Skip to main content
Log in

Visualisation of the temporary cavity by computed tomography using contrast material

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Legal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The temporary cavity of a missile produces radial tears in ordnance gelatine, which correlate to the energy transfer. Computed tomography is a useful and non-destructive method to examine gelatine blocks. However, the tears give only few radiocontrast by air filling, which decreases with the time past shooting. Therefore, systematically, a radiocontrast material was searched to enhance the contrast. Different contrast materials were amalgamated to acryl paint, and about 7 g was sealed in a foil bag, which was integrated in the front of a standard 10% gelatine cylinder. Shots with Action-5 expanding bullets were performed from a 5-m distance. Gelatine was scanned by multi-slice computed tomography. The multiplanar reconstructed images were compared to mechanically cut slices of 1 cm thickness. It was shown experimentally that iodine containing water-soluble contrast material did not give sufficient contrast and caused diffusion artefacts. Best results were obtained by barium sulphate emulsion. The amount of acryl paint was sufficient to colour the tears for optical scanning. The radiocontrast of barium leads to satisfying imaging of tears and allowed the creation of a three-dimensional reconstruction of the temporary cavity. Comparison of optical and radiological results showed an excellent correlation, but absolute measures in computed tomographic (CT) images remained lower compared with optically gathered values in the gelatine slices. Combination of paint and contrast material for CT examination will facilitate the evaluation of complex ballistic models and increase accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fackler ML, Malinowski JA (1985) The wound profile: a visual method for quantifying gunshot wound components. J Trauma 25:522–529

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fackler ML (1987) What’s wrong with the wound ballistics literature, and why. Letterman Army Institute of Research, Report No 239, July 1987

  3. Korac Z, Kelenc D, Baskot A, Mikulic D, Hancevic J (2001) Substitute ellipse of the permanent cavity in gelatine blocks and debridement of gunshot wounds. Mil Med 166:689–694

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fackler ML, Surinchak JS, Malinowski JA, Bowen RE (1984) Wounding potential of the Russian AK-74 assault rifle. J Trauma 24(3):263–266

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fackler ML, Malinowski JA (1988) Ordnance gelatin for ballistic studies. Detrimental effect of excess heat used in gelatin preparation. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 9:218–219

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Jeffery AJ, Rutty GN, Robinson C, Morgan B (2008) Computed tomography of projectile injuries. Clin Radiol 63:1160–1166

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Korac Z, Kelenc D, Hancevic J, Baskot A, Mikulic D (2002) The application of computed tomography in the analysis of permanent cavity: a new method in terminal ballistics. Acta Clin Croat 41:205–209

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bolliger SA, Thali MJ, Bolliger MJ, Kneubuehl BP (2010) Gunshot energy transfer profile in ballistic gelatine, determined with computed tomography using the total crack length method. Int J Leg Med 124:613–616, Epub 2010 Aug 20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Harcke HT, Levy AD, Getz JM, Robinson SR (2008) MDCT analysis of projectile injury in forensic investigation. Am J Roentgenol 190(2):W106–W111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Schyma C (2010) Colour contrast in ballistic gelatine. Forensic Sci Int 197:114–118

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Schyma C, Madea B (2010) Schussspurensicherung-Praktischer Umgang mit Schuss-und Schmauchspuren. Rechtsmedizin 20:123–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Stein KM, Grünberg K (2009) Forensische radiologie. Radiologe 49:73–85

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Thali MJ, Yen K, Vock P, Ozdoba C, Kneubuehl BP, Sonnenschein M, Dirnhofer R (2003) Image-guided virtual autopsy findings of gunshot victims performed with multi-slice computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging and subsequent correlation between radiology and autopsy findings. Forensic Sci Int 138:8–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Stein KM, Bahner ML, Merkel J, Ain S, Mattern R (2000) Detection of gunshot residues in routine CTs. Int J Leg Med 114:15–18

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cecchetto G, Giraudo C, Amagliani A, Viel G, Fais P, Cavarzeran F, Feltrin G, Ferrara SD, Montisci M (2010) Estimation of the firing distance through micro-CT analysis of gunshot wounds. Int J Leg Med 125(2):245–251

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rutty GN, Boyce P, Robinson CE, Jeffery AJ, Morgan B (2008) The role of computed tomography in terminal ballistic analysis. Int J Leg Med 122(1):1–5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Schyma.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schyma, C., Hagemeier, L., Greschus, S. et al. Visualisation of the temporary cavity by computed tomography using contrast material. Int J Legal Med 126, 37–42 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-010-0546-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-010-0546-1

Keywords

Navigation