Abstract
Background
Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a neuromodulatory technique used to relieve chronic pain. Previous instances of malicious remote control of implantable medical devices, including insulin delivery pumps and implantable cardiac defibrillators, have been documented. Though no cases of neuromodulatory hacking have been recorded outside of the academic setting, an understanding of SCS technology and the possible consequences of manipulation is important in promoting safety.
Methods
We review the components and implantation protocol of a SCS system, the functionality and technological specifications for SCS systems in the global market based on their device manuals, and patient- and clinician-specific adjustable factors. Furthermore, we assess documented instances of implantable medical device hacking and speculate on the potential harms of targeting SCS systems.
Results
SCS systems from Abbott Laboratories, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and Nevro have unique functionality and technological specifications. Six parameters in device control can potentially be targeted and elicit various harms, including loss of therapeutic effect, accelerated battery drainage, paresthesia in unintended locations, muscle weakness or dysfunction, tissue burn, and electrical shock.
Conclusions
Based on the history of implantable medical device hacking, SCS systems may also be susceptible to manipulation. As the prevalence of SCS use increases and SCS systems continuously evolve in the direction of wireless control and compatibility with mobile devices, appropriate measures should be taken by manufacturers and governmental agencies to ensure safety.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- AES-CCM:
-
Advanced encryption standard–counter with cipher block chaining message authentication code
- FDA:
-
Food and Drug Administration
- IPG:
-
Implantable pulse generator
- RF:
-
Radiofrequency
- SCS:
-
Spinal cord stimulation
- SDR:
-
Software-defined radio
References
Amirdelfan K, Vallejo R, Benyamin R, Yu C, Yang T, Bundschu R, Yearwood TL, Sitzman BT, Gliner B, Subbaroyan J, Rotte A, Caraway D (2020) High-frequency spinal cord stimulation at 10 kHz for the treatment of combined neck and arm pain: results from a prospective multicenter study. Neurosurgery 87:176–185
Baber Z, Erdek MA (2016) Failed back surgery syndrome: current perspectives. J Pain Res 9:979–987
Bendersky D, Yampolsky C (2014) Is spinal cord stimulation safe? A review of its complications. World Neurosurg 82:1359–1368
Boston Scientific (2019) ImageReady MRI Head Only Guidelines for Precision Spectra Spinal Cord Stimulation System. https://www.bostonscientific.com/content/dam/Manuals/us/current-rev-en/91057049-04_ImageReady™_MRI_Head_Only_Guidelines_for_Precision_Spectra™_Spinal_Cord_Stimulator_System_s.pdf. Accessed 27 Mar 2020
Boston Scientific (2019) Precision Spectra Spinal Cord Stimulator System—Information for Prescribers https://www.bostonscientific.com/content/dam/Manuals/us/current-rev-en/92304887-01_Precision_Spectra™_SCS_System_en-US_s.pdf. Accessed 27 Mar 2020
Caylor J, Reddy R, Yin S, Cui C, Huang M, Huang C, Rao R, Baker DG, Simmons A, Souza D, Narouze S, Vallejo R, Lerman I (2019) Spinal cord stimulation in chronic pain: evidence and theory for mechanisms of action. Bioelectron Med 5:12
Deer TR, Jain S, Hunter C, Chakravarthy K (2019) Neurostimulation for intractable chronic pain. Brain Sci 9:23
Garcia K, Wray JK, Kumar S (2020) Spinal Cord Stimulation https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK553154/. Accessed 24 Mar 2020
Kapural L, Yu C, Doust MW, Gliner BE, Vallejo R, Sitzman BT, Amirdelfan K, Morgan DM, Yearwood TL, Bundschu R, Yang T, Benyamin R, Burgher AH (2016) Comparison of 10-kHz high-frequency and traditional low-frequency spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic back and leg pain: 24-month results from a multicenter, randomized, controlled pivotal trial. Neurosurgery 79:667–677
Kunnumpurath S, Srinivasagopalan R, Vadivelu N (2009) Spinal cord stimulation: principles of past, present and future practice: a review. J Clin Monit Comput 23:333–339
Marin E, Singelée D, Yang B, Volski V, Vandenbosch GAE, Nuttin B, Preneel B (2018) Securing wireless neurostimulators. CODASPY ’18: Proceedings of the Eighth ACM Conference on Data and Application Security and Privacy 287-298
Marjenin T, Scott P, Bajaj A, Bansal T, Berne B, Bowsher K, Costello A, Doucet J, Franca E, Ghosh C, Govindarajan A, Gutowski S, Gwinn K, Hinckley S, Keegan E, Lee H, Mathews B, Misra S, Patel S, Tang X, Heetderks W, Hoffmann M, Pena C (2020) FDA perspectives on the regulation of neuromodulation devices. Neuromodulation 23:3–9
McCreery DB, Agnew WF, Yuen TG, Bullara L (1990) Charge density and charge per phase as cofactors in neural injury induced by electrical stimulation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 37:996–1001
Medtronic (2017) Medtronic Intellis with AdaptiveStim Technology, Intellis: Rechargeable Neurostimulators—Implant Manual http://manuals.medtronic.com/content/dam/emanuals/neuro/CONTRIB_248485.pdf. Accessed 27 Mar 2020
Medtronic (2017) MRI Guidelines for Medtronic Neurostimulation Systems for Chronic Pain http://manuals.medtronic.com/content/dam/emanuals/neuro/CONTRIB_248483.pdf. Accessed 29 Mar 2020
Medtronic (2019) Medtronic Neuromodulation Clinician Programmer App—Programming Guide http://manuals.medtronic.com/content/dam/emanuals/neuro/M962281A_a_045_view_color.pdf. Accessed 27 Mar 2020
Medtronic (2019) Neurostimulation Systems for Pain—Reference Manual http://manuals.medtronic.com/content/dam/emanuals/neuro/MA00152A_a_182_view.pdf. Accessed 28 Mar 2020
Moore DM, McCrory C (2016) Spinal cord stimulation. BJA Educ 16:258–263
Nelson JT, Tepe V (2015) Neuromodulation research and application in the U.S. Department of Defense. Brain Stimul 8:247–252
Nevro Corp (2015) Patient Manual https://s24.q4cdn.com/932612397/files/doc_downloads/patient_manuals/Patient_Manual-(11052).pdf. Accessed 23 Mar 2020
Oakley JC, Krames ES, Stamatos J, Foster AM (2008) Successful long-term outcomes of spinal cord stimulation despite limited pain relief during temporary trialing. Neuromodulation 11:66–73
Pohl J, Noack A (2017) Universal radio hacker: a suite for wireless protocol analysis. IoTS&P ’17: Proceedings of the 2017 Workshop on Internet of Things Security and Privacy 59-60
Pycroft L, Boccard SG, Owen SLF, Stein JF, Fitzgerald JJ, Green AL, Aziz TZ (2016) Brainjacking: implant security issues in invasive neuromodulation. World Neurosurg 92:454–462
Radcliffe J (2011) Hacking medical devices for fun and insulin: breaking the human SCADA system. Black Hat Information Security Research Conference https://media.blackhat.com/bh-us-11/Radcliffe/BH_US_11_Radcliffe_Hacking_Medical_Devices_WP.pdf. Accessed 29 Mar 2020
Russo M, Van Buyten JP (2015) 10-kHz high-frequency SCS therapy: a clinical summary. Pain Med 16:934–942
Sdrulla AD, Guan Y, Raja SN (2018) Spinal cord stimulation: clinical efficacy and potential mechanisms. Pain Pract 18:1048–1067
Serrano-Muñoz D, Avendaño-Coy J, Simón-Martínez C, Taylor J, Gómez-Soriano J (2018) Effect of high-frequency alternating current transcutaneous stimulation over muscle strength: a controlled pilot study. J Neuroeng Rehabil 15:103
St. Jude Medical (2015) MRI Procedure Information: For St. Jude Medical MR Conditional Neurostimulation Systems—Clinician’s Manual https://manuals.sjm.com/~/media/manuals/product-manual-pdfs/e/8/e809b699-a364-41bc-8 cc7-b7fc43035ae2.pdf. Accessed 29 Mar 2020
St. Jude Medical (2016) Prodigy Neurostimulation System Programming and Reference: Models 3855, 3856—Clinician’s Manual https://manuals.sjm.com/~/media/manuals/product-manual-pdfs/6/f/6f1f57c7-db55-4ade-8ad4-086bf24eb490.pdf. Accessed 27 Mar 2020
St. Jude Medical (2017) St. Jude Medical Patient Controller for Spinal Cord Stimulation Systems: Model 3875—User’s Guide https://manuals.sjm.com/~/media/manuals/product-manual-pdfs/1/7/17e056d6-6834-4fcc-b454-72a358be72e5.pdf. Accessed 27 Mar 2020
Vallejo R, Bradley K, Kapural L (2017) Spinal cord stimulation in chronic pain: mode of action. Spine 42:S53–S60
Vannemreddy P, Slavin KV (2011) Spinal cord stimulation: current applications for treatment of chronic pain. Anesth Essays Res 5:20–27
Acknowledgments
We thank the Abbott Laboratories, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and Nevro for their input on the functionality and technological specifications of the SCS systems described in this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Dr. Antonios Mammis is a paid consultant for the Abbott Laboratories, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and Nevro.
Ethics approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Comments
The vulnerability of electronic implants to external interference - both accidental and intentional - is well-known and has been a concern of patients, physicians, and even fiction writers. Here, the authors analyze features of various spinal cord stimulation devices and provide suggestions for future developments; the similarities and differences among device manufacturers and stimulator types becomes more obvious when the information is well summarized. One of the conclusions that may be drawn from reading the paper - the neuromodulation landscape is both complex and confusing, and is constantly changing. Perhaps the steps in certain standardization of charging and communication, akin to what is being done in creation of standardized connectors and headers, would facilitate creation of universal security protocols and protection from “neurohacking,” giving some peace of mind to current and future neuromodulation recipients.
Konstantin Slavin, MD
Chicago, Illinois, USA
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Functional Neurosurgery - Pain
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Markosian, C., Taruvai, V.S. & Mammis, A. Neuromodulatory hacking: a review of the technology and security risks of spinal cord stimulation. Acta Neurochir 162, 3213–3219 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-020-04592-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-020-04592-3