Abstract
Purposes
To assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (SRs) or meta-analysis concerning the predictive value of ERCC1 in platinum chemotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer.
Methods
We searched the PubMed, EMbase, Cochrane library, international prospective register of systematic reviews, Chinese BioMedical Literature Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wan Fang and VIP database for SRs or meta-analysis. The methodological quality of included literatures was evaluated by risk of bias in systematic review (ROBIS) scale.
Results
Nineteen eligible SRs/meta-analysis were included. The most frequently searched databases were EMbase (74%), PubMed, Medline and CNKI. Fifteen SRs did additional retrieval manually, but none of them retrieved the registration platform. 47% described the two-reviewers model in the screening for eligible original articles, and seven SRs described the two reviewers to extract data. In methodological quality assessment, inter-rater reliability Kappa was 0.87 between two reviewers. Research question were well related to all SRs in phase 1 and the eligibility criteria was suitable for each SR, and rated as ‘low’ risk bias. But the ‘high’ risk bias existed in all the SRs regarding methods used to identify and/or select studies, and data collection and study appraisal. More than two-third of SRs or meta-analysis were finished with high risk of bias in the synthesis, findings and the final phase.
Conclusions
The study demonstrated poor methodological quality of SRs/meta-analysis assessing the predictive value of ERCC1 in chemotherapy among the NSCLC patients, especially the high performance bias. Registration or publishing the protocol is recommended in future research.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Booton R, Ward T, Ashcroft L, Morris J, Heighway J, Thatcher N (2007) ERCC1 mRNA expression is not associated with response and survival after platinum-based chemotherapy regimens in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2(10):902–906
Buhn S, Mathes T, Prengel P et al (2017) The risk of bias in systematic reviews (ROBIS) tool showed fair reliability and good construct validity. J Clin Epidemiol. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.019
Cecere F, Bria E, Rosell R (2006) DNA repair by ERCC1 in non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 355(24):2590–2591 (Author reply 1)
Chen S, Zhang J, Wang R, Luo X, Chen H (2010) The platinum-based treatments for advanced non-small cell lung cancer, is low/negative ERCC1 expression better than high/positive ERCC1 expression? A meta-analysis. Lung Cancer 70(1):63–70. doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2010.05.010 (Epub Jun 11)
Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD et al (2016) Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin 66(2):115–132
De Angelis C, Drazen JM, Frizelle FA et al (2004) Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. CMAJ 171(6):606–607
Fenghua X, Rongrong G, Xin L, Liyan L, Zhang G (2013) Relationship between ERCC1 expression and sensitivity of platinum-based chemotherapy in NSCLC: a systematic review. Chin J Clin Pharmacol Ther 18(1):45–50
Ghoussaini M, Fletcher O, Michailidou K et al (2012) Genome-wide association analysis identifies three new breast cancer susceptibility loci. Nat Genet 44(3):312–318
Han Y, Liu J, Sun M, Zhang Z, Liu C, Sun Y (2016) A significant statistical advancement on the predictive values of ERCC1 polymorphisms for clinical outcomes of platinum-based chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: an updated meta-analysis. Dis Mark 2016:7643981. doi:10.1155/2016/7643981 (Epub 2016 Jan 21)
Hubner RA, Riley RD, Billingham LJ, Popat S (2011) Excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1) status and lung cancer outcomes: a meta-analysis of published studies and recommendations. PLoS One 6(10):e25164. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0025164 (Epub 2011 Oct 14)
Jameson JL, Longo DL (2015) Precision medicine—personalized, problematic, and promising. N Engl J Med 372(23):2229–2234
Jiang J, Liang X, Zhou X, Huang R, Chu Z, Zhan Q (2012) ERCC1 expression as a prognostic and predictive factor in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis. Mol Biol Rep 39(6):6933–6942. doi:10.1007/s11033-012-1520-4
Jiang LI, Kai SU, Yao HUANG et al (2016) Lung cancer screening: an overview of systematic reviews. Chin J Evid-based Med 16(7):764–770
Levine DM, Ek WE, Zhang R et al (2013) A genome-wide association study identifies new susceptibility loci for esophageal adenocarcinoma and Barrett’s esophagus. Nat Genet 45(12):1487–1493
Li Z, Qing Y, Guan W et al (2014) Predictive value of APE1, BRCA1, ERCC1 and TUBB3 expression in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving first-line platinum–paclitaxel chemotherapy. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 74(4):777–786. doi:10.1007/s00280-014-2562-1 (Epub 2014 Aug 9)
Li F, Xie X, Ren X, Zhang J (2016) A meta-analysis identifies ERCC1 gene polymorphism as a predictor of better patient response to treatment with radiochemotherapy. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 77(6):1183–1191
Michailidou K, Beesley J, Lindstrom S et al (2015) Genome-wide association analysis of more than 120,000 individuals identifies 15 new susceptibility loci for breast cancer. Nat Genet 47(4):373–380
NSCLC Meta-analyses Collaborative Group (2010) Adjuvant chemotherapy, with or without postoperative radiotherapy, in operable non-small-cell lung cancer: two meta-analyses of individual patient data. Lancet 375(9722):1267–1277
Olaussen KA, Dunant A, Fouret P et al (2006) DNA repair by ERCC1 in non-small-cell lung cancer and cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy. N Engl J Med 355(10):983–991
Ozdemir O, Ozdemir P, Veral A, Uluer H, Ozhan MH (2013) ERCC1 expression does not predict survival and treatment response in advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer cases treated with platinum based chemotherapy. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 14(8):4679–4683
Paliogiannis P, Attene F, Cossu A et al (2013) Lung cancer epidemiology in North Sardinia, Italy. Multidiscip Respir Med 8(1):45
Pignon J, Tribodet H, Scagliotti G (2008) Lung adjuvant cisplatin evaluation: a pooled analysis by the LACE Collaborative Group. J Clin Oncol 26(210):3552–3559
Qian J, Gang J, Wang Y (2012) Meta-analysis of correlation between ERCC1 expression and efficacy of platinum-based chemotherapy in non-small lung cancer patients. Chin J Cancer Prev Treat 19(2):123–126
Roth JA, Carlson JJ (2011) Prognostic role of ERCC1 in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Lung Cancer 12(6):393–401. doi:10.1016/j.cllc.2011.04.005 (Epub Jul 1)
Song Yong, Ying Wu, Shen P (2009) A meta-analysis of ERCC1 SNP and chemosensitivity to cisplatin in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. J Evid-Based Med 4(2):98–100
The International Adjuvant Lung Cancer Trial Collaborative Group (2004) Cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with completely resected non–small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 350(4):351–360
Wei S, Shi Y, Yong S (2010) Meta-analysis of predictive value of ERCC1 protein expression in non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy. J Evid-Based Med 6:20
Wei SZ, Zhan P, Shi MQ et al (2011a) Predictive value of ERCC1 and XPD polymorphism in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer receiving platinum-based chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Oncol 28(1):315–321. doi:10.1007/s12032-010-9443-1 (Epub 2010 Feb 9)
Wei HB, Lu XS, Shang LH et al (2011b) Polymorphisms of ERCC1 C118T/C8092A and MDR1 C3435T predict outcome of platinum-based chemotherapies in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis. Arch Med Res 42(5):412–420. doi:10.1016/j.arcmed.2011.07.008 (Epub Aug 7)
Wei HB, Hu J, Shang LH et al (2012) A meta-analytic review of ERCC1/MDR1 polymorphism and chemosensitivity to platinum in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Chin Med J (Engl) 125(16):2902–2907
Wellcome Trust Case Control C (2007) Genome-wide association study of 14,000 cases of seven common diseases and 3,000 shared controls. Nature 447(7145):661–678
Whiting P, Savovic J, Higgins JP et al (2016) ROBIS: a new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed. J Clin Epidemiol 69:225–234
Wilcox JE (2006) DNA repair by ERCC1 in non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 355(24):2590 (Author reply 1)
Wu C, Hu Z, He Z et al (2011) Genome-wide association study identifies three new susceptibility loci for esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma in Chinese populations. Nat Genet 43(7):679–684
Wu C, Wang Z, Song X et al (2014) Joint analysis of three genome-wide association studies of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in Chinese populations. Nat Genet 46(9):1001–1006
Xu TP, Shen H, Liu LX, Shu YQ (2013) Association of ERCC1-C118T and -C8092A polymorphisms with lung cancer risk and survival of advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy: a pooled analysis based on 39 reports. Gene 526(2):265–274. doi:10.1016/j.gene.2013.05.021 (Epub May 30)
Yang Y, Xian L (2014) The association between the ERCC1/2 polymorphisms and the clinical outcomes of the platinum-based chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Tumour Biol 35(4):2905–2921. doi:10.1007/s13277-013-1493-5 (Epub 2013 Dec 13)
Yang Y, Luo X, Yang N, Feng R, Xian L (2014) The prognostic value of excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1) in patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) receiving platinum-based chemotherapy: evidence from meta-analysis. PLoS One 9(11):e111651
Yin M, Yan J, Voutsina A et al (2011) No evidence of an association of ERCC1 and ERCC2 polymorphisms with clinical outcomes of platinum-based chemotherapies in non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis. Lung Cancer 72(3):370–377. doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2010.10.011 (Epub Nov 13)
Yu D, Shi J, Sun T et al (2012) Pharmacogenetic role of ERCC1 genetic variants in treatment response of platinum-based chemotherapy among advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients. Tumour Biol 33(3):877–884. doi:10.1007/s13277-011-0314-y (Epub 2012 Jan 17)
Yu SN, Liu GF, Li XF, Fu BH, Dong LX, Zhang SH (2017) Evaluation of prediction of polymorphisms of DNA repair genes on the efficacy of platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a network meta-analysis. J Cell Biochem. doi:10.1002/jcb.26147
Acknowledgements
We greatly appreciate the support from other members of the study team who provided their generous contribution of time and efforts help during the study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Funding
This study was not funded by any funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors. All the data involved in this study were extracted from published articles.
Informed consent
Informed consent was not involved since all the data in this study were extracted from published articles.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tao, H., Zhang, Y., Li, Q. et al. Methodological quality evaluation of systematic reviews or meta-analyses on ERCC1 in non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 143, 2245–2256 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-017-2516-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-017-2516-1