Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Age-related changes in cortical bone mass: data from a German female cohort

  • Musculoskeletal
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To describe data from digital radiogrammetry (DXR) in an unselected German female cohort over a wide age range. Using a retrospective study design we analyzed radiographs of the hand from 540 German women (aged 5–96 years) using an automated assessment of cortical thickness, metacarpal index (MCI), and estimated cortical bone mineral density (DXR-BMD) on digitized radiographs. Both hands were radiographed in 97 women. In this group DXR-BMD and cortical thickness were significantly higher in the right metacarpals while there was no significant difference in MCI. To study the association with age we differentiated young (<20 years), middle-aged (20–45 years), and an older patients (>45 years). In young women all parameters increased significantly with age in a linear fashion (r=0.8 for DXR-BMD, r=0.7 for MCI). In those aged 25–45 years DXR-BMD and MCI were highest (peak bone mass). In women aged 45 or older all parameters decreased with age in an almost linear fashion with an annual change ranging from 0.7% to 0.9%. Our results for an unselected German female cohort indicate that DXR is a reliable, widely available osteodensitometric technique based on the refinement of conventional radiogrammetry. These findings are comparable to those from other studies and represent a valid resource for clinical application and for comparisons with other ethnic groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Virtama P, Mähönen H (1960) Thickness of the cortical layer as an estimate of mineral content of human finger bones. Br J Radiol 33:60–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Barnett E, Nordin BEC (1960) The radiological diagnosis of osteoporosis: a new approach. Clin Radiol 11:166–174

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Jorgensen JT, Andersen PB, Rosholm A, Bjarnason NH (2000) Digital X-ray radiogrammetry: a new appendicular bone densitometric method with high precision. Clin Physiol 20:330–335

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kalla AA, Meyers OL, Parkyn ND, Kotze TJvW (1989) Osteoporosis screening-radiogrammetry revisited. Br J Rheumatol 28:511–517

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dequeker J (1982) Precision of the radiogrammetric evaluation of bone mass at the metacarpal bone. In: Dequeker J, Johnston CC (eds) Non-invasive bone measurements: methodological problems. Oxford, Washington, pp 27–32

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jergas M, San Valentin R, Black D, Nevitt M, Palermo L, Genant HK, Cummings SR (1995) Radiogrammetry of the metacarpals predicts future hip fractures. J Bone Miner Res 10 [Suppl 1]:S371

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ward KA, Cotton J, Adams JE (2003) A technical and clinical evaluation of digital X-ray radiogrammetry. Osteoporos Int 14:389–395

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hyldstrup L, Nielsen SP (2001) Metacarpal index by digital X-ray radiogrammetry: normative reference values and comparison with dual X-ray absorptiometry. J Clin Densitom 4:299–306

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Böttcher J, Pfeil A, Rosholm A, Malich A, Petrovitch A, Heinrich B, Lehmann G, Mentzel HJ, Hein G, Linss W, Kaiser WA (2005) Influence of image-capturing parameters on digital X-ray radiogrammetry. J Clin Densitom 8:87–94

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Meema HE, Meema S (1987) Postmenopausal osteoporosis: simple screening method for diagnosis before structural failure. Radiology 164:405–410

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Meema HE, Meema S (1981) Radiogrammetry. In: Cohn SH (ed) Non-invasive measurements of bone mass. CRC, Boca Raton, pp 5–50

    Google Scholar 

  12. Geusens P, Dequeker J, Verstraeten A, Nijs J, Van Holsbeeck M (1986) Bone mineral content, cortical thickness and fracture rate in osteoporotic women after withdrawal of treatment with nandrolone decanoate, 1-alpha hydroxyvitamin D3, or intermittent calcium infusions. Maturitas 8:281–289

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kalla AA, Kotze TJW, Meyers OL (1992) Metacarpal bone mass in systemic lupus erythematotus. Clin Rheumatol 11:475–482

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. van Rijn RR, Grootfaam DS, Lequin MH, Boot AM, van Beek RD, Hop WC, van Kuijk C (2004) Digital radiogrammetry of the hand in a pediatric and adolescent Dutch Caucasian population: normative data and measurements in children with inflammatory bowel disease and juvenile chronic arthritis. Calcif Tissue Int 74:342–350

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Haugeberg G, Lodder MC, Lems WF, Uhlig T, Orstavik RE, Dijkmans BA, Kvien TK, Woolf AD (2004) Hand cortical bone mass and its associations with radiographic joint damage and fractures in 50–70 year old female patients with rheumatoid arthritis: cross sectional Oslo-Truro-Amsterdam (OSTRA) collaborative study. Ann Rheum Dis 63:1331–1334

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Böttcher J, Malich A, Pfeil A, Petrovitch A, Lehmann G, Heyne JP, Hein G, Kaiser WA (2004) Potential clinical relevance of digital radiogrammetry for quantification of periarticular bone demineralization in patients suffering from rheumatoid arthritis depending on severity and compared with DXA. Eur Radiol 14:631–637

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jensen T, Klarlund M, Hansen M, Jensen KE, Podenphant J, Hansen TM, Skjodt H, Hyldstrup L (2004) Bone loss in unclassified polyarthritis and early rheumatoid arthritis is better detected by digital X ray radiogrammetry than dual x ray absorptiometry: relationship with disease activity and radiographic outcome. Ann Rheum Dis 63:15–22

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Jensen T, Klarlund M, Hansen M, Jensen KE, Skjodt H, Hyldstrup L (2004) Connective tissue metabolism in patients with unclassified polyarthritis and early rheumatoid arthritis. Relationship to disease activity, bone mineral density, and radiographic outcome. J Rheumatol 31:1698–1708

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Stewart A, Mackenzie LM, Black AJ, Reid DM (2004) Predicting erosive disease in rheumatoid arthritis. A longitudinal study of changes in bone density using digital X-ray radiogrammetry: a pilot study. Rheumatology (Oxf) 43:1561–1564

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Böttcher J, Pfeil A, Teufl F, Petrovitch A, Lehmann G, Kramer A, Mentzel HJ, Hansch A, Malich A, Hein G, Kaiser WA (2005) Einfluss der Körperkonstitution auf die mittels digitaler Radiogrammetrie evaluierte Knochenmineraldichte. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 177:197–203

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Helela T, Virtama P (1970) Cortical thickness of long bones in different age groups. Symposium ossium. Livingstone, London, pp 238–240

    Google Scholar 

  22. Horsman A, Simpson M (1975) The measurement of sequential changes in cortical bone geometry. Br J Radiol 48:471–476

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Maggio D, Pacifici R, Cherubini A, Simonelli G, Luchetti M, Aisa MC, Cucinotta D, Adami S, Senin U (1997) Age-related cortical bone loss at the metacarpal. Calcif Tissue Int 60:94–97

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Maggio D, Pacifici R, Cherubini A, Aisa MC, Santucci C, Cucinotta D, Senin U (1995) Appendicular cortical bone loss after age 65: sex-dependent event? Calcif Tissue Int 56:410–414

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Crespo R, Revilla M, Usabiago J, Crespo E, Garcia-Arino J, Villa LF, Rico H (1998) Metacarpal radiogrammetry by computed radiography in postmenopausal women with Colles' fracture and vertebral crush fracture syndrome. Calcif Tissue Int 62:470–473

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bouxsein ML, Palermo L, Yeung C, Black DM (2002) Digital X-ray radiogrammetry predicts hip, wrist and vertebral fracture risk in elderly women: a prospective analysis from the study of osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 13:358–365

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Reed MR, Murray JR, Abdy SE, Francis RM, McCaskie AW (2004) The use of digital X-ray radiogrammetry and peripheral dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in patients attending fracture clinic after distal forearm fracture. Bone 34:716–719

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Rosholm A, Hyldstrup L, Backsgaard L, Grunkin M, Thodberg HH (2001) Estimation of bone mineral density by digital X-ray radiogrammetry: theoretical background and clinical testing. Osteoporos Int 12:961–969

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Malich A, Freesmeyer MG, Mentzel HJ, Sauner D, Boettcher J, Petrovitch A, Behrendt W, Kaiser WA (2003) Normative values of bone parameters of children and adolescents using digital computer-assisted radiogrammetry (DXR). J Clin Densitom 6:103–111

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Black DM, Palermo L, Sorensen T, Jorgensen JT, Lewis C, Tylavsky F, Wallace R, Harris E, Cummings SR (2001) A normative reference database study for Pronosco X-posure System. J Clin Densitom 4:5–12

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Wüster C, Wenzler M, Kappes J, Rehm C, Gühring T, Ambjerg D (2000) Radiogrammetry as a clinical method for estimating bone mineral density-A German reference database. J Bone Miner Res 15:S298

    Google Scholar 

  32. Coren S, Porac C (1977) Fifty centuries of right-handedness: the historical record. Science 198 631–632

    PubMed  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Adami S, Zamberlan N, Gatti D, Zanfisi C, Braga V, Broggini M, Rossini M (1996) Computed radiographic absorptiometry and morphometry in the assessment of postmenopausal bone loss. Osteoporos Int 6:8–13

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Derisquebourg T, Dubois P, Devogelaer JP, Meys E, Duquesnoy B, Nagant de Deuxchaisnes C, Delcambre B, Marchandise X (1994) Automated computerized radiogrammetry of the second metacarpal and its correlation with absorptiometry of the forearm and spine. Calcif Tissue Int 54:461–465

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Glüer CC, Jergas M, Grampp S, Engelke K et al (1997) Peripheral measurement techniques for the assessment of osteoporosis. Semin Nucl Med 27:229–247

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, St. Elisabeth-Krankenhaus, Werthmannstrasse 1, 50935, Cologne, Germany

    V. A. Molina Toledo & M. Jergas

Authors
  1. V. A. Molina Toledo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Jergas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Jergas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Toledo, V.A.M., Jergas, M. Age-related changes in cortical bone mass: data from a German female cohort. Eur Radiol 16, 811–817 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-005-0013-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-005-0013-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation