viral infections in cattle and buffalo with suspected vesicular disease in Brazil. J Vet Diagn Investig 28(4):377–381

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Laguardia-Nascimento M, de Oliveira AP, Fernandes FR, Junior Rivetti AV, Camargos MF, Fonseca Júnior AA (2017) Detection of pseudocowpox virus in water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) with vesicular disease in the state of São Paulo, Brazil, in 2016. Vet Q 37(1):16–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dias NL, Fonseca Júnior AA, Oliveira AM et al (2014) Validation of a real time PCR for Classical Swine Fever diagnosis. Vet Med Int 10:e171235

    Google Scholar 

  14. Vandemeulebrouckea E, de Clercqb K, van Der Stedec Y, Vandenbusschea F (2010) A proposed validation method for automated nucleic acid extraction and RT-qPCR analysis: An example using Bluetongue virus. J Virol Methods 165:76–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bustin S, Huggett J (2017) qPCR primer design revisited. Biomol Detect Quantif 14:9–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bustin S, Nolan T (2017) Talking the talk, but not walking the walk: RT-qPCR as a paradigm for the lack of reproducibility in molecular research. Eur J Clin Investig 47(10):756–774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Roux V, Raoult D (1999) Body lice as tools for diagnosis and surveillance of reemerging diseases. J Clin Microbiol 37(3):596–599

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Buzard GS, Baker D, Wolcott MJ, Norwood DA, Dauphin LA (2012) Multi-platform comparison of ten commercial master mixes for probe-based real-time polymerase chain reaction detection of bioterrorism threat agents for surge preparedness. Forensic Sci Int 223(1–3):292–297

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Dijkstra JR, van Kempen LC, Nagtegaal ID, Bustin SA (2014) Critical appraisal of quantitative PCR results in colorectal cancer research: can we rely on published qPCR results? Mol Oncol 8(4):813–818

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antônio Augusto Fonseca Júnior.

Additional information

Handling Editor: William G. Dundon.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Souza, F.A., dos Santos Júnior, E.M., Laguardia-Nascimento, M. et al. Validation of a real-time PCR assay for detection of swinepox virus. Arch Virol 164, 3059–3063 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-019-04403-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-019-04403-w

Navigation