Skip to main content
Log in

A prevalence study of the atlantomastoid muscle

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To contribute to the documentation and consideration of the prevalence of the atlantomastoid muscle in humans.

Methods

Sixty formalin-fixed cadaveric sides were dissected for the presence of the atlantomastoid muscle (2 sides per donor). Laterality, origin, insertion, and other observable characteristics of the variant were recorded along with donor sex for comparative analyses.

Results

The atlantomastoid muscle was observed in nine sides (15%): two left side only, three right side only, and 2 bilaterally. The origin of the muscle was consistent from the transverse process of the atlas, lateral to both the insertion of obliquus capitis inferior and the origin of obliquus capitis superior. In one instance, the origin of atlantomastoid was continuous with the most superior tendinous slip of levator scapulae. The insertion of each atlantomastoid variant was the mastoid process, however, the precise location was variable.

Conclusion

The atlantomastoid muscle is a common accessory muscle of the suboccipital region; the muscle was present in 15% of the cadaveric sides dissected in this study. Despite the notable prevalence of atlantomastoid muscles, there is little current literature dedicated to its study. Here, we document the first new information related to the prevalence of atlantomastoid since 1964 and discuss the development and potential clinical significance of the muscle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

References

  1. Blackwood NO, Georgiev GP, Wysiadecki G, Aysenne A, Iwanaga J, Tubbs RS (2021) An unusual variant of the atlantomastoid muscle. Folia Morphol. https://doi.org/10.5603/FM.a2021.0126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Burke AC, Nowicki JL (2003) A new view of patterning domains in the vertebrate mesoderm. Dev Cell 4:159–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00033-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fernández-de-Las-Peñas C, Ge HY, Alonso-Blanco C, González-Iglesias J, Arendt-Nielsen L (2010) Referred pain areas of active myofascial trigger points in head, neck, and shoulder muscles, in chronic tension type headache. J Bodyw Mov Ther 14:391–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2009.06.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gruber W (1876) Über den musculus atlantico-mastoideus. In Reichert CB, Du Bois-Reymond E, Archiv für Anatomie, Physiologie und Wissenschaftliche Medicin. Veit and Co., Leipzig.

  5. Le Double AF (1897) Traite des variations du systeme musculaire de l’homme et de leur signification au point de vue de l’anthropologie zoologique. Schleicher Frères, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lewis W (1920) The cartilaginous skull of a human embryo twenty-one millimeters in length. Contri Carnegie Ins 9:301–324

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mekonen HK, Hikspoors JP, Mommen G, Eleonore KÖhler S, Lamers WH (2016) Development of the epaxial muscles in the human embryo. Clin Anat 29:1031–1045. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.22775

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mori M (1964) Statistics on the musculature of the Japanese. Okajimas Folia Anat Jpn 40:195–300

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Som PM, Laitman JT (2017) Embryology, variations, and innervations of the human neck muscles. Neurographics 7:215–242. https://doi.org/10.3174/ng.3170206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Testut L (1884) Les anomalies musculaires chez l’homme expliquées par l’anatomie comparée: Leur importance en anthropologie. G Masson, Paris

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors sincerely thank those who donated their bodies to science so that anatomical research could be performed. Results from such research can potentially increase humankind’s overall knowledge that can then improve patient care. Therefore, these donors and their families deserve our highest gratitude.

Funding

Funding for this study was provided by Queen’s University and University of Western States.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

RA Lee—Project development, data collection, data analysis, manuscript writing. SC Pang—Project development, manuscript editing. WH Borman—Project development, data collection, manuscript editing. SO Herrin—Project development, data collection, manuscript editing. LSW Bale—Project development, data collection, manuscript writing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Logan S. W. Bale.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors have no competing interests to declare.

Ethical approval

This research was part of a study approved by the Health Sciences and Affiliated Teaching Hospitals Research Ethics Board at Queen’s University, and it was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board at University of Western States. The research was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, R., Pang, S.C., Borman, W.H. et al. A prevalence study of the atlantomastoid muscle. Surg Radiol Anat 44, 1349–1353 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-022-03022-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-022-03022-6

Keywords

Navigation