Abstract
The mammillary bodies (MBs) are classically defined as a pair of small round structures located on the undersurface of the diencephalon. The systematic observation of MR brain images of patients with neurological diseases, but also of healthy subjects enrolled in research protocols, reveals, however, a greater anatomical variability. The aim of the present study was to define the spectrum of such variability using spatial normalized 3D TFE T1-weighted MR images in a group of 151 healthy right-handed young subjects (78 females, age range 16–39 years). The MBs were identified on reformatted coronal and axial images and classified according to morphological, positional and numerical criteria. On the basis of coronal images, MBs were first divided into symmetrical (86.1 %) and asymmetrical (13.9 %), depending on their respective height. Symmetrical MBs were further subdivided into three variants [type A (2.7 %), B (76.2 %), C (7.3 %)] according to the depth of the intermammillary sulcus. Two morphological variants were defined on axial images, depending on whether the MBs were circular (63.6 %) or elliptic (36.4 %). This latter group was further divided in two subgroups, depending on whether the MBs were parallel (21.9 %) or convergent (14.6 %). Finally, two subjects (1.3 %) presented a supernumeral MB. The transverse size of the third ventricle was greater in the type A compared to the type B and C groups. Gender did not significantly affect the frequency of MBs variants, except for the three symmetrical subgroups in which the variants A and C were more frequent in males than in females. These findings suggest the presence of an anatomical variability of the MBs, in contrast to their classical definition. Therefore, atypical presentation of MBs can be the expression of this variability rather than a marker of neurological disorders (i.e. cerebral malformation, mesial temporal sclerosis, Wernicke–Korsakoff syndrome).
References
Bernstein HG, Krause S, Krell D, Dobrowolny H, Wolter M, Stauch R, Ranft K, Danos P, Jirikowski GF, Bogerts B (2007) Strongly reduced number of parvalbumin-immunoreactive projection neurons in the mammillary bodies in schizophrenia: further evidence for limbic neuropathology. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1096:120–127
Callen DJ, Black SE, Gao F, Caldwell CB, Szalai JP (2001) Beyond the hippocampus: MRI volumetry confirms widespread limbic atrophy in AD. Neurology 57:1669–1674
Copenhaver BR, Rabin LA, Saykin AJ, Roth RM, Wishart HA, Flashman LA, Santulli RB, McHugh TL, Mamourian AC (2006) The fornix and mammillary bodies in older adults with Alzheimer's disease, mild cognitive impairment, and cognitive complaints: a volumetric MRI study. Psychiatry Res 147(2–3):93–103
Freeman JL (2003) The anatomy and embryology of the hypothalamus in relation to hypothalamic hamartomas. Epileptic Disord 5:177–186
Gallucci M, Bozzao A, Splendiani A, Masciocchi C, Passariello R (1990) Wernicke encephalopathy: MR findings in five patients. AJNR 11:887–892
Hahn JS, Barnes PD (2010) Neuroimaging advances in holoprosencephaly: refining the spectrum of the midline malformation. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 154C(1):120–132
Iversen S, Kupfermann I, Kandel ER (2000) Emotional states and feelings. In: Kandel ER, Schwartz JH, Jessel TM (eds) Principles of neural sciences, 4th edn. McGraw Hill, USA, pp 986–988
Jones EG (2011) Mamillary or Mammillary? What’s in an “m”? J Hist Neurosci 20:152–159
Kodama F, Ogawa T, Sugihara S, Kamba M, Kohaya N, Kondo S, Kinoshita T (2003) Transneuronal degeneration in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy: evaluation by MR imaging. Eur Radiol 13:2180–2185
Kumar R, Birrer BV, Macey PM, Woo MA, Gupta RK, Yan-Go FL, Harper RM (2008) Reduced mammillary body volume in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Neurosci Lett 438:330–334
Kumar MP, Kumar YS, Anand SV, Kumar SJ, Upreti P, Singh R, Kishore SRR, Kumar GR (2009a) Mammillary body atrophy in acute liver failure and acute-on-chronic liver failure of nonalcoholic etiology. Metab Brain Dis 24:361–371
Kumar R, Woo MA, Birrer BV, Macey PM, Fonarow GC, Hamilton MA, Harper RM (2009b) Mammillary bodies and fornix fibers are injured in heart failure. Neurobiol Dis 33:236–242
Mamourian AC, Rodichok L, Towfighi J (1995) The asymmetric mamillary body: association with medial temporal lobe disease demonstrated with MR. AJNR 16:517–522
Ozturk A, Yousem DM, Mahmood A, El Sayed S (2008) Prevalence of asymmetry of mamillary body and fornix size on MR imaging. AJNR 29:384–387
Pittella JE, Maciel ST (1985) Partial fusion of the mamillary bodies. Case study and review of congenital anomalies of these structures. Arch Pathol Lab Med 109:567–568
Staurenghi C (1983) Corpi mammillari laterali nel cervello umano. Atti dell’Associazione medica lombarda
Talairach J, Tournoux P (1988) Co-planar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain. Thieme Medical Publisher, New York
Testut L (1920) Sistema Nervoso. In: Anatomia Umana. Unione Tipografico-Editrice Torinese, pp 356–357
Trinka E, Rauscher C, Nagler M, Moroder T, Ladurner G, Irnberger E, Sperl W, Pilz P (2001) A case of Ohtahara syndrome with olivary-dentate dysplasia and agenesis of mamillary bodies. Epilepsia 42:950–953
Yucel K, Hakyemez B, Parlak M, Oygucu IH (2002) Morphometry of some elements of limbic system in normal population: a quantitative MRI study. Neuroanatomy 1:15–21
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tagliamonte, M., Sestieri, C., Romani, G.L. et al. MRI anatomical variants of mammillary bodies. Brain Struct Funct 220, 85–90 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-013-0639-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-013-0639-y