Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Percutaneous low-pressure bone stenting to control cement deposition in extensive lytic lesions

  • Interventional
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate low-pressure bone stenting combined with cementoplasty in extensive lytic lesions.

Methods

A single-centre study involving four consecutive patients (four women) with extensive lytic tumours was performed. The average age was 65 years. Surgical treatment was not indicated or not wished for by the patients. Institutional review board approval and informed consent were obtained. Percutaneous consolidation was performed by an interventional radiologist under fluoroscopy guidance. Follow-up was assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS).

Results

Under general (n = 2) or local (n = 2) anaesthesia, five 11-gauge bone biopsy needles were advanced in four lesions. Five auto-expandable uncovered stents (10-14 mm diameter and 40-60 mm long) were inserted. In all cases, bone cement was successfully placed into the tumours. The volume of cement that was injected through the cannulas into the stents was 5-10 mL. Using VAS, pain decreased from more than 9/10 preoperatively to less than 2/10 after the procedure for all patients (p < 0.05). No complications occurred during the follow-up (8-19 months).

Conclusion

This study suggests that cementoplasty combined with low-pressure bone stenting could allow effective bone stabilization resulting in pain relief.

Key Points

Low-pressure bone stenting is possible.

This technique improves cement injection control.

The procedure allows effective bone stabilization resulting in pain relief.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chiras J, Cormier E, Baragan H, Jean B, Rose M (2007) Interventional radiology in bone metastases. Bull Cancer 94(2):161–169

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gangi A, Buy X (2010) Percutaneous bone tumor management. Semin Interv Radiol 27(2):124–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Deschamps F, de Baere T (2012) Cementoplasty of bone metastases. Diagn Interv Imaging 93(9):685–689

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cazzato RL, Buy X, Eker O, Fabre T, Palussiere J (2014) Percutaneous long bone cementoplasty of the limbs: experience with fifty-one non-surgical patients. Eur Radiol 24(12):3059–3068

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu XW, Jin P, Liu K et al (2016) Comparison of percutaneous long bone cementoplasty with or without embedding a cement-filled catheter for painful long bone metastases with impending fracture. Eur Radiol

  6. Santiago FR, Del Mar Castellano Garcia M, Montes JL, Garcia MR, Fernandez JM (2009) Treatment of bone tumours by radiofrequency thermal ablation. Curr Rev Muscoskelet Med 2(1):43–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Deschamps F, Farouil G, de Baere T (2014) Percutaneous ablation of bone tumors. Diagn Interv Imaging 95(7-8):659–663

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Carrafiello G, Lagana D, Recaldini C et al (2007) Combined treatment of ablative therapy with percutaneous radiofrequency and cementoplasty of a symptomatic metastatic lesion of the acetabulum. Australas Radiol 51(Suppl):B344–348

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kastler B, Jacamon M, Aubry S et al (2007) Combined bipolar radiofrequency and cementoplasty of bone metastases. J Radiol 88(9 Pt 2):1242–1247

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cruz JP, Sahgal A, Whyne C, Fehlings MG, Smith R (2014) Tumor extravasation following a cement augmentation procedure for vertebral compression fracture in metastatic spinal disease. Journal of neurosurgery. Spine 21(3):372–377

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fourney DR, Schomer DF, Nader R et al (2003) Percutaneous vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty for painful vertebral body fractures in cancer patients. J Neurosurg 98(1 Suppl):21–30

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee MJ, Dumonski M, Cahill P, Stanley T, Park D, Singh K (2009) Percutaneous treatment of vertebral compression fractures: a meta-analysis of complications. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34(11):1228–1232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Deschamps F, Farouil G, Hakime A et al (2012) Cementoplasty of metastases of the proximal femur: is it a safe palliative option? J Vasc Interv Radiol 23(10):1311–1316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Berenson J, Pflugmacher R, Jarzem P et al (2011) Balloon kyphoplasty versus non-surgical fracture management for treatment of painful vertebral body compression fractures in patients with cancer: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 12(3):225–235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Deschamps F, Farouil G, Hakime A, Teriitehau C, Barah A, de Baere T (2012) Percutaneous stabilization of impending pathological fracture of the proximal femur. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 35(6):1428–1432

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Heini PF, Teuscher R (2012) Vertebral body stenting / stentoplasty. Swiss Med Wkly 142:w13658

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Martin-Lopez JE, Pavon-Gomez MJ, Romero-Tabares A, Molina-Lopez T (2015) Stentoplasty effectiveness and safety for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a systematic review. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 101(5):627–632

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kaczmarek K, Wiacek MP, Sulewski A, Kubaszewski L, Kaczmarczyk J, Nowakowski A (2014) Failure and success in the treatment of breast carcinoma in men: a case report. Pol Orthop Traumatol 79:1–4

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Capel C, Fichten A, Nicot B et al (2014) Should we fear cement leakage during kyphoplasty in percutaneous traumatic spine surgery? A single experience with 76 consecutive cases. Neurochirurgie 60(6):293–298

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lador R, Liberman S, Ben-Galim P, Dreiangel N, Reitman CA, Hipp JA (2013) A cadaver study to compare vertebral augmentation with a high-viscosity cement to augmentation with conventional lower-viscosity cement. J Spinal Disord Tech 26(2):68–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Georgy BA, Wong W (2007) Plasma-mediated radiofrequency ablation assisted percutaneous cement injection for treating advanced malignant vertebral compression fractures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 28(4):700–705

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pusceddu C, Sotgia B, Fele RM, Ballicu N, Melis L (2016) Combined Microwave Ablation and Cementoplasty in Patients with Painful Bone Metastases at High Risk of Fracture. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 39(1):74–80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Anselmetti GC, Manca A, Ortega C, Grignani G, Debernardi F, Regge D (2008) Treatment of extraspinal painful bone metastases with percutaneous cementoplasty: a prospective study of 50 patients. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 31(18704572):1165–1173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Dayer R, Peter R (2008) Percutaneous cementoplasty complicating the treatment of a pathologic subtrochanteric fracture: a case report. Injury 39(18539281):801–804

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Van der Linden YM, Dijkstra PD, Kroon HM et al (2004) Comparative analysis of risk factors for pathological fracture with femoral metastases. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 86(4):566–573

    Google Scholar 

  26. Dalbayrak S, Onen MR, Yilmaz M, Naderi S (2010) Clinical and radiographic results of balloon kyphoplasty for treatment of vertebral body metastases and multiple myelomas. J Clin Neurosci: Off J Neurosurg Soc Australas 17(2):219–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Dhir V, Artifon EL, Gupta K et al (2013) Multicenter study on endoscopic ultrasound-guided expandable biliary metal stent placement: choice of access route, direction of stent insertion, and drainage route. Dig Endosc: Off J Jpn Gastroenterol Endosc Soc

Download references

Acknowledgements

The scientific guarantor of this publication is Olivier Hauger.

The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.

The authors state that this work has not received any funding.

No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper.

Institutional review board approval was obtained.

Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects (patients) in this study.

Methodology:

• prospective

• observational

• performed at one institution

The authors thank Pippa McKelvie-Sebileau for medical editorial services.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francois H. Cornelis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cornelis, F.H., Petitpierre, F., Fabre, T. et al. Percutaneous low-pressure bone stenting to control cement deposition in extensive lytic lesions. Eur Radiol 27, 3942–3946 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4703-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4703-x

Keywords

Navigation