Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Real-time elastography of patellar tendon in patients with auto-graft bone–tendon–bone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

  • Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Patellar tendon donor site has been previously evaluated in patients with auto-graft bone–tendon–bone (BTB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using either magnetic resonance imaging or B mode ultrasound. However, donor site patellar tendon strain ratio—reflecting structural features—has not been studied with US elastography. Here, we ascertain real-time elastography properties of patellar tendon donor site and clinical relevance of these properties in patients with auto-graft BTB ACL reconstruction in the postoperative period.

Methods

Patients who underwent ACL reconstruction using BTB autograft were evaluated. Demographic, operative and clinical data (severity of pain, Lysholm Knee score, sit to stand test, packages/year for smoking amount) were noted. Patellar tendons of the operated knees were evaluated by ultrasound (length and thickness) and sonoelastography (strain ratio). The healthy knees of the patients constituted the control group.

Results

Eighteen patients (17 M, 1 F; mean age 30.9 ± 7 years) were evaluated. Mean postoperative follow-up period was 22.1 ± 2.6 (range 18–26) months. Patellar tendons were shorter and thicker on the operated side when compared with the contralateral side (both p = 0.001). Patellar tendon strain ratios of the operated side were lower than the contralateral side (harder tendon on operated side). While there was no correlation between strain ratios and clinical variables (age, BMI, postoperative time, severity of pain, Lysholm score, all p values > 0.05), significant negative correlations were detected between strain ratios of proximal, middle and distal thirds of operated side and amount of smoking (p = 0.008, r = −0.607, p = 0.009, r = −0.598, p = 0.023, r = −0.533, respectively).

Conclusion

Patellar tendons on the operated sides seemed to thicken and shorten with decreased strain ratios at the donor side compared to the healthy side at an average of 2-year follow-up in patients with ACL reconstruction using BTB autograft, and amount of smoking had negative relationship with strain ratio of donor patellar tendon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brown J, Carson EW (1999) Revision anterior cruciate ligament surgery. Clin Sports Med 18(1):109–171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kannus P, Järvinen M (1987) Conservatively treated tears of the anterior cruciate ligament. Long-term results. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69(7):1007–1012

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cooper DE, Deng XH, Burstein AL, Warren RF (1993) The strength of the central third patellar tendon graft. A biomechanical study. Am J Sports Med 21(6):818–823

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kurosaka M, Yoshiya S, Andrish JT (1987) A biomechanical comparison of different surgical techniques of graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 15(3):225–229

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kartus J, Magnusson L, Stener S, Brandsson S, Eriksson BI, Karlsson J (1999) Complications following arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A 2–5-year follow-up of 604 patients with special emphasis on anterior knee pain. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 7(1):2–8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Salmon LJ, Russell VJ, Refshauge K et al (2006) Long-term outcome of endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon autograft: minimum 13-year review. Am J Sports Med 34(5):721–732

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bernicker JP, Haddad JL, Lintner DM, DiLiberti TC, Bocell JR (1998) Patellar tendon defect during the first year after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: appearance on serial magnetic resonance imaging. Arthroscopy 14(8):804–809

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kartus J, Movin T, Papadogiannakis N, Christensen LR, Lindahl S, Karlsson J (2000) A radiographic and histologic evaluation of the patellar tendon after harvesting its central third. Am J Sports Med 28(2):218–226

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pang BSF, Ying M (2006) Sonographic measurement of achilles tendons in asymptomatic subjects: variation with age, body height, and dominance of ankle. J Ultrasound Med 25(10):1291–1296

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Järvelä T, Paakkala T, Kannus P, Toivanen J, Järvinen M (2004) Ultrasonographic and power Doppler evaluation of the patellar tendon 10 years after harvesting its central third for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: comparison of patients without or with anterior knee pain. Am J Sports Med 32(1):39–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wiley JP, Bray RC, Wiseman DA, Elliott PD, Ladly KO, Vale LA (1997) Serial ultrasonographic imaging evaluation of the patellar tendon after harvesting its central one third for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Ultrasound Med 16(4):251–255

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Klauser AS, Faschingbauer R, Jaschke WR (2010) Is sonoelastography of value in assessing tendons? Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 14(3):323–333

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wu CH, Chang KV, Mio S, Chen WS, Wang TG (2011) Sonoelastography of the plantar fascia. Radiology 259(2):502–507

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. De Zordo T, Fink C, Feuchtner GM, Smekal V, Reindl M, Klauser AS (2009) Real-time sonoelastography findings in healthy achilles tendons. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193(2):134–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Schoderbek RJ, Treme GP, Miller MD (2007) Bone-patella tendon-bone autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Sports Med 26(4):525–547

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Witvrouw E, Lysens R, Bellemans J, Cambier D, Vanderstraeten G (2000) Intrinsic risk factors for the development of anterior knee pain in an athletic population. A two-year prospective study. Am J Sports Med 28(4):480–489

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tegner Y, Lysholm J (1985) Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res Sept 198:43–49

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tveter AT, Dagfinrud H, Moseng T, Holm I (2014) Health-related physical fitness measures: reference values and reference equations for use in clinical practice. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 95(7):1366–1373

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Svensson M, Kartus J, Ejerhed L, Lindahl S, Karlsson J (2004) Does the patellar tendon normalize after harvesting its central third?: A prospective long-term MRI study. Am J Sports Med 32(1):34–38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tohyama H, Yasuda K, Kitamura Y, Yamamoto E, Hayashi K (2003) The changes in mechanical properties of regenerated and residual tissues in the patellar tendon after removal of its central portion. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 18(18):765–772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sanchis-Alfonso V, Subías-López A, Monteagudo-Castro C, Roselló-Sastre E (1999) Healing of the patellar tendon donor defect created after central-third patellar tendon autograft harvest. A long-term histological evaluation in the lamb model. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 7(6):340–348

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Adriani E, Mariani PP, Maresca G, Santori N (1995) Healing of the patellar tendon after harvesting of its mid-third for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and evolution of the unclosed donor site defect. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 3(3):138–143

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Brandsson S, Faxén E, Eriksson BI et al (1998) Closing patellar tendon defects after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: absence of any benefit. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 6(2):82–87

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Järvelä T, Paakkala T, Kannus P, Järvinen M (2001) The incidence of patellofemoral osteoarthritis and associated findings 7 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft. Am J Sports Med 29(1):18–24

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nuray Akkaya.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Akkaya, S., Akkaya, N., Agladıoglu, K. et al. Real-time elastography of patellar tendon in patients with auto-graft bone–tendon–bone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136, 837–842 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-016-2459-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-016-2459-z

Keywords

Navigation