Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Biomechanics of the female pelvic floor: a prospective trail of the alteration of force–displacement-vectors in parous and nulliparous women

  • General Gynecology
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

We hypothesize that the holistic and multiplanar depiction of pelvic floor structures by dynamic MRI is of particular value in rendering information about the extent of functional changes that can lead to pelvic floor dysfunction.

Methods

134 women were prospectively included for assessment of their pelvic floor function.

Results

Study groups differed significantly in the direction of their force–displacement-vectors. A shift from ventral to dorsal is present depending on parity, mode of delivery and age. Maternal age and body height correlated to the force–displacement-vector, whereas maternal weight did not. Pressing direction proved to be dependent on the inclination of the pelvis and the aperture of the levator hiatus while remaining independent from the aperture of the abdominal wall.

Conclusion

Biomechanical data interpretation uncovered the pathogenetic relevance of progressive retroflection of the force–displacement-vector. This is responsible for the onset of a vicious cycle of trauma-related force deflection perpetuating pelvic floor traumatization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anthuber C, Dannecker C, Hepp H (2000) Vaginale Geburt: Morphologische und funktionelle Veränderungen am Beckenboden. Einfluss auf den Blasenverschluss und die Analsphinkterfunktion Gynäkologe 33:857–863

    Google Scholar 

  2. South M, Stinnett S, Sanders DB, Weidner AC (2009) Levator ani denervation and reinnervation 6 months after childbirth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 200(5):519.e1–519.e7

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sze EH, Hobbs G (2009) Relation between vaginal birth and pelvic organ prolapse. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 88(2):200–203

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Zetterström JP, López A, Anzén B, Dolk A, Norman M, Mellgren A (1999) Anal incontinence after vaginal delivery: a prospective study in primiparous women. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 106(4):324–330

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tjandra JJ, Chan MK, Kwok SY, Yeh CH, Tan JJ, Sloane K et al (2008) Predictive factors for faecal incontinence after third or fourth degree obstetric tears: a clinico-physiologic study. Colorectal Dis 10(7):681–688

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Baumann P, Hammoud AO, McNeeley SG, DeRose E, Kudish B, Hendrix S (2007) Factors associated with anal sphincter laceration in 40, 923 primiparous women. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 18(9):985–990

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Thomas JM, Bartram CI (1993) Anal-sphincter disruption during vaginal delivery. N Engl J Med 329(26):1905–1911

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Samuelsson EC, Victor FT, Tibblin G, Svärdsudd KF (1999) Signs of genital prolapse in a Swedish population of women 20–59 years of age and possible related factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180(2 Pt1):299–305

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lienemann A, Sprenger D, Janssen U, Grosch E, Pellengahr C, Anthuber C (2004) Assessment of pelvic organ descent by use of functional cine-MRI: which reference line should be used? Neurourol Urodyn 23(1):33–37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lienemann A, Fischer T, Anthuber C, Reiser M (2003) Functional MRI of the pelvic floor: postpartum changes of primiparous women after spontaneous vaginal delivery. Rofo 175(8):1100–1105

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lienemann A, Sprenger D, Janssen U, Anthuber C, Reiser M (2000) Functional MRI of the pelvic floor. The methods and reference values. Radiologe 40(5):458–464

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lienemann A, Anthuber C, Baron A, Reiser M (2000) Diagnosing enteroceles using dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. Dis Colon Rectum 43(2):205–212

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Boyadzhyan L, Raman SS, Raz S (2008) Role of static and dynamic MR imaging in surgical pelvic floor dysfunction. Radiographics 28(4):949–967

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bø K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JO, Klarskov P et al (1996) The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175(1):10–17

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Grosch E. Funktionelle Magnetresonanztomograühie (MRT) und klonischer ICS-Score: Zwei verschiedene Befundungssysteme? Dissertation der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München. 2004

  16. Peschers U, Schaer G, Anthuber C, DeLancey JO, Schuessler B (1996) Changes in vesical neck mobility following vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol 88(6):1001–1006

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lienemann A, Anthuber C, Baron A, Kohz P, Reiser M (1997) Dynamic MR colpocystorectography assessing pelvic-floor descent. Eur J Radiol 78:1309–1317

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dannecker C, Lienemann A, Fischer T, Anthuber C (2004) Influence of spontaneous and instrumental vaginal delivery on objective measures of pelvic organ support: assessment with the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POPQ) technique and functional cine magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 115(1):32–38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rogers RG, Leeman LM, Migliaccio L, Albers LL (2008) Does the severity of spontaneous genital tract trauma affect postpartum pelvic floor function? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19(3):429–435

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Herrmann V, Scarpa K, Palma PC, Riccetto CZ (2009) Stress urinary incontinence 3 years after pregnancy: correlation to mode of delivery and parity. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20(3):281–288

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Diez-Itza I, Ibañez L, Arrue M, Paredes J, Murgiondo A, Sarasqueta C (2009) Influence of maternal weight on the new onset of stress urinary incontinence in pregnant women. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20(10):1259–1263

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fritsch H, Lienemann A, Brenner E, Ludwikowski B (2004) Clinical anatomy of the pelvic floor. Adv Anat Embryol Cell Biol 175:III–IX, 1–64

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gardosi J, Sylvester S, B-Lynch C (1989) Alternative positions in the second stage of labor: a randomized controlled trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 96(11):1290–1296

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Golay J, Vedam S, Sorger L (1993) The squatting position for the second stage of labor: effects on labor and on maternal and fetal well-being. Birth 20(2):73–78

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Habib FI, Corazziari E, Viscardi A, Badiali D, Torsoli A (1992) Role of body position, gender, and age on pelvic floor location and mobility. Dig Dis Sci 37(4):500–505

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. DeLancey JO, Hurd WW (1998) Size of the urogenital hiatus in the levator ani muscles in normal women and women with pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 91(3):364–368

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Wijma J, Tinga DJ, Visser GH (1991) Perineal ultrasonography in women with stress incontinence and controls: the role of the pelvic floor muscles. Gynecol Obstet Invest 32(3):176–179

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Wijma J, Weis Potters AE, de Wolf BT, Tinga DJ, Aarnoudse JG (2003) Anatomical and functional changes in the lower urinary tract following spontaneous delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 110(7):658–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Dietz HP, Clarke B, Herbison P (2002) Bladder neck mobility and urethral closure pressure as predictors of genuine stress incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 13(5):289–293

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Dietz H, Eldridge A, Grace M, Clarke B (2003) Does pregnancy affect pelvic organ mobility? Int Urogynecol J 14(S1):S6

    Google Scholar 

  31. Fusco MA, Martin RS, Chang MC (2001) Estimation of intra-abdominal pressure by bladder pressure measurement: validity and methodology. J Trauma 50(2):297–302

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Brubaker L, Saclarides T (1996) The female pelvic floor. F.A. Davis Company, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kruger J, Heap X, Murphy B, Dietz H (2008) Pelvic floor function in nulliparous women using 3-dimensional ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging. Obstet Gynecol 111:631–638

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. DeLancey J, Morgan D, Fenner D, Kearney R, Guire K, Miller J et al (2007) Comparison of levator ani muscle defects and function in women with and without pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 109(2):295–302

    Google Scholar 

  35. Dietz H, Simpson J (2008) Levator trauma is associated with pelvic organ prolapse. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 115:979–984

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Abdool Z, Shek K, Dietz H (2009) The effect of levator avulsion on hiatal dimensions and function. Am J Obstet Gynecol 201:89.e1–e5

    Google Scholar 

  37. Dietz H, Shek K, Clarke B (2005) Biometry of the pubovisceral muscle and levator hiatus by three-dimensional pelvic floor ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 25:580–585

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Yang J, Yang S, Huang W (2006) Biometry of the pubovisceral muscle and levator hiatus in nulliparous Chinese women. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 26:710–716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Majida M, Hoff BrÆkken I, Umek W, Bø K, Benth J, Ellstrom Engh M (2010) Interobserver repeatability of three- and four-dimensional transperineal ultrasound assessment of pelvic floor muscle anatomy and function. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 33(5):567–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Larsson C, Källen K, Andolf E (2009) Cesarean section and risk of pelvic organ prolapse: a nested case-control study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 200(3):243.e1–243.e4

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

The authors state that there exists no conflict of interest concerning the publication of the presented data/manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kiel University Hospital, Christian-Albrechts-University, Arnold-Heller-Strasse 3, Building 24, 24105, Kiel, Germany

    Carolin Strauss, Maret Bauer, Walter Jonat & Alexander Strauss

  2. Clinic for Diagnostic Radiology, Landshut, Germany

    Andreas Lienemann

  3. Department of Surgery, Munich University Hospital, Grosshadern, Germany

    Fritz Spelsberg

Authors
  1. Carolin Strauss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andreas Lienemann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Fritz Spelsberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Maret Bauer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Walter Jonat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Alexander Strauss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carolin Strauss.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Strauss, C., Lienemann, A., Spelsberg, F. et al. Biomechanics of the female pelvic floor: a prospective trail of the alteration of force–displacement-vectors in parous and nulliparous women. Arch Gynecol Obstet 285, 741–747 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-011-2024-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-011-2024-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation