Correction to: International Journal of Legal Medicine (2019)
The published version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake. The description `(SEE ±7304 years) and the most accurate age model based on multiple regression model was found to be with bilateral first molar teeth (SEE ±7413 years)` should be changed as `(SEE ±7.304 years) and the most accurate age model based on multiple regression model was found to be with bilateral first molar teeth (SEE ±7.413 years) in abstract section.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The online version of the original article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-019-02188-w
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gok, E., Fedakar, R. & Mustafa Kafa, I. Correction to: Usability of dental pulp visibility and tooth coronal index in digital panoramic radiography in age estimation in the forensic medicine. Int J Legal Med 134, 1265 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-019-02218-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-019-02218-7