Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of Craniocervical Flexion on Suprahyoid and Sternocleidomastoid Muscle Activation in Different Exercises

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Dysphagia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the effects of craniocervical flexion (CCF) on the activation of suprahyoid and sternocleidomastoid (SCM) muscles in Shaker and Resistant Jaw Opening (RJO) exercises, and to compare the effects of these two exercises on the same muscles with the Chin Tuck Against Resistance (CTAR) exercise. The study recruited a total of 37 healthy participants (20 female and 17 male, mean age: 27.45 ± 7.32 years). All participants received craniocervical flexion training with the biofeedback pressure unit (Stabilizer™, Chattanooga Group Inc. USA). Shaker, Shaker with CCF, RJO, RJO with CCF and CTAR exercises were performed and surface electromyographic (sEMG) activations of the suprahyoid and SCM muscles were recorded. In addition, the maximum sEMG activations of suprahyoid and SCM muscles were recorded for the normalization procedure. CCF increased the effect of Shaker exercise on the suprahyoid muscle activation (p < 0.001); but this effect was not seen in RJO exercise (p > 0.05). Suprahyoid muscle activation was lower in Shaker exercise compared to RJO and CTAR exercises (p < 0.016). SCM muscle activation was greater in CTAR exercise compared to Shaker and RJO exercises (p < 0.016). The addition of CCF to the Shaker and RJOE exercises did not affect the ranking among the three exercises for both the suprahyoid and SCM muscles. The result of this study suggest that integration of CCF movement to the Shaker exercise would have a greater therapeutic effect. In addition, RJO exercise can be included in the rehabilitation program as an alternate to CTAR exercise.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Logemann JA. Dysphagia: evaluation and treatment. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 1995;47(3):140–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Macht M, White SD, Moss M. Swallowing dysfunction after critical illness. Chest. 2014;146(6):1681–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Shaker R, Kern M, Bardan E, Taylor A, Stewart ET, Hoffmann RG, et al. Augmentation of deglutitive upper esophageal sphincter opening in the elderly by exercise. Am J Physiol. 1997;272(6 Pt 1):G1518–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yoon WL, Khoo JK, Rickard Liow SJ. Chin tuck against resistance (CTAR): new method for enhancing suprahyoid muscle activity using a Shaker-type exercise. Dysphagia. 2014;29(2):243–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Oh JC, Kwon JS. Effects of resistive jaw-opening exercise with elastic resistance bands on suprahyoid musclein normal subjects. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2018;73(3–4):101–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kilinc HE, Arslan SS, Demir N, Karaduman A. The effects of different exercise trainings on suprahyoid muscle activation, tongue pressure force and dysphagia limit in healthy subjects. Dysphagia. 2020;35(4):717–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sze WP, Yoon WL, Escoffier N, Rickard Liow SJ. Evaluating the training effects of two swallowing rehabilitation therapies using surface electromyography-chin tuck against resistance (CTAR) exercise and the Shaker exercise. Dysphagia. 2016;31(2):195–205.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. White KT, Easterling C, Roberts N, Wertsch J, Shaker R. Fatigue analysis before and after Shaker exercise: physiologic tool for exercise design. Dysphagia. 2008;23(4):385–91.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Easterling C, Grande B, Kern M, Sears K, Shaker R. Attaining and maintaining isometric and isokinetic goals of the Shaker exercise. Dysphagia. 2005;20(2):133–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Conley MS, Meyer RA, Bloomberg JJ, Feeback DL, Dudley GA. Noninvasive analysis of human neck muscle function. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995;20(23):2505–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kamibayashi LK, Richmond FJ. Morphometry of human neck muscles. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998;23(12):1314–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Janda V. Muscles and motor control in cervicogenic disorders. In: Grant R, editor. Physical therapy of the cervical and thoracic spine. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1994. p. 195–215.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kennedy E, Albert M, Nicholson H. Do longus capitis and colli really stabilise the cervical spine? A study of their fascicular anatomy and peak force capabilities. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2017;32:104–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Falla D, Jull G, O’Leary S, Dall’Alba P. Further evaluation of an EMG technique for assessment of the deep cervical flexor muscles. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2006;16(6):621–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Woo HS, Park SH, Jung MY, Yoo EY, Park JH. The effects of cranio-cervical flexion on activation of swallowing-related muscles. J Oral Rehabil. 2012;39(11):805–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Demir N, Serel Arslan S, Inal O, Karaduman AA. Reliability and validity of the Turkish eating assessment tool (T-EAT-10). Dysphagia. 2016;31(5):644–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hansen T, Kjaersgaard A. Item analysis of the eating assessment tool (EAT-10) by the Rasch model: a secondary analysis of cross-sectional survey data obtained among community-dwelling elders. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020;18:1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yoshida M, Groher ME, Crary MA, Mann GC, Akagawa Y. Comparison of surface electromyographic (sEMG) activity of submental muscles between the head lift and tongue press exercises as a therapeutic exercise for pharyngeal dysphagia. Gerodontology. 2007;24(2):111–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Clark G, Browne P, Nakano M, Yang Q. Co-activation of sternocleidomastoid muscles during maximum clenching. J Dent Res. 1993;72(11):1499–502.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Jull GA, O’Leary SP, Falla DL. Clinical assessment of the deep cervical flexor muscles: the craniocervical flexion test. J Manip Physiol Ther. 2008;31(7):525–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Colado JC, Garcia-Masso X, Triplett TN, Flandez J, Borreani S, Tella V. Concurrent validation of the OMNI-resistance exercise scale of perceived exertion with thera-band resistance bands. J Strength Cond Res. 2012;26(11):3018–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Colado JC, Garcia-Masso X, Triplett NT, Calatayud J, Flandez J, Behm D, et al. Construct and concurrent validation of a new resistance intensity scale for exercise with thera-band(R) elastic bands. J Sports Sci Med. 2014;13(4):758–66.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Musto F, Rosati R, Sforza C, Toma M, Dellavia C. Standardised surface electromyography allows effective submental muscles assessment. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2017;34:1–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bulow M, Olsson R, Ekberg O. Videomanometric analysis of supraglottic swallow, effortful swallow, and chin tuck in healthy volunteers. Dysphagia. 1999;14(2):67–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sakuma T, Kida I. Relationship between ease of swallowing and deglutition-related muscle activity in various postures. J Oral Rehabil. 2010;37(8):583–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Jull GA, Falla D, Vicenzino B, Hodges PW. The effect of therapeutic exercise on activation of the deep cervical flexor muscles in people with chronic neck pain. Man Ther. 2009;14(6):696–701.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Moon JH, Jung JH, Hahm SC, Jung KS, Suh HR, Cho HY. Effects of chin tuck exercise using neckline slimmer device on suprahyoid and sternocleidomastoid muscle activation in healthy adults. J Phys Ther Sci. 2018;30(3):454–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Kilinc HE, Yasasoglu ÖF, Arslan SS, Demir N, Topçuoglu MA, Karaduman A. Comparison of normalized muscle activation effects of three different exercises on suprahyoid muscles in healthy subjects. Turk J Physiother Rehabil. 2019;30(1):48–57.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No financial Support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Faculty, Hacettepe University, Samanpazarı/Altındağ, 06230, Ankara, Turkey

    Hasan Erkan Kilinc

  2. Health Science Faculty, Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Department, Lokman Hekim University, Ankara, Turkey

    Banu Ünver

Authors
  1. Hasan Erkan Kilinc
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Banu Ünver
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hasan Erkan Kilinc.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (MP4 16474 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kilinc, H.E., Ünver, B. Effects of Craniocervical Flexion on Suprahyoid and Sternocleidomastoid Muscle Activation in Different Exercises. Dysphagia 37, 1851–1857 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-022-10453-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-022-10453-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation