Skip to main content
Log in

Newfound compassion after prostate cancer: a psychometric evaluation of additional items in the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The most widely used measure of posttraumatic growth (PTG) is the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI). Qualitative research indicates the importance of increased compassion as a result of struggling with challenges presented by cancer and treatments. However, current PTG measures may not adequately assess compassion.

Methods

A cross-sectional survey of 514 prostate cancer survivors assessed the PTGI and Dispositional Positive Emotional Scale (DPES). Five additional PTG items were derived from previous qualitative research to assess increased compassion.

Results

After removing eight items with complex loadings, a principal components analysis with oblimin rotation revealed a six-component structure. A clear delineation was seen between components relating to compassion, new possibilities, relating to others, personal strength, appreciation of life and spiritual change. Compassion accounted for 48.9 % of variance in data, with the overall model accounting for 79.9 % of variance. Strong factorability was demonstrated through Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (0.92) and Bartlett's test of sphericity (approximate χ 2 = 5,791.85, df 153, p < 0.001). The six-component structure was validated with a confirmatory factor analysis. Strong internal consistency was evidenced through Cronbach's alpha coefficients ranging from 0.74 to 0.90 for subscales, and item-to-total correlations and inter-item correlations exceeded accepted thresholds of 0.50 and 0.30, respectively. Convergent validity was acceptable between the PTGI compassion subscale and DPES (r = 0.50).

Conclusions

Compassion is a highly salient PTG domain after prostate cancer. Further studies can explore this construct with more heterogeneous samples of cancer types and gender.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare & Australasian Association of Cancer Registries 2010. Cancer in Australia: an overview, 2010. Cancer series no. 60. Cat. no. CAN 56. Canberra: AIHW

  2. Cordova MJ, Giese-Davis J, Golant M, Kronenwetter C, Chang V, Spiegel D (2007) Breast cancer as trauma: posttraumatic stress and posttraumatic growth. J Clin Psychol Med Settings 14:308–319. doi:10.1007/s10880-007-9083-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Stanton AL, Bower JE, Low CA (2006) Posttraumatic growth after cancer. In: Calhoun LG et al (eds) Handbook of posttraumatic growth: research and practice. Erlbaum, New Jersey, pp 138–175

    Google Scholar 

  4. Calhoun LG, Cann A, Tedeschi RG (2010) The posttraumatic growth model: sociocultural considerations. In: Weiss T et al (eds) Posttraumatic growth and culturally competent practice: lessons learned from around the globe. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tedeschi RG, Calhoun LG (1996) The Posttraumatic Growth Inventory: measuring the positive legacy of trauma. J Trauma Stress 9:455–471. doi:10.1002/jts.2490090305

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Morris BA, Shakespeare-Finch J (2010) Rumination, posttraumatic growth, and distress: structural equation modelling with cancer survivors. Psycho-Oncology 20:1176–1183. doi:10.1002/pon.1827

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Leung YW, Alter DA, Prior PL, Stewart DE, Irvine J, Grace SL (2012) Posttraumatic growth in coronary artery disease outpatients: relationship to degree of trauma and health service use. J Psychosom Res 72:293–299. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2011.12.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ackroyd K, Fortune DG, Price S, Howell S, Sharrack B, Isaac CL (2011) Adversarial growth in patients with multiple sclerosis and their partners: relationships with illness perceptions, disability and distress. J Clin Psychol Med Settings 18:372–379. doi:10.1007/s10880-011-9265-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Levine SZ, Laufer A, Stein E, Hamama-Raz Y, Solomon Z (2009) Examining the relationship between resilience and posttraumatic growth. J Trauma Stress 22:282–286. doi:10.1002/jts.20409

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kilic C (2010) Posttraumatic growth in the Turkish population. In: Weiss T et al (eds) Posttraumatic growth and culturally competent practice: lessons learned from around the globe. Wiley, New York, pp 49–64

    Google Scholar 

  11. Arenliu A, Landsman MS (2010) Thriving in postwar Kosova. In: Weiss T et al (eds) Posttraumatic growth and culturally competent practice: lessons learned from around the globe. Wiley, New York, pp 65–72

    Google Scholar 

  12. Maercker A, Langner R (2001) Posttraumatic personal growth: validation of German versions of two questionnaires. Diagnostica 47:153–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ho SMY, Chan CLW, Ho RTH (2004) Posttraumatic growth in Chinese cancer survivors. Psycho-Oncology 13:377–389. doi:10.1002/pon.758

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jaarsma T, Pool G, Sanderman R, Ranchor AV (2006) Psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory among cancer patients. Psycho-Oncology 15:911–920

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Taku K, Calhoun LG, Tedeschi RG, Gil-Rivas V, Kilmer RP, Cann A (2007) Examining posttraumatic growth among Japanese university students. Anxiety Stress Coping 20:353–367. doi:10.1080/10615800701295007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kovacs E, Balog P, Preisz L (2012) Psychometric characteristics of the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory in a Hungarian sample. Mentalhigiene es Pszichoszomatika 13:57–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Weiss T, Berger R (2006) Reliability and validity of a Spanish version of the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory. Res Soc Work Pract 16:191–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Morris BA, Shakespeare-Finch J, Rieck M, Newbery J (2005) Multidimensional nature of posttraumatic growth in an Australian population. J Trauma Stress 18:575–585. doi:10.1002/jts.20067

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hefferon K, Grealy M, Mutrie N (2009) Post-traumatic growth and life threatening physical illness: a systematic review of the qualitative literature. Br J Heal Psychol 14:343–378. doi:10.1348/135910708X332936

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Shakespeare-Finch JE, Copping A (2006) A grounded theory approach to understanding cultural differences in posttraumatic growth. J Loss Trauma 11:355–371. doi:10.1080/15325020600671949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Morris BA, Shakespeare-Finch J, Scott JL (2012) Posttraumatic growth after cancer: the importance of health-related benefits and newfound compassion for others. Suppor Care Cancer 20:749–756. doi:10.1007/s00520-011-1143-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Shiota MN, Keltner D, John OP (2006) Positive emotion dispositions differentially associated with Big Five personality and attachment style. J Posit Psychol 1:61–71. doi:10.1080/17439760500510833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Goetz JL, Keltner D, Simon-Thomas E (2010) Compassion: an evolutionary analysis and empirical review. Psychol Bull 136:351–374. doi:10.1037/a0018807

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Blac WC (1998) Multivariate data analysis. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hu L, Bentler PM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model 6:1–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tabachnick B, Fidell L (2007) Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Pearson/Allyn & Bacon, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  27. Barrett P (2007) Structural equation modelling: adjudging model fit. Personal Individ Differ 42:815–824. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Thornton A, Perez M (2006) Posttraumatic growth in prostate cancer survivors and their partners. Psycho-Oncology 15:285–296. doi:10.1002/pon.953

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. MacBeth A, Gumley A (2012) Exploring compassion: a meta-analysis of the association between self-compassion and psychopathology. Clin Psychol Rev 32:545–552. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2012.06.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Parry C, Chesler MA (2005) Thematic evidence of psychosocial thriving in childhood cancer survivors. Qual Heal Res 15:1055–1073. doi:10.1177/1049732305277860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Coward DD, Kahn DL (2005) Transcending breast cancer: making meaning from diagnosis and treatment. J Holist Nurs 23:264–283. doi:10.1177/0898010105277649

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge the contribution of Arnie Cann, Lawrence Calhoun and Richard Tedeschi in providing feedback on initial drafts of this manuscript. We would also like to thank the Brisbane Prostate Support Network, the Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia and Cancer Council Queensland for their assistance in this project.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no disclosures in regards to financial relationships with organisations that sponsored this research. The authors have full control of all primary data and we agree to allow the journal to review the data if requested.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bronwyn A. Morris.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morris, B.A., Wilson, B. & Chambers, S.K. Newfound compassion after prostate cancer: a psychometric evaluation of additional items in the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory. Support Care Cancer 21, 3371–3378 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-013-1903-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-013-1903-7

Keywords

Navigation