Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: Although laparoscopic appendectomy is widely practiced in developed countries, still there are many questions regarding the advantages and disadvantages of this approach in the treatment of acute appendicitis. Several controlled trials have been conducted, some in favor of laparoscopic appendectomy others not. The aim of this study was to evaluate laparoscopic appendectomy in comparison with open appendectomy, with special emphasis on postoperative septic complications. Methods: For this study, 227 consecutive patients (159 males and 68 females) with a diagnosis of suspected appendicitis between 1995 and 1999 were assigned either to laparoscopic appendectomy (n = 108) or open appendectomy (n = 119). The patients were assigned according to insurance company approval and patient preference. There were no exclusion criteria and no age limits in this study. Results: Wound infection was significantly higher in the open group (incidence, 7.6%) than in the laparoscopic group (incidence, 0%; p < 0.003). Intraabdominal infections were equal in both groups. Hospital stay was significantly shorter in the laparoscopic group (p < 0.046), but operative time was little longer than in the open group (p < 0.002). Conversion to open surgery was necessary in one case. Conclusions: Laparoscopic appendectomy is as safe and effective as the open procedure. It significantly reduces the rate of postoperative wound infection. However, it is still acceptable to perform the open procedure, especially in hospitals without a large amount of laparoscopic experience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. RE Andersson A Hugander AJG Thulin (1992) ArticleTitleDiagnostic accuracy and perforation rate in appendicitis: association with age and sex of the patient and with appendicectomy rate. Eur J Surg 158 37–41 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By2B38zhvFw%3D Occurrence Handle1348639

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. KN Apelgren RG Molnar JM Kisala (1995) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic is not better than open appendectomy. Ann Surg 61 240–243 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqC1Mzpt1c%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. SE Attwood ADK Hill PG Murphy J Thomton RB Stephens (1992) ArticleTitleProspective randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Surgery 112 497–501 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By2A1M%2FotlE%3D Occurrence Handle1387739

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. M Chiarugi P Buccianti G Celona L Decanini MC Martino O Goletti E Cavina (1996) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic compared with open appendectomy for acute appendicitis: a prospective study. Eur J Surg 162 385–390 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymA2srmtV0%3D Occurrence Handle8781920

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. TJ Conner IS Garcha BJ Ramshaw CW Mitchell JP Wilson EM Mason TD Duncan FA Dozier GW Lucas (1995) ArticleTitleDiagnostic laparoscopy for suspected appendicitis. Am Surg 61 187–189 Occurrence Handle7856985

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. MR Cox JL MacCall J Toouli RT Padbury TG Wilson DA Wattchow M Langcake (1996) ArticleTitleProspective randomized comparison of open versus laparoscopic appendectomy in men. World J Surg 20 263–266 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s002689900041 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymA38rmt1U%3D Occurrence Handle8661828

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. RC Frazee WT Bohannon (1996) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. Arch Surg 131 509–512 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymB3cbgtVQ%3D Occurrence Handle8624197

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. JB Hansen MB Smithers D Schache DR Wall BJ Miller BL Menzies (1996) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic versus open appendectomy: prospective randomized trial. World J Surg 20 17–21 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s002689900003 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymC2cfjsVI%3D Occurrence Handle8588406

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. A Klingler KP Henle S Beller J Rechner A Zerz GJ Wetscher G Szinicz (1998) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic appendectomy does not change the incidence of postoperative infectious complications. Am J Surg 175 232–235 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(97)00286-9 Occurrence Handle9560127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. CK Kum SS Ngoi PM Goh Y Tekant JR Isaac (1993) ArticleTitleRandomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic and open appendicectomy. Br J Surg 80 1599–1600 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByuC3s%2Fgs1Q%3D Occurrence Handle8298936

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. JA Lujan Mompean R Robles Campos P Parrilla Paricio V Soria Aldeo J Garcia Ayllon (1994) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic vs open appendicectomy: a prospective assessment. Br J Surg 81 133–135 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByuC2cjgs1E%3D Occurrence Handle8313090

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. LC Martin I Puente JL Sosa A Bassin R Breslaw MG McKenney E Ginzburg D Sleeman (1995) ArticleTitleOpen versus laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective randomized comparison. Ann Surg 222 256–262 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqH3cjpsF0%3D Occurrence Handle7677456

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. AM Merhoff GC Merhoff M Franklin (2000) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Am J Surg 179 375–378 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(00)00373-1 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvitl2itg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10930483

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. L Meynaud-Kraemer C Colin P Vergnon X Barth (1999) ArticleTitleWound infection in open versus laparoscopic appendectomy: a meta-analysis. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 15 380–391 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1MvjslSqtg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10507196

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. AC Moberg A Montgomery (1997) ArticleTitleAppendicitis: laparoscopic versus conventional operation: a study and review of literature. Surg Laparosc Endosc 7 459–463 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00019509-199712000-00005 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c%2FpvFCltg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9438626

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. AE Ortega JG Hunter JH Peters LL Swanstrom B Schirmer (1995) ArticleTitleA prospective randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy. Am J Surg 169 208–212 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(99)80138-X Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqC2c3jvVc%3D Occurrence Handle7840381

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. PS Paik JA Towson GJ Anthone AE Ortega AJ Simons RW Beart Jr (1997) ArticleTitleIntraabdominal abscesses following laparoscopic and open appendectomies. J Gastrointest Surg 1 188–193 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1091-255X(97)80108-4 Occurrence Handle9834347

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. O Reiertsen S Larsen E Trondsen B Edwin AE Faerden AR Rosseland (1997) ArticleTitleRandomized control trial with sequential design of laparoscopic versus conventional appendicectomy. Br J Surg 84 842–847 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiA3s3psVc%3D Occurrence Handle9189105

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. K Semm (1983) ArticleTitleEndoscopic appendectomy. Endoscopy 15 59–64 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiyB3cbks1Y%3D Occurrence Handle6221925

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. JJT Tate (1996) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic appendectomy. Br J Surg 83 1169–1170 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.1996.02476.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiC3crkt1c%3D Occurrence Handle8983601

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. LK Temple DE Litwin RS McLoid (1999) ArticleTitleA meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in patients suspected of having acute appendicitis. Can J Surg 42 377–383 Occurrence Handle10526524

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Saudi German Hospitals Group—Jeddah, P.O. Box 2550, Jeddah 21461, Saudi Arabia

    M. Marzouk, M. Khater, M. Elsadek & A. Abdelmoghny

Authors
  1. M. Marzouk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Khater
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. Elsadek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. A. Abdelmoghny
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Marzouk.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marzouk, M., Khater, M., Elsadek, M. et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy . Surg Endosc 17, 721–724 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-002-9069-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-002-9069-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation