Skip to main content
Log in

Cost-effectiveness of trauma CT in the trauma room versus the radiology department: the REACT trial

  • Emergency Radiology
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To determine the cost-effectiveness of trauma room CT compared with CT performed at the radiology department.

Methods

In this randomised controlled trial, adult patients requiring evaluation in a level 1 trauma centre were included. In the intervention hospital the CT system was located within the trauma room and in the control hospital within the radiology department. Direct and indirect medical costs of the institutionalised stay and diagnostic and therapeutic procedures were calculated.

Results

A total of 1,124 patients were randomised with comparable demographic characteristics. Mean number of non-institutionalised days alive was 322.5 in the intervention group (95 % CI 314–331) and 320.7 in the control group (95 % CI 312.1–329.2). Mean costs of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures per hospital inpatient day were €554 for the intervention group and €468 for the control group. Total mean costs in the intervention group were €16,002 (95 % CI 13,075–18,929) and €16,635 (95 % CI 13,528–19,743) for the control group (P = 0.77).

Conclusion

The present study showed that in trauma patients the setting with a CT system located in the trauma room did not provide any advantages or disadvantages from a health economics perspective over a CT system located in the radiology department.

Key Points

Computed tomography has become increasingly important in patients who have suffered trauma.

Emergency departments either use embedded CT facilities or CT machines in the radiology department.

The cost-effectiveness of CT was not influenced by the location of CT.

The number of non-institutionalised days alive was not influenced by the location.

Further assessment of optimal location of CT units is required.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Waydhas C (1999) Intrahospital transport of critically ill patients. Crit Care 3:R83–R89

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fung Kon Jin PH, Goslings JC, Ponsen KJ, van KC, Hoogerwerf N, Luitse JS (2008) Assessment of a new trauma workflow concept implementing a sliding CT scanner in the trauma room: the effect on workup times. J Trauma 64:1320–1326

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Saltzherr TP, Bakker FC, Beenen LFM, Dijkgraaf MGW, Reitsma JB, Goslings JC (2012) Randomized clinical trial comparing the effect of computed tomography in the trauma room versus the radiology department on injury outcomes. Br J Surg 99(S1):105–113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Champion HR, Sacco WJ, Copes WS, Gann DS, Gennarelli TA, Flanagan ME (1989) A revision of the Trauma Score. J Trauma 29:623–629

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Oostenbrink JB, Koopmanschap MA, Rutten FF (2002) Standardisation of costs: the Dutch manual for costing in economic evaluations. Pharmacoeconomics 20:443–454

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Oostenbrink JB, Buijs-Van der Woude T, van Agthoven M, Koopmanschap MA, Rutten FF (2003) Unit costs of inpatient hospital days. Pharmacoeconomics 21:263–271

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek (CBS) (2009). www.cbs.nl. Accessed 23 Jan 2010

  8. Fung Kon Jin PH, Dijkgraaf MG, Alons CL, van Kuijk C, Beenen LF, Koole GM, Gosling JC (2011) Improving CT scan capabilities with a new trauma workflow concept: simulation of hospital logistics using different CT scanner scenarios. Eur J Radiol 80:504–509

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This trial was funded by an unrestricted grant from ZonMw, the Netherlands organization for health research and development (grant number 3920.0005). We would like to thank the REACT trial Advisory Committee for their input and efforts during the design, preparation and conduction of the trial. The authors kindly thank M.G.T. Beentjes, G.F. Giannakopoulos, J. Mouthaan, M. Scholing and K.J. Vos for their efforts and advice in relation to data collection. We thank all prehospital personnel and trauma care organizations for their cooperation and efforts in enabling the conduction of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. P. Saltzherr.

Additional information

Members of the REACT study group are P.M.M. Bossuyt, P.H.P. Fung Kon Jin, C.P. Henny, G. Koole, J.S.K. Luitse and K.J. Ponsen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Saltzherr, T.P., Goslings, J.C., Bakker, F.C. et al. Cost-effectiveness of trauma CT in the trauma room versus the radiology department: the REACT trial. Eur Radiol 23, 148–155 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2593-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2593-0

Keywords

Navigation