Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Volumetric Changes to the Pharynx in Healthy Aging: Consequence for Pharyngeal Swallow Mechanics and Function

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Dysphagia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 16 September 2020

This article has been updated

Abstract

Pharyngeal lumen volume is prone to increase as a consequence of pharyngeal muscle atrophy in aging. Yet, the impact of this on swallowing mechanics and function is poorly understood. We examined the relationship between pharyngeal volume and pharyngeal swallowing mechanics and function in a sample of healthy community-dwelling seniors. Data were collected from 44 healthy seniors (21 male, mean age = 76.9, SD = 7.1). Each participant swallowed 9 boluses of barium (3 × 5 ml thin, 3 × 20 ml thin, 3 × 5 ml nectar). Pharyngeal shortening, pharyngeal constriction, pyriform sinus and vallecular residue were quantified from lateral view videofluorosopic swallowing studies. Pharyngeal lumen volume was captured during an oral breathing task with acoustic pharyngometry. In addition, within-participant measures of strength and anthropometrics were collected. Four linear mixed effects regression models were run to study the relationship between pharyngeal volume and pharyngeal constriction, pharyngeal shortening, pyriform sinus residue, and vallecular residue while controlling for bolus condition, age, sex, and posterior tongue strength. Increasing pharyngeal lumen volume was significantly related to worse constriction and vallecular residue. In general, larger and thicker boluses resulted in worse pharyngeal constriction and residue. Pharyngeal shortening was only significantly related to posterior tongue strength. Our work establishes the utility of acoustic pharyngometry to monitor pharyngeal lumen volume. Increasing pharyngeal lumen volume appears to impact both pharyngeal swallowing mechanics and function in a sample of healthy, functional seniors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 16 September 2020

    This erratum notifies the readers of the Dysphagia journal of an error in the original published version of this manuscript. In that manuscript, a previously available open source spreadsheet tool was used to calculate the position of the posterior laryngeal air column on lateral view videofluoroscopic images as a proxy for the bottom of the pharynx. We have subsequently been made aware of an error in the mathematical formula built into the spreadsheet, which resulted in a reversal of the results for the X and Y planes of measurement. This erratum provides corrections to the results and interpretations of the original manuscript.

References

  1. Ortman JM, Velkoff VA, Hogan H: An aging nation: the older population in the United States. Current population reports, U.S. Census Bureau: 25-1140, 2014.

  2. Robbins J. Guest editorial: the current state of clinical geriatric dysphagia research. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2002;4:vii–ix.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chen P, Golub JS, Hapner ER, Johns MM III. Prevalence of perceived dysphagia and quality-of-life impairment in a geriatric population. Dysphagia. 2009;1:1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Roy N, Stemple J, Merrill RM, Thomas L. Dysphagia in the elderly: preliminary evidence of prevalence, risk factors, and socioemotional effects. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2007;11:858–65.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bloem BR, Lagaay AM, van Beek W, Haan J, Roos RA, Wintzen AR. Prevalence of subjective dysphagia in community residents aged over 87. BMJ. 1990;6726:721–2.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Yang EJ, Kim MH, Lim J, Paik N. Oropharyngeal dysphagia in a community-based elderly cohort: The Korean longitudinal study on health and aging. J Korean Med Sci. 2013;10:1534–9.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kikawada M, Iwamoto T, Takasaki M. Aspiration and infection in the elderly. Drugs Aging. 2005;2:115–30.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Holland G, Jayasekeran V, Pendleton N, Horan M, Jones M, Hamdy S. Prevalence and symptom profiling of oropharyngeal dysphagia in a community dwelling of an elderly population: a self-reporting questionnaire survey. Dis Esophagus. 2011;7:476–80.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Altman KW, Yu G, Schaefer SD. Consequence of dysphagia in the hospitalized patient: impact on prognosis and hospital resources. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010;8:784–9.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Robbins J, Gangnon RE, Theis SM, Kays SA, Hewitt AL, Hind JA. The effects of lingual exercise on swallowing in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;9:1483–9.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nagai H, Russell JA, Jackson MA, Connor NP. Effect of aging on tongue protrusion forces in rats. Dysphagia. 2008;2:116–21.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ota F, Connor NP, Konopacki R. Alterations in contractile properties of tongue muscles in old rats. Annal Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2005;10:799–803.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Butler SG, Stuart A, Leng X, Wilhelm E, Rees C, Williamson J, Kritchevsky SB. The relationship of aspiration status with tongue and handgrip strength in healthy older adults. J Gerontol Ser A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2011;4:452–8.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Feng X, Todd T, Lintzenich CR, Ding J, Carr JJ, Ge Y, Browne JD, Kritchevsky SB, Butler SG. Aging-related geniohyoid muscle atrophy is related to aspiration status in healthy older adults. J Gerontol Ser A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2013;7:853–60.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Leonard R, Kendall KA, McKenzie S. Structural displacements affecting pharyngeal constriction in nondysphagic elderly and nonelderly adults. Dysphagia. 2004;2:133–41.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kendall KA, Leonard RJ. Pharyngeal constriction in elderly dysphagic patients compared with young and elderly nondysphagic controls. Dysphagia. 2001;4:272–8.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Aminpour S, Leonard R, Fuller SC, Belafsky PC. Pharyngeal wall differences between normal younger and older adults. ENT. 2011;4:1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Molfenter SM, Amin M, Branski RC, Brumm J, Hagiwara M, Roof S, Lazarus CL. Age-related changes in pharyngeal lumen size: a retrospective MRI analysis. Dysphagia. 2015;3:321–7.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Inamoto Y, Saitoh E, Okada S, Kagaya H, Shibata S, Baba M, Onogi K, Hashimoto S, Katada K, Wattanapan P. Anatomy of the larynx and pharynx: effects of age, gender and height revealed by multidetector computed tomography. J Oral Rehabil. 2015;9:670–7.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dejaeger E, Pelemans W, Ponette E, Joosten E. Mechanisms involved in postdeglutition retention in the elderly. Dysphagia. 1997;2:63–7.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Frederick MG, Ott DJ, Grishaw EK, Gelfand DW, Chen MYM. Functional abnormalities of the pharynx: a prospective analysis of radiographic abnormalities relative to age and symptoms. Am J Roentgenol. 1996;2:353–7.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rofes L, Arreola V, Romea M, Palomera E, Almirall J, Cabré M, Serra-Prat M, Clavé P. Pathophysiology of oropharyngeal dysphagia in the frail elderly. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2010;8:851-858+e230.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kamal I. Test-retest validity of acoustic pharyngometry measurements. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;2:223–8.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Brooks LJ, Byard PJ, Fouke JM, Strohl KP. Reproducibility of measurements of upper airway area by acoustic reflection. J Appl Physiol. 1989;6:2901–5.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Marshall I, Maran NJ, Martin S, Jan MA, Rimmington JE, Best JJK, Drummond GB, Douglas NJ. Acoustic reflectometry for airway measurements in man: implementation and validation. Physiol Meas. 1993;2:157–69.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hoffstein V, Fredberg JJ. The acoustic reflection technique for non-invasive assessment of upper airway area. Eur Respir J. 1991;5:602–11.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Fredberg JJ, Wohl MEB, Glass GM, Dorkin HL. Airway area by acoustic reflections measured at the mouth. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1980;5:749–58.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Bradley TD, Brown IG, Grossman RF, Zamel N, Martinez D, Phillipson EA, Hoffstein V. Pharyngeal size in snorers, nonsnorers, and patients with obstructive sleep apnea. N Engl J Med. 1986;21:1327–31.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Viviano JS. Acoustic reflection: review and clinical applications for sleep-disordered breathing. Sleep Breath. 2002;3:129–49.

    Google Scholar 

  30. D’Urzo AD, Rubinstein I, Lawson VG, Vassal KP, Rebuck AS, Slutsky AS, Hoffstein V. Comparison of glottic areas measured by acoustic reflections vs. computerized tomography. J Appl Physiol. 1988;1:367–70.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Molfenter SM. The reliability of oral and pharyngeal dimensions captured with acoustic pharyngometry. Dysphagia. 2016;4:555–9.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Nicosia MA, Hind JA, Roecker EB, Carnes M, Doyle J, Dengel GA, Robbins J. Age effects on the temporal evolution of isometric and swallowing pressure. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2000;11:M634–40.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Youmans SR, Youmans GL, Stierwalt JA. Differences in tongue strength across age and gender: is there a diminished strength reserve? Dysphagia. 2009;1:57–65.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Stierwalt JA, Youmans SR. Tongue measures in individuals with normal and impaired swallowing. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2007;2:148–56.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Belafsky PC, Mouadeb DA, Rees CJ, Pryor JC, Postma GN, Allen J, Leonard RJ. Validity and reliability of the eating assessment tool (EAT-10). Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2008;12:919–24.

    Google Scholar 

  36. DePippo KL, Holas MA, Reding MJ. Validation of the 3-oz water swallow test for aspiration following stroke. Arch Neurol. 1992;12:1259–61.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J, Seeman T, Tracy R, Kop WJ, Burke G, McBurnie MA, Cardiovascular Health Study Collaborative Research Group. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;3:M146–56.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Vorperian HK: VTLab Acoustic Pharyngometry (APh) Protocol: Data collection (Part I) & data analysis (Part II) 09/09, 2013.

  39. D’Urzo AD, Lawson VG, Vassal KP, Rebuck AS, Slutsky AS, Hoffstein V. Airway area by acoustic response measurements and computerized tomography. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1987;2:392–5.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Fink TA, Ross JB. Are we testing a true thin liquid? Dysphagia. 2009;3:285–9.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Molfenter SM, Steele CM. Variation in temporal measures of swallowing: sex and volume effects. Dysphagia. 2013;2:226–33.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;7:671.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Rosenbek JC, Robbins JA, Roecker EB, Coyle JL, Wood JL. A penetration-aspiration scale. Dysphagia. 1996;2:93–8.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Stokely SL, Peladeau-Pigeon M, Leigh C, Molfenter SM, Steele CM. The relationship between pharyngeal constriction and post-swallow residue. Dysphagia. 2015;30:349–56.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Leonard R, Rees CJ, Belafsky P, Allen J. Fluoroscopic surrogate for pharyngeal strength: the pharyngeal constriction ratio (PCR). Dysphagia. 2011;1:13–7.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Olsson R, Castell J, Johnston B, Ekberg O, Castell DO. Combined videomanometric identification of abnormalities related to pharyngeal retention. Acad Radiol. 1997;5:349–54.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Kahrilas PJ, Logemann JA, Lin S, Ergun GA. Pharyngeal clearance during swallowing: a combined manometric and videofluoroscopic study. Gastroenterology. 1992;1:128–36.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Molfenter SM, Hsu CY, Lu Y, Lazarus CL. Alterations to swallowing physiology as the result of effortful swallowing in healthy seniors. Dysphagia. 2018;33:380–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Pearson WG Jr, Molfenter SM, Smith ZM, Steele CM. Image-based measurement of post-swallow residue: the normalized residue ratio scale. Dysphagia. 2013;2:167–77.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Fleiss JL. The design and analysis of clinical experiments. New York: Wiley; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Allen JE, White CJ, Leonard RJ, Belafsky PC. Prevalence of penetration and aspiration on videofluoroscopy in normal individuals without dysphagia. Dysphagia. 2010;4:347–8.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Daggett A, Logemann J, Rademaker A, Pauloski B. Laryngeal penetration during deglutition in normal subjects of various ages. Dysphagia. 2006;4:270–4.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Sporns PB, Muhle P, Hanning U, Suntrup-Krueger S, Schwindt W, Eversmann J, Warnecke T, Wirth R, Zimmer S, Dziewas R. Atrophy of swallowing muscles is associated with severity of dysphagia and age in patients with acute stroke. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017;18(7):635-e1.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Nativ-Zeltzer N, Logemann JA, Zecker SG, Kahrilas PJ. Pressure topography metrics for high-resolution pharyngeal-esophageal manofluorography-a normative study of younger and older adults. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016;5:721–31.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Stokely S, Molfenter SM, Leigh C, Peladeau-Pigeon M, Steele CM. The relationship between pharyngeal constriction and post-swallow residue. Abstract, Dysphagia Research Society Meeting. Dysphagia. 2014;6:737.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Molfenter SM, Steele CM. Use of an anatomical scalar to control for sex-based size differences in measures of hyoid excursion during swallowing. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2014;3:768–78.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Erica Herzberg, Danielle Brates, Mehak Noorani, Emily Ottinger, Shelby Norman, Il Young Jung, Julie Bancroft, Wendy Liang, Chelsea Sandler, Marina Casale, and Katrin Gabriel for their assistance during data collection and data analysis and Chuan-Ya Hsu and Ying Lu for statistical consultation.

Funding

This study was funded by NIH National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders 1R21DC015067.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sonja M. Molfenter.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Molfenter, S.M., Lenell, C. & Lazarus, C.L. Volumetric Changes to the Pharynx in Healthy Aging: Consequence for Pharyngeal Swallow Mechanics and Function. Dysphagia 34, 129–137 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-018-9924-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-018-9924-5

Keywords

Navigation