References
Colohan SM, Massenburg BB, Gougoutas AJ (2020) Breast reduction: surgical techniques with an emphasis on evidence-based practice and outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 146(3):339e-e350
Kerrigan CL, Collins ED, Kim HM et al (2002) Reduction mammaplasty: defining medical necessity. Medical Decision Making: An Int J Soc Med Decision Making 22(3):208–217
Agbenorku P, Agamah G, Agbenorku M, Obeng M (2012) Reduction mammaplasty in a developing country: a guideline for plastic surgeons for patient selection. Aesthetic Plast Surg 36(1):91–96
Nguyen JT, Wheatley MJ, Schnur PL, Nguyen TA, Winn SR (2008) Reduction mammaplasty: a review of managed care medical policy coverage criteria. Plast Reconstr Surg 121(4):1092–1100
Schnur PL (1999) Reduction mammaplasty-the schnur sliding scale revisited. Ann Plast Surg 42(1):107–108
Ikander P, Drejoe JB, Lumholt P et al (2014) Measurement of breast volume is a useful supplement to select candidates for surgical breast reduction. Dan Med J 61(1):A4760
Dancey A, Khan M, Dawson J, Peart F (2008) Gigantomastia–a classification and review of the literature. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surgery: JPRAS 61(5):493–502
Dafydd H, Roehl KR, Phillips LG, Dancey A, Peart F, Shokrollahi K (2011) Redefining gigantomastia. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surgery: JPRAS 64(2):160–163
Collins DE, Kerrigan CL, Kim M et al (2002) The effectiveness of surgical and nonsurgical interventions in relieving the symptoms of macromastia. Plast Reconstr Surg 109(5):1556–1566
Waltho D, Hatchell A, Thoma A (2017) Gynecomastia classification for surgical management: a systematic review and novel classification system. Plast Reconstr Surg 139(3):638e-e648
Choppin SB, Wheat JS, Gee M, Goyal A (2016) The accuracy of breast volume measurement methods: a systematic review. Breast 28:121–129
Coltman CE, McGhee DE, Steele JR (2017) Three-dimensional scanning in women with large, ptotic breasts: implications for bra cup sizing and design. Ergonomics 60(3):439–445
Yang J, Zhang R, Shen J, Hu Y, Lv Q (2015) The three-dimensional techniques in the objective measurement of breast aesthetics. Aesthetic Plast Surg 39(6):910–915
Swanson E (2012) A measurement system for evaluation of shape changes and proportions after cosmetic breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 129(4):982–992
Funding
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human and animal rights
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent
For this type of study, informed consent is not required.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sisti, A., Sadeghi, P. Breast Hypertrophy: Call for a Common Universal Classification System and Terminology. Aesth Plast Surg 46, 535–536 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02490-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02490-2