Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of leukocyte esterase test strips for rapid diagnosis of subclinical mastitis in dairy cows

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Comparative Clinical Pathology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 10 May 2019

This article has been updated

Abstract

Subclinical mastitis is difficult to detect because it has no visible indications and requires special tests to be detected. Therefore, an untimely and precise diagnosis of subclinical mastitis has been suggested. The purpose of this paper was to estimate the performance of the Analyticon reagent strip test application for the diagnosis of subclinical mastitis as a cow-side test. Milk samples from 111 dairy cows were collected and the leukocyte esterase (LE) test was performed with the reagent strip test. Leukocyte esterase activity was estimated following 10 (LE10) and 15 (LE15) min. Also, milk somatic cell count (SCC) obtained by an automated Fossomatic machine was considered as the gold standard for diagnosing subclinical mastitis. The specificity (Sp), sensitivity (Se), positive likelihood ratio (+LR), negative likelihood ratio (−LR), area under the receiver operating curve (AUC), and kappa coefficient (κ) were determined. The 75.7% (84/111) milk samples with SCC ≥ 200,000/mL were considered as the subclinical mastitis milk. A strong statistically significant correlation was found between SCC, LE test marker, and SCC scoring (0–3) in all milk samples. Based on the cutoff point, the LE15 test had Se = 80%, Sp = 100%, +LR = ∞, and −LR = 0.20. There was a very close relation between LE15 and SCC test with a kappa coefficient of 0.70 (P < 0.0001). Also, according to the cutoff point of 0.5, the LE10 test had Se = 64%, Sp = 100%, +LR = ∞, and −LR = 0.36. In addition, there was a very close relation between LE10 and SCC tests with a kappa coefficient of 0.50 (P < 0.0001). The LE activity was significantly higher (P < 0.05) in subclinical mastitis samples compared to that of healthy milk samples at the time of 10 and 15 min. In summary, these results showed a strong correlation among the LE test markers with the reagent strip test of Analyticon and SCC using the Fossomatic machine. Based on such findings, it is suggested that the LE activity could be used as a clinically useful cow-side test and a valid method for screening the subclinical mastitis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 10 May 2019

    The affiliation of Abolfazl Hajibemani in the original published version of this article was incorrect. Instead of Tabriz University, it should have been University of Tabriz.

  • 10 May 2019

    The affiliation of Abolfazl Hajibemani in the original published version of this article was incorrect. Instead of Tabriz University, it should have been University of Tabriz.

References

  • Blowey RW, Edmondson P (2010) Mastitis control in dairy herdsCabi: an illustrated and practical guide. Farming Press Books, Ipswich

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Booth R, Morse G, Treece J, Sammelwitz P (1965) Relationship of a-esterase activity blood-serum albumin and leukocyte count during experimental exposure to streptococcus agalactiae (cornell strain 48). J Dairy Sci 822

  • Cheong S, Nydam D, Galvao K, Crosier B, Ricci A, Caixeta L, Sper R, Fraga M, Gilbert R (2012) Use of reagent test strips for diagnosis of endometritis in dairy cows. Theriogenology 77:858–864

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Couto G, Vaillancourt D, Lefebvre R (2013) Comparison of a leukocyte esterase test with endometrial cytology for diagnosis of subclinical endometritis in postpartum dairy cows. Theriogenology 79:103–107

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Djabri B, Bareille N, Beaudeau F, Seegers H (2002) Quarter milk somatic cell count in infected dairy cows: a meta-analysis. Vet Res 33:335–357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Forster T, Montgomery M, Montoure J (1961) Some factors influencing the activity of the A-, B-, and C-esterases of bovine milk1. J Dairy Sci 44:1420–1430

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hajibemani A, Mirzaei A, Sharifiyazdi H, Ghasrodashti AR (2016) Vaginal fornix discharge cellularity and its leukocyte esterase activity for diagnosis of endometritis in dairy cows. J Fac Vet Med Istunbul Univ i 42:57–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiss S, Mueller U, Neu-Zahren A ,Sauerwein H (2007) Haptoglobin and lactate dehydrogenase measurements in milk for the identification of subclinically diseased udder quarters. Vet Med -praha-;52:245

  • Iraguha B, Hamudikuwanda H, Mushonga B, Kandiwa E, Mpatswenumugabo JP (2017) Comparison of cow-side diagnostic tests for subclinical mastitis of dairy cows in Musanze district, Rwanda. J S Afr Vet Assoc 88:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones GM ,Bailey TL (2009) Understanding the basics of mastitis

  • Kandeel SA, Ebied MH, Arnaout FK, Galila EM, Megahed AA, Constable PD (2017) Clinical utility of two leukocyte esterase reagent strips for the cow-side diagnosis of subclinical mastitis in lactating dairy cattle. Assiut Vet Med J:63

  • KrrcHEN B (1981) Review of the progress of dairy science: bovine mastitis: milk compositional changes and related diagnostic test. J Dairy Res 48:167–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam T, Riekerink RO, Sampimon O, Smith H (2009) Mastitis diagnostics and performance monitoring: a practical approach. Ir Vet J 62:S34

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Luedecke L, Forster T, Ashworth U (1967) Relationship between California mastitis test reaction and leucocyte count, catalase activity, and A-esterase activity of milk from opposite Quarters1. J Dairy Sci 50:1592–1596

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marquardt R, Forster T, Spencer G, Stabenfeldt G (1966) A-esterase activities of milk from cows with experimentally induced mastitis1, 2. J Dairy Sci 49:631–635

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Philpot WN, Nickerson SC (2000) Winning the fight against mastitis. Westfalia Surge, Inc., Napervile, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Pillai S, Kunze E, Sordillo L, Jayarao B (2001) Application of differential inflammatory cell count as a tool to monitor udder health. J Dairy Sci 84:1413–1420

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • PortaCheck (2010) PortaSCC® cow test - research." Welcome to PortaCheck Porta Check, INC Web 28 Nov. <http://www.portacheck.com/portasccresearch.php

  • PortaCheck (2011) The PortaSCC® milk test is a somatic cell count test for early on-farm mastitis detection in cows. Moorestown, NJ. http://www.portacheck.com

  • Pyörälä S (2003) Indicators of inflammation in the diagnosis of mastitis. Vet Res 34:565–578

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman M, Islam M, Uddin M, Aktaruzzaman M (2010) Prevalence of subclinical mastitis in dairy cows reared in Sylhet district of Bangladesh. Int J Bio Res 1:23–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues A, Cassoli L, Machado P, Ruegg P (2009) Evaluation of an on-farm test to estimate somatic cell count. J Dairy Sci 92:990–995

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ruegg P, Reinemann D (2002) Milk quality and mastitis tests. Bovine Pract 36:41–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Salvador R, Soliven R, Balagan E, Abes N, Gutierrez C, Mingala C (2014) Evaluation of a portable somatic cell counter in the diagnosis of bubaline subclinical mastitis. Thai J Agric Sci 47:205–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Schukken YH, Wilson DJ, Welcome F, Garrison-Tikofsky L, Gonzalez RN (2003) Monitoring udder health and milk quality using somatic cell counts. Vet Res 34:579–596

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz L, Broom R, Jasper D, Berger RM, Natwke R, Philpot W, Smith J, Thompson P (1978) Current concepts of bovine mastitis. In: The National Mastitis Council;1–16

  • Smolenski G, Haines S, Kwan FY-S, Bond J, Farr V, Davis SR, Stelwagen K, Wheeler TT (2007) Characterisation of host defence proteins in milk using a proteomic approach. J Proteome Res 6:207–215

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • St John A, Boyd JC, Lowes AJ, Price CP (2006) The use of urinary dipstick tests to exclude urinary tract infection: a systematic review of the literature. Am J Clin Pathol 126:428–436

  • Viguier C, Arora S, Gilmartin N, Welbeck K, O’Kennedy R (2009) Mastitis detection: current trends and future perspectives. Trends Biotechnol 27:486–493

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • YalÇin C (2000) Cost of mastitis in Scottish dairy herds with low and high subclinical mastitis problems. Turk J Vet Anim Sci 24:465–472

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadoks RN, Schukken YH (2006) Use of molecular epidemiology in veterinary practice. Vet Clin: Food Anim Pract 22:229–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao X, Lacasse P (2008) Mammary tissue damage during bovine mastitis: causes and control. J Anim Sci 86:57–65

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by the Research Council of Shiraz University and School of Veterinary Medicine, Shiraz University (Grant No. 87-GR-VT-47).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hassan Sharifiyazdi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This experiment was performed under the approval of the state committee on animal ethics, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran. Also, the recommendations of European Council Directive (86/609/EC) of November 24, 1986, regarding the protection of animals used for experimental purposes, were considered.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mirzaei, A., Khorsand, A., Hajibemani, A. et al. Evaluation of leukocyte esterase test strips for rapid diagnosis of subclinical mastitis in dairy cows. Comp Clin Pathol 28, 151–156 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00580-018-2808-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00580-018-2808-0

Keywords

Navigation