Skip to main content
Log in

Endoscopic management of inveterate esophageal perforations and leaks

  • Case Reports
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The endoscopic management of four selected patients with inveterate esophageal perforations or leaks is presented. One patient had a perforation of the cervical esophagus following endoscopic removal of a foreign body already treated with surgical drainage; two patients had a leak following diverticulectomy and esophagogastrostomy, respectively, persistent after multiple surgical repairs; the last patient had a spontaneous perforation of the thoracic esophagus persistent after two transthoracic repairs. The mean time elapsed between the diagnosis of perforation and the endoscopic treatment was 19 days. In one patient, transesophageal drainage of a mediastinal abscess was performed. In the other three patients, a stent was placed to seal the leak in combination with gastric and esophageal aspiration. Two of these patients underwent endoscopy in critical condition and could have not been candidates for major surgical procedures. All patients received enteral nutrition. No morbidity or mortality related to the endoscopic procedure was recorded; the treatment was effective in all patients who recovered and resumed oral feeding within 3 weeks. We conclude that endoscopic transesophageal drainage and stenting are effective procedures in the management of patients with inveterate esophageal perforations or leaks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bardini R, Bonavina L, Pavanello M, Asolati M, Peracchia A (1992) Temporary double exclusion of the perforated esophagus using absorbable staples. Ann Thorac Surg 54: 1165–1167

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bruckner M, Grimm H, Nam VC, Soehendra N (1991) Experience with a transnasally fixed endoprosthesis for treating esophageal anastomotic leakage. Surg Endosc 5: 185–188

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cameron JL, Kieffer RF, Hendrix TR, Mehigan DG, Baker RR (1979) Selective nonoperative management of contained intrathoracic esophageal disruptions. Ann Thorac Surg 27: 404–408

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cusumano A, Ruol A, Segalin A, Norberto L, Baessato M, Peracchia A (1992) Push through intubation: effective palliation in 409 patients with cancer of the esophagus and cardia. Ann Thorac Surg 53: 1020–1014

    Google Scholar 

  5. DeMeester TR (1986) Perforation of the esophagus [Editorial]. Ann Thorac Surg 42: 231–232

    Google Scholar 

  6. Flynn AE, Verrier ED, Way LW, Thomas AN, Pellegrini CA (1989) Esophageal perforation. Arch Surg 124: 1211–1215

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jones WJ, Ginsberg RJ (1992) Esophageal perforation: a continuing challenge. Ann Thorac Surg 53: 534–543

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jorgensen JO, Hunt DR (1993) Endoscopic drainage of esophageal suture lines leaks. Am J Surg 165: 362–364

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mc Namee CJ, Meyns B, Pagliero KM (1991) New method for dealing with late-presenting spontaneous esophageal ruptures. Ann Thorac Surg 52: 151–153

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ofek B, Hoffman J (1986) Non-invasive treatment of esophagogastric anastomoitc leakage. Arch Surg 121: 124

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sandrasagra FA, English TAH, Milstein BB (1978) Intubation in the management of perforated esophagus with stricture. Ann Thorac Surg 25: 399–401

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sargeant IR, Thrope S, Bown SG (1992) Cuffed esophageal prosthesis: a useful device in desperate situation in esophageal malignancy. Gastrointest Endosc 38: 669–675

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Segalin, A., Bonavina, L., Lazzerini, M. et al. Endoscopic management of inveterate esophageal perforations and leaks. Surg Endosc 10, 928–932 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00188486

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00188486

Key words

Navigation