Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The tibialis anterior response revisited

  • Original Communication
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The idiomuscular response to direct percussion is rarely tested nowadays because of its uncertain mechanism and significance. While performing neurological examination, we observed a brisk ankle dorsiflexion response on direct muscle percussion of m. tibialis anterior in patients with acute inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (AIDP). In contrast, in patients with upper motor neuron lesions, an ankle inversion response was seen. In this article we describe our findings in patients with bilateral lower limb weakness. We assessed 73 consecutive patients with bilateral lower limb weakness. A strong dorsiflexion response to percussion of m. tibialis anterior was seen in 11 out of 14 patients with AIDP (sensitivity 78.6 %). None of the other patients showed a strong dorsiflexion response (specificity 100 %). An inversion response was seen in 11 out of 13 patients with UMN involvement (sensitivity 92.3 %). It was also noted in two of 46 patients without proven UMN involvement (specificity 96.7 %). The idiomuscular response to percussion of m. tibialis anterior can be useful in the assessment of patients with lower limb weakness of unclear cause.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schiff DJM (1858) Lehrbuch der Physiologie des Menschen. Verlag von M. Schauenburg & C, Lahr

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gowers WR (1881) The diagnosis of diseases of the spinal cord. J & A Churchill, London

    Google Scholar 

  3. Patel AN, Swami RK (1969) Muscle percussion and neostigmine test in the clinical evaluation of neuromuscular disorders. N Engl J Med 281:523–526. doi:10.1056/NEJM196909042811004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ropper AH, Wijdicks EFM, Truax BT (1991) Guillain–Barré syndrome. Oxford University Press, USA

    Google Scholar 

  5. Magistris MR, Kohler A (1996) Contraction response to muscle percussion is increased in peripheral nerve conduction block. Neurology 47:1243–1246

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hadden RDM, Cornblath DR, Hughes RAC et al (1998) Electrophysiological classification of Guillain–Barré syndrome: clinical associations and outcome. Ann Neurol 44:780–788. doi:10.1002/ana.410440512

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hughes R, Cornblath D (2005) Guillain–Barre syndrome. Lancet 366(1653–66):8

    Google Scholar 

  8. de Carvalho M, Dengler R, Eisen A et al (2008) Electrodiagnostic criteria for diagnosis of ALS. Clin Neurophysiol 119:497–503. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2007.09.143

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hughes RAC, Bouche P, Cornblath DR et al (2006) European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society guideline on management of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: report of a joint task force of the European Federation of Neurological Societies and the Peripheral Nerve Society. Eur J Neurol 13:326–332. doi:10.1111/j.1468-1331.2006.01278.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Brody IA, Rozear MP (1970) Contraction response to muscle percussion physiology and clinical significance. Arch Neurol 23:259–265

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kiernan MC, Guglielmi J-M, Kaji R et al (2002) Evidence for axonal membrane hyperpolarization in multifocal motor neuropathy with conduction block. Brain 125:664–675

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mayer NH, Esquenazi A (2003) Muscle overactivity and movement dysfunction in the upper motoneuron syndrome. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 14:855–883 (vii–viii)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Emeritus Professor Mervyn Eadie for his valuable contributions to this article.

Conflicts of interest

Alexander Lehn: none, Sasha Dionisio: none, Caroline Airey: none, Helen Brown: none, Stefan Blum: none, Robert Henderson: none.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander C. Lehn.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lehn, A.C., Dionisio, S., Airey, C.A. et al. The tibialis anterior response revisited. J Neurol 261, 1340–1343 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-014-7329-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-014-7329-4

Keywords

Navigation